jwst-gc pipeline monitor

w51 · 2026-09-19 14:56 EDT
1 runs 1 failing 0 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

w51 6151/o001 8d ago
13 fail14 warn
F140MF162MF182MF187NF210MF335MF360MF405NF410MF480M

Cutout runs

Every cutout run on disk: the shared monitor5as probes plus the hand-made experiment cutouts. A cutout run stops after m6 — m7 and m8 need more than one filter — so "catalogs" here counts per-filter products only. These rows also flag zero-byte products and orphan tmp* files: a write that died mid-flight leaves both, and a count-based ladder reads them as finished work.

fieldlabelframescatalogs filterstouchedflags
w51compid_test 821 F480M:8 77d ago
w51concgate_test 821 F480M:8 77d ago
w51darkfil_A 821 F480M:8 78d ago
w51darkfil_B 821 F480M:8 78d ago
w51darkfil_F335M_curmain 821 F335M:8 80d ago
w51darkfil_F480M_curmain 821 F480M:8 80d ago
w51darkfil_F480M_dd05nf 821 F480M:8 78d ago
w51darkfil_F480M_dedup05 821 F480M:8 78d ago
w51darkfil_F480M_dedup07 821 F480M:8 78d ago
w51decouple_test 821 F480M:8 77d ago
w51fpdedup_test 821 F480M:8 77d ago
w51irs2_dbg_fixA 1221 F480M:12 83d ago
w51monitor5as 820 F182M:8 48d ago
w51nfloor61 1621 F480M:16 80d ago
w51nfloor61_pfonly 1621 F480M:16 80d ago
w51prom_aggr 1621 F480M:16 81d ago
w51prom_base 1621 F480M:16 80d ago
w51prom_cons 1621 F480M:16 81d ago
w51prom_iter 1621 F480M:16 80d ago
w51satfloor_test 821 F480M:8 77d ago
w51trulysat_test 821 F480M:8 77d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F187N_base 1821 F187N:18 81d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F187N_nm 1821 F187N:18 78d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F187N_rec 1821 F187N:18 81d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F187N_recf 1821 F187N:18 71d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_base 821 F480M:8 81d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_cap 821 F480M:8 71d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_crater 821 F480M:8 74d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_crater2 821 F480M:8 74d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_lock 821 F480M:8 73d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_lock2 821 F480M:8 73d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_nm 821 F480M:8 78d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_promfix 821 F480M:8 74d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_rec 821 F480M:8 81d ago
w51w51_darkfil_F480M_recf 821 F480M:8 71d ago
w51w51df187_base 1421 F187N:14 74d ago
w51w51df187_loose 1421 F187N:14 74d ago
w51w51df187_noshape 1421 F187N:14 72d ago
w51w51df187_pf 1421 F187N:14 74d ago
w51w51df480_base 821 F480M:8 74d ago
w51w51df480_loose 821 F480M:8 74d ago
w51w51df480_pf 821 F480M:8 74d ago
w51w51main_base 1020 F405N:10 89d ago
w51w51main_struct03 1020 F405N:10 89d ago
w51w51main_struct12 1020 F405N:10 89d ago
w51w51main_struct23 1020 F405N:10 89d ago
w51w51main_struct23bg 1020 F405N:10 89d ago

Detail

w51 · 6151/o001

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/w51 back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F140M6464·6457133333destreak
F162M6464·6457133333destreak
F182M6464·6457133333destreak
F187N6464·6457133333destreak
F210M6464·6457133333destreak
F335M1616·1657133333destreak
F360M1616·1657133333destreak
F405N1616·1657133333destreak
F410M1616·1657133333destreak
F480M1616·1657133333destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 6151/o001.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F140M 1 64 0 0 190 7827.08 histogram 22/27 59402.8 (2,1) 2026-08-02T07:13:37Z
F140M_o001 1 64 5 0 190 — —/— — 2026-08-24T14:43:03Z
F162M 1 64 0 0 232 7828.78 histogram 23/28 59342.6 (3,4) 2026-08-02T02:22:22Z
F162M_o001 1 64 11 0 232 — —/— — 2026-08-24T15:28:11Z
F182M 1 64 0 0 268 7826.91 histogram 24/28 59776.2 (4,4) 2026-08-02T02:18:49Z
F182M_o001 1 64 0 0 268 — —/— — 2026-08-24T15:51:19Z
F187N 1 64 0 0 123 0.13 same-star 23/26 56416.2 (1,2) 2026-08-01T21:38:39Z
F187N_o001 1 64 0 0 123 — —/— — 2026-08-24T16:11:53Z
F210M 1 64 0 0 295 2.32 same-star 23/28 59776.2 (4,4) 2026-08-01T21:22:34Z
F210M_o001 1 64 0 0 290 — —/— — 2026-08-24T16:35:00Z
F335M 1 16 0 0 247 0.09 same-star 9/24 59669.1 (1,3) 2026-08-01T21:29:24Z
F335M_o001 1 16 0 0 247 — —/— — 2026-08-24T16:53:53Z
F360M 1 16 0 0 413 0.11 same-star 19/26 59506.7 (2,1) 2026-08-01T21:28:59Z
F360M_o001 1 16 0 0 413 — —/— — 2026-08-24T16:59:59Z
F405N 1 16 0 0 289 0.60 same-star 23/25 34535.8 (0,3) 2026-08-01T22:44:39Z
F405N_o001 1 16 0 0 289 — —/— — 2026-08-24T17:04:35Z
F410M 1 16 0 0 400 0.06 same-star 18/26 59333.0 (0,3) 2026-08-01T22:49:26Z
F410M_o001 1 16 0 0 400 — —/— — 2026-08-24T17:10:38Z
F480M 1 16 0 0 463 0.09 same-star 20/26 59333.0 (0,3) 2026-08-01T23:50:46Z
F480M_o001 1 16 0 0 463 — —/— — 2026-08-24T17:16:34Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

phaseproductspipeline tag(s)
m7332026-09-09_PR829_1d68c84 (33)
m8152026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty (11), 2026-09-09_PR829_1d68c84 (3), 2026-09-10_PR834_cd42209-dirty (1)

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • fail
    m8: products come from 3 different pipeline tags
    2026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty (11), 2026-09-09_PR829_1d68c84 (3), 2026-09-10_PR834_cd42209-dirty (1). Image and catalog must be deployed from the SAME pipeline run; a mixed-tag set is not releasable as one product.
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
    what is affected, and why
    This happens when filters are re-run at different times and only some are regenerated — a partial rerun, or a merge that picked up an older per-filter product. The fix is to re-run the lagging filters at the current tag, not to re-stamp: the tag records which code wrote the numbers.
    Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    pipeline tagproducts
    2026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty11
    2026-09-09_PR829_1d68c843
    2026-09-10_PR834_cd42209-dirty1
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F140M_o001: 5/64 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_o001_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 2/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrca2 visit 1: dRA -2.4, dDec 0.6 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 0.9, dDec 2.7 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 0.9, dDec 2.7 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 0.4, dDec 3.5 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 0.5, dDec 3.6 masnrca1 nrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±4 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrcb24/8
    nrca21/8
    nrca10/8
    nrca30/8
    nrca40/8
    nrcb10/8
    nrcb30/8
    nrcb40/8
    Diagnostic writeupD2 — internal astrometric repeatability · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrca2-2.40.62.5383.03387610.0
    1nrcb20.92.72.9394.03781610.0
    1nrcb20.92.72.8402.03835610.0
    1nrcb20.43.53.6409.03692410.0
    1nrcb20.53.63.6414.03685510.0
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F162M_o001: 11/64 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_o001_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 4/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrca1 visit 1: dRA 0.2, dDec 2.2 masnrca1 visit 1: dRA 0.1, dDec 2.3 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA 3.5, dDec -0.5 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA 3.6, dDec -0.5 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA 4.0, dDec 1.7 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA 3.9, dDec 1.1 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -0.3, dDec -4.2 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -0.9, dDec -3.3 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 3.0, dDec -4.5 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 3.0, dDec -4.5 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 0.3, dDec 2.0 masnrca1 nrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±4 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrca24/8
    nrcb14/8
    nrca12/8
    nrcb41/8
    nrca30/8
    nrca40/8
    nrcb20/8
    nrcb30/8
    Diagnostic writeupD2 — internal astrometric repeatability · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrca10.22.22.2375.06064510.0
    1nrca10.12.32.3375.05929410.0
    1nrca23.5-0.53.5542.05905110.0
    1nrca23.6-0.53.6543.05909510.0
    1nrca24.01.74.3485.05923110.0
    1nrca23.91.14.1487.06081510.0
    1nrcb1-0.3-4.24.2551.05574310.0
    1nrcb1-0.9-3.33.4432.05494610.0
    1nrcb13.0-4.55.4684.05370810.0
    1nrcb13.0-4.55.4680.05451210.0
    1nrcb40.32.02.0688.0100003.0
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F140M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F162M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F182M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F187N visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F187N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F210M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F335M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F360M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F405N visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F410M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F410M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • fail
    F480M visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 3.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    m8: 12 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F140M visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F162M visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F182M visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F140M visit 1: worst tile 59402.8 mas at cell (2,1) (> 15 mas)
    22/27 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    27/27 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 7827.08 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 23586.9 mas, contrast 3cell (0,4): 41676.4 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 44542.1 mas, contrast 4cell (1,2): 56466.7 mas, contrast 5cell (1,3): 44505.9 mas, contrast 7cell (1,4): 47701.5 mas, contrast 7cell (1,5): 44938.5 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 34731.9 mas, contrast 5cell (2,1): 59402.8 mas, contrast 7cell (2,2): 50392.6 mas, contrast 7cell (2,3): 48605.2 mas, contrast 8cell (2,4): 4794.8 mas, contrast 7cell (2,5): 50340.6 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 54337.3 mas, contrast 6cell (3,1): 59384.3 mas, contrast 7cell (3,2): 38636.6 mas, contrast 9cell (3,3): 55853.4 mas, contrast 7cell (3,4): 22838.0 mas, contrast 7cell (3,5): 49756.0 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 54685.2 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 49283.3 mas, contrast 7cell (4,2): 18919.5 mas, contrast 8cell (4,3): 59046.8 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 59368.0 mas, contrast 3cell (5,0): 45871.8 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 42772.8 mas, contrast 7cell (5,2): 7032.8 mas, contrast 3
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (2,1)59,402.8-38,690.645,074.77.053455
    (3,1)59,384.311,449.3-58,270.17.058674
    (4,4)59,368.0-59,000.06,600.03.04195
    (4,3)59,046.8-25,010.3-53,488.45.025309
    (1,2)56,466.7-55,392.5-10,961.85.030154
    (3,3)55,853.4-55,848.4-743.57.060814
    (4,0)54,685.2-558.0-54,682.46.032428
    (3,0)54,337.3-11,902.753,017.66.049565
    (2,2)50,392.644,167.7-24,261.77.056080
    (2,5)50,340.6-50,336.3656.86.036554
    (3,5)49,756.0-1,839.9-49,722.06.018787
    (4,1)49,283.3-36,258.233,379.47.058501
    (2,3)48,605.239,014.228,988.98.084882
    (1,4)47,701.5-41,335.0-23,808.57.060015
    (5,0)45,871.8-45,856.81,173.64.015087
    (1,5)44,938.5-41,739.616,651.66.027283
    (0,5)44,542.1-27,055.535,383.74.013703
    (1,3)44,505.9-38,112.022,983.77.063945
    (5,1)42,772.8-40,517.213,706.47.034165
    (0,4)41,676.4-27,470.431,341.66.038932
    (3,2)38,636.622,536.931,382.79.069991
    (2,0)34,731.9-7,825.3-33,838.85.018891
    (0,3)23,586.9-21,500.0-9,700.03.02290
    (3,4)22,838.0-20,189.310,675.57.045751
    (4,2)18,919.5-18,607.9-3,419.48.060273
    (5,2)7,032.8-3,500.06,100.03.01849
    (2,4)4,794.82,624.4-4,012.97.061924
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F162M visit 1: worst tile 59342.6 mas at cell (3,4) (> 15 mas)
    23/28 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    28/28 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 7828.78 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 45425.1 mas, contrast 4cell (0,4): 21674.3 mas, contrast 7cell (0,5): 43897.4 mas, contrast 5cell (1,1): 38910.2 mas, contrast 3cell (1,2): 57887.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 30943.4 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 51605.3 mas, contrast 7cell (1,5): 44904.6 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 32260.2 mas, contrast 5cell (2,1): 54822.6 mas, contrast 7cell (2,2): 36183.4 mas, contrast 7cell (2,3): 29193.5 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 55949.9 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 57977.2 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 13234.8 mas, contrast 8cell (3,1): 47921.9 mas, contrast 8cell (3,2): 28720.4 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 49374.5 mas, contrast 8cell (3,4): 59342.6 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 28069.6 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 58511.6 mas, contrast 5cell (4,1): 42655.6 mas, contrast 8cell (4,2): 13521.7 mas, contrast 7cell (4,3): 48741.3 mas, contrast 6cell (4,4): 46840.2 mas, contrast 3cell (5,0): 45917.2 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 29023.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 55989.3 mas, contrast 4
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (3,4)59,342.6-39,279.444,482.36.055530
    (4,0)58,511.6-53,802.422,998.05.039027
    (2,5)57,977.2-55,564.116,552.76.046217
    (1,2)57,887.4-53,782.0-21,411.46.034804
    (5,2)55,989.3-27,800.0-48,600.04.08631
    (2,4)55,949.933,736.0-44,634.88.073103
    (2,1)54,822.6-39,367.4-38,153.97.061704
    (1,4)51,605.3-22,205.2-46,583.67.069867
    (3,3)49,374.5-47,055.114,955.28.076451
    (4,3)48,741.34,184.9-48,561.36.036016
    (3,1)47,921.9-11,354.346,557.48.068344
    (4,4)46,840.2-43,800.0-16,600.03.04654
    (5,0)45,917.2-45,902.11,178.84.018095
    (0,3)45,425.1-45,000.0-6,200.04.09857
    (1,5)44,904.6-41,694.316,673.56.039760
    (0,5)43,897.4-17,390.140,305.95.018562
    (4,1)42,655.62,262.4-42,595.58.065483
    (1,1)38,910.2-34,600.017,800.03.04379
    (2,2)36,183.4-35,833.15,023.27.068360
    (2,0)32,260.2-19,054.0-26,032.05.025237
    (1,3)30,943.4-1,760.930,893.38.072966
    (2,3)29,193.528,039.0-8,128.55.029380
    (5,1)29,023.3-12,564.826,162.66.040380
    (3,2)28,720.418,112.822,288.85.025256
    (3,5)28,069.6-19,904.219,792.05.026764
    (0,4)21,674.3-19,389.9-9,685.47.051586
    (4,2)13,521.7-7,010.911,562.27.072043
    (3,0)13,234.83,872.5-12,655.68.062808
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F182M visit 1: worst tile 59776.2 mas at cell (4,4) (> 15 mas)
    24/28 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    28/28 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 7826.91 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 30652.2 mas, contrast 4cell (0,4): 21762.2 mas, contrast 8cell (0,5): 44546.5 mas, contrast 5cell (1,1): 37220.4 mas, contrast 3cell (1,2): 49658.9 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 45007.9 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 40536.8 mas, contrast 8cell (1,5): 31273.1 mas, contrast 7cell (2,0): 31814.5 mas, contrast 5cell (2,1): 54806.9 mas, contrast 7cell (2,2): 54888.3 mas, contrast 8cell (2,3): 29192.9 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 15770.2 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 55870.9 mas, contrast 7cell (3,0): 50542.3 mas, contrast 7cell (3,1): 40456.2 mas, contrast 7cell (3,2): 23565.9 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 55862.2 mas, contrast 7cell (3,4): 13178.9 mas, contrast 7cell (3,5): 43834.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 59166.2 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 42656.8 mas, contrast 8cell (4,2): 57329.1 mas, contrast 7cell (4,3): 24042.8 mas, contrast 6cell (4,4): 59776.2 mas, contrast 3cell (5,0): 57171.2 mas, contrast 5cell (5,1): 42390.2 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 8792.0 mas, contrast 3
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (4,4)59,776.2-58,600.011,800.03.06022
    (4,0)59,166.257,806.312,612.36.041083
    (4,2)57,329.1-56,901.5-6,988.57.071584
    (5,0)57,171.2-35,728.5-44,632.15.020272
    (2,5)55,870.9-51,752.7-21,052.57.054210
    (3,3)55,862.2-55,858.3-661.07.076822
    (2,2)54,888.346,629.228,956.08.069601
    (2,1)54,806.9-39,341.5-38,158.17.060945
    (3,0)50,542.3-36,067.5-35,407.07.072385
    (1,2)49,658.920,936.0-45,029.96.035958
    (1,3)45,007.937,423.7-25,003.58.077600
    (0,5)44,546.5-27,004.235,428.35.022110
    (3,5)43,834.5-1,744.8-43,799.76.036593
    (4,1)42,656.82,259.7-42,596.98.064597
    (5,1)42,390.2-25,546.8-33,827.36.039929
    (1,4)40,536.8-27,452.7-29,825.88.081942
    (3,1)40,456.2-27,357.3-29,804.07.068183
    (1,1)37,220.4-31,000.020,600.03.04288
    (2,0)31,814.5-20,916.3-23,972.35.029689
    (1,5)31,273.1-27,455.1-14,974.27.054806
    (0,3)30,652.2-17,039.3-25,479.74.011199
    (2,3)29,192.928,038.8-8,127.35.026331
    (4,3)24,042.8-21,379.010,999.66.037606
    (3,2)23,565.9-23,041.24,945.35.025055
    (0,4)21,762.2-19,484.6-9,692.58.069632
    (2,4)15,770.2-15,497.2-2,921.68.083785
    (3,4)13,178.9-12,210.84,957.67.062582
    (5,2)8,792.07,300.04,900.03.02060
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F187N visit 1: worst tile 56416.2 mas at cell (1,2) (> 15 mas)
    23/26 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F187N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    7/26 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.13 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 25276.5 mas, contrast 3cell (0,4): 5.6 mas, contrast 10cell (0,5): 10.8 mas, contrast 8cell (1,2): 56416.2 mas, contrast 5cell (1,3): 3.9 mas, contrast 13cell (1,4): 11.8 mas, contrast 14cell (1,5): 6.8 mas, contrast 7cell (2,0): 5.8 mas, contrast 5cell (2,1): 6.5 mas, contrast 9cell (2,2): 7.4 mas, contrast 9cell (2,3): 1.6 mas, contrast 10cell (2,4): 3.9 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 4.8 mas, contrast 8cell (3,0): 8.0 mas, contrast 13cell (3,1): 7.0 mas, contrast 10cell (3,2): 42973.1 mas, contrast 7cell (3,3): 2.6 mas, contrast 9cell (3,4): 3.2 mas, contrast 11cell (3,5): 47214.4 mas, contrast 4cell (4,0): 14.9 mas, contrast 10cell (4,1): 10.6 mas, contrast 21cell (4,2): 8.7 mas, contrast 15cell (4,3): 29955.6 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 15.5 mas, contrast 5cell (5,1): 42759.8 mas, contrast 5cell (5,2): 5.2 mas, contrast 3
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,2)56,416.2-55,349.2-10,920.45.022419
    (3,5)47,214.416,600.0-44,200.04.011499
    (3,2)42,973.132,073.228,600.77.039147
    (5,1)42,759.8-40,510.513,685.75.019800
    (4,3)29,955.6-17,235.124,500.86.018211
    (0,3)25,276.5-10,700.022,900.03.01802
    (5,0)15.5-6.5-14.05.050
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F210M visit 1: worst tile 59776.2 mas at cell (4,4) (> 15 mas)
    23/28 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    28/28 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 2.32 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 27115.8 mas, contrast 4cell (0,4): 58155.9 mas, contrast 8cell (0,5): 44620.5 mas, contrast 6cell (1,1): 37186.0 mas, contrast 3cell (1,2): 49658.5 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 45002.5 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 25776.0 mas, contrast 5cell (1,5): 49201.3 mas, contrast 7cell (2,0): 52492.5 mas, contrast 7cell (2,1): 35474.2 mas, contrast 8cell (2,2): 49667.6 mas, contrast 8cell (2,3): 26683.3 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 25025.5 mas, contrast 5cell (2,5): 14255.7 mas, contrast 8cell (3,0): 47224.4 mas, contrast 9cell (3,1): 52758.9 mas, contrast 8cell (3,2): 22305.3 mas, contrast 7cell (3,3): 41665.4 mas, contrast 4cell (3,4): 55444.8 mas, contrast 9cell (3,5): 43836.1 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 25413.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 42658.3 mas, contrast 8cell (4,2): 38339.4 mas, contrast 8cell (4,3): 52038.9 mas, contrast 7cell (4,4): 59776.2 mas, contrast 3cell (5,0): 57156.4 mas, contrast 5cell (5,1): 22413.6 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 58471.9 mas, contrast 4
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (4,4)59,776.2-58,600.011,800.03.06290
    (5,2)58,471.9-28,600.051,000.04.010616
    (0,4)58,155.9-23,839.753,045.08.085690
    (5,0)57,156.4-35,705.3-44,631.75.022688
    (3,4)55,444.854,644.69,385.69.073937
    (3,1)52,758.932,254.6-41,751.08.072983
    (2,0)52,492.5-52,137.4-6,096.17.034610
    (4,3)52,038.942,628.5-29,847.27.044183
    (2,2)49,667.6-30,184.639,443.18.079862
    (1,2)49,658.520,935.6-45,029.76.039172
    (1,5)49,201.3-48,694.07,047.37.065609
    (3,0)47,224.4-34,216.3-32,548.39.086937
    (1,3)45,002.537,417.6-25,002.88.086196
    (0,5)44,620.5-27,061.835,477.56.025879
    (3,5)43,836.1-1,744.1-43,801.46.043734
    (4,1)42,658.32,329.0-42,594.78.074614
    (3,3)41,665.4-23,799.734,199.14.595955
    (4,2)38,339.4-26,537.927,670.38.083304
    (1,1)37,186.0-32,200.018,600.03.04992
    (2,1)35,474.2-2,295.8-35,399.88.066176
    (0,3)27,115.8-24,974.7-10,560.84.012402
    (2,3)26,683.3-25,305.0-8,465.15.033052
    (1,4)25,776.0-23,259.511,108.45.023068
    (4,0)25,413.5-1,693.8-25,357.06.044894
    (2,4)25,025.516,137.8-19,127.15.023005
    (5,1)22,413.6-5,556.221,714.06.044195
    (3,2)22,305.3863.522,288.57.033338
    (2,5)14,255.714,195.1-1,313.58.064807
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F335M visit 1: worst tile 59669.1 mas at cell (1,3) (> 15 mas)
    9/24 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    22/24 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.09 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,4): 4.6 mas, contrast 5cell (0,5): 43804.1 mas, contrast 4cell (1,2): 52859.8 mas, contrast 4cell (1,3): 59669.1 mas, contrast 5cell (1,4): 66.1 mas, contrast 6cell (1,5): 40347.9 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 19985.4 mas, contrast 4cell (2,1): 17961.6 mas, contrast 4cell (2,2): 37030.8 mas, contrast 4cell (2,3): 20784.8 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 21806.4 mas, contrast 5cell (2,5): 54860.5 mas, contrast 5cell (3,0): 51029.7 mas, contrast 5cell (3,1): 58995.1 mas, contrast 4cell (3,2): 59161.6 mas, contrast 4cell (3,3): 55011.2 mas, contrast 4cell (3,4): 13.3 mas, contrast 4cell (3,5): 54200.4 mas, contrast 4cell (4,0): 47359.9 mas, contrast 4cell (4,1): 58720.6 mas, contrast 4cell (4,2): 45020.6 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 15344.7 mas, contrast 3cell (5,0): 50576.9 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 37112.8 mas, contrast 4
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,3)59,669.1-55,033.0-23,060.25.033309
    (3,2)59,161.6-57,210.8-15,066.94.021970
    (3,1)58,995.1-53,516.7-24,827.14.017215
    (4,1)58,720.6-49,415.231,721.44.018379
    (3,3)55,011.2-50,668.2-21,423.64.017568
    (2,5)54,860.5-52,049.017,337.15.029576
    (3,5)54,200.4-54,200.0-200.04.014718
    (1,2)52,859.8-51,432.7-12,199.94.017718
    (3,0)51,029.7-51,019.2-1,033.85.030227
    (5,0)50,576.9-46,030.9-20,956.54.011037
    (4,0)47,359.9-41,400.0-23,000.04.021177
    (4,2)45,020.62,579.4-44,946.66.017954
    (0,5)43,804.1-17,400.040,200.04.012187
    (1,5)40,347.9-31,306.5-25,453.05.030053
    (5,1)37,112.8-30,600.0-21,000.04.011240
    (2,2)37,030.8-36,200.07,800.04.016897
    (2,4)21,806.4-13,759.316,917.55.028515
    (2,3)20,784.8-16,574.6-12,541.55.018285
    (2,0)19,985.415,075.2-13,120.84.011017
    (2,1)17,961.6-17,014.4-5,755.74.014847
    (4,3)15,344.7-8,900.0-12,500.03.02337
    (1,4)66.117.863.76.026919
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F360M visit 1: worst tile 59506.7 mas at cell (2,1) (> 15 mas)
    19/26 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    24/26 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.11 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 59333.0 mas, contrast 3cell (0,4): 55997.3 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 41614.3 mas, contrast 4cell (1,2): 53124.0 mas, contrast 4cell (1,3): 6039.2 mas, contrast 7cell (1,4): 51144.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,5): 58209.9 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 46607.9 mas, contrast 4cell (2,1): 59506.7 mas, contrast 4cell (2,2): 6.1 mas, contrast 5cell (2,3): 48642.7 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 48550.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,5): 40937.4 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 9808.9 mas, contrast 7cell (3,1): 50626.3 mas, contrast 5cell (3,2): 52907.8 mas, contrast 6cell (3,3): 12531.1 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 10.2 mas, contrast 5cell (3,5): 30674.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 45484.0 mas, contrast 5cell (4,1): 13355.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,2): 45022.1 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 42985.0 mas, contrast 5cell (5,0): 50579.4 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 36751.3 mas, contrast 5cell (5,2): 49507.2 mas, contrast 3
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (2,1)59,506.7-58,128.6-12,732.14.023079
    (0,3)59,333.0-56,600.017,800.03.06987
    (1,5)58,209.9-52,953.5-24,172.85.043236
    (0,4)55,997.3-23,361.550,891.56.038325
    (1,2)53,124.0-53,123.8-154.94.021159
    (3,2)52,907.850,963.8-14,210.46.039402
    (1,4)51,144.4-50,107.9-10,244.36.044667
    (3,1)50,626.3-43,781.425,420.75.026447
    (5,0)50,579.4-46,006.6-21,016.14.015911
    (5,2)49,507.2-31,000.038,600.03.03837
    (2,3)48,642.7-48,594.82,156.55.032459
    (2,4)48,550.1-48,339.1-4,521.96.047272
    (2,0)46,607.9-28,171.2-37,130.64.019358
    (4,0)45,484.0-41,873.9-17,758.75.029748
    (4,2)45,022.12,577.1-44,948.36.030604
    (4,3)42,985.0-21,845.6-37,020.05.013300
    (0,5)41,614.3-37,800.317,403.64.018902
    (2,5)40,937.4-40,592.95,300.06.045057
    (5,1)36,751.3-26,165.4-25,807.65.015871
    (3,5)30,674.9-30,519.3-3,086.25.022092
    (4,1)13,355.9-7,103.4-11,310.25.028774
    (3,3)12,531.12,534.412,272.26.028974
    (3,0)9,808.9537.4-9,794.27.047910
    (1,3)6,039.25,270.3-2,948.87.044781
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F405N visit 1: worst tile 34535.8 mas at cell (0,3) (> 15 mas)
    23/25 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    3/25 cells exceed 15 mas, and every one of them is on the mosaic EDGE — that is usually thin coverage (few exposures, so few pairs per cell) rather than a distortion error. Check the pair counts in the table before treating it as a defect. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.60 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 34535.8 mas, contrast 3cell (0,4): 10.2 mas, contrast 15cell (0,5): 15.5 mas, contrast 9cell (1,2): 5.7 mas, contrast 5cell (1,3): 6.8 mas, contrast 13cell (1,4): 11.1 mas, contrast 19cell (1,5): 11.4 mas, contrast 11cell (2,0): 2.8 mas, contrast 5cell (2,1): 9.2 mas, contrast 11cell (2,2): 4.9 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 2.2 mas, contrast 7cell (2,4): 5.7 mas, contrast 10cell (2,5): 9.0 mas, contrast 7cell (3,0): 11.6 mas, contrast 12cell (3,1): 6.5 mas, contrast 14cell (3,2): 4.7 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 5.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,4): 6.2 mas, contrast 9cell (3,5): 28122.6 mas, contrast 4cell (4,0): 14.5 mas, contrast 9cell (4,1): 10.2 mas, contrast 17cell (4,2): 6.2 mas, contrast 9cell (4,3): 4.8 mas, contrast 5cell (5,0): 12.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,1): 7.4 mas, contrast 7
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,3)34,535.8-25,400.0-23,400.03.04478
    (3,5)28,122.621,012.418,691.24.08853
    (0,5)15.512.09.89.0283
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F410M visit 1: worst tile 59333.0 mas at cell (0,3) (> 15 mas)
    18/26 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F410M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    21/26 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.06 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 59333.0 mas, contrast 3cell (0,4): 57078.6 mas, contrast 7cell (0,5): 47614.7 mas, contrast 4cell (1,2): 6.9 mas, contrast 4cell (1,3): 6070.2 mas, contrast 7cell (1,4): 16.8 mas, contrast 10cell (1,5): 16.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 58439.0 mas, contrast 4cell (2,1): 7.5 mas, contrast 4cell (2,2): 52994.4 mas, contrast 5cell (2,3): 51381.7 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 32266.1 mas, contrast 7cell (2,5): 27732.9 mas, contrast 7cell (3,0): 9805.8 mas, contrast 7cell (3,1): 12.9 mas, contrast 5cell (3,2): 21761.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 10.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,4): 9.3 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 33339.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 7652.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,1): 16.8 mas, contrast 8cell (4,2): 42887.6 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 42983.1 mas, contrast 5cell (5,0): 57008.5 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 56648.4 mas, contrast 4cell (5,2): 49507.2 mas, contrast 3
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,3)59,333.0-56,600.017,800.03.06219
    (2,0)58,439.0-18,600.0-55,400.04.019973
    (0,4)57,078.636,097.8-44,214.47.042101
    (5,0)57,008.5-56,950.92,562.84.016726
    (5,1)56,648.4-27,000.0-49,800.04.015235
    (2,2)52,994.4-46,723.6-25,006.35.029236
    (2,3)51,381.7-50,856.77,326.15.031187
    (5,2)49,507.2-31,000.038,600.03.04248
    (0,5)47,614.7-35,093.332,181.14.019272
    (4,3)42,983.1-21,845.1-37,018.05.014027
    (4,2)42,887.623,088.8-36,142.26.029107
    (3,5)33,339.94,675.4-33,010.55.024126
    (2,4)32,266.1-29,893.8-12,143.57.054425
    (2,5)27,732.9-25,830.010,096.07.051644
    (3,2)21,761.6-15,835.7-14,926.45.028692
    (3,0)9,805.8541.2-9,790.87.051980
    (4,0)7,652.3-6,615.23,846.65.031576
    (1,3)6,070.25,298.8-2,961.57.046904
    (4,1)16.8-10.8-12.98.0919
    (1,4)16.89.513.810.047835
    (1,5)16.214.86.56.013064
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F480M visit 1: worst tile 59333.0 mas at cell (0,3) (> 15 mas)
    20/26 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    6/26 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.09 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,3): 59333.0 mas, contrast 3cell (0,4): 9.7 mas, contrast 11cell (0,5): 14.8 mas, contrast 6cell (1,2): 4.3 mas, contrast 4cell (1,3): 6.2 mas, contrast 12cell (1,4): 12.6 mas, contrast 16cell (1,5): 12.3 mas, contrast 11cell (2,0): 34714.1 mas, contrast 4cell (2,1): 9.7 mas, contrast 12cell (2,2): 6.0 mas, contrast 9cell (2,3): 20765.8 mas, contrast 6cell (2,4): 5.2 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 9.0 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 14.4 mas, contrast 11cell (3,1): 8.2 mas, contrast 10cell (3,2): 52996.3 mas, contrast 8cell (3,3): 1.8 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 4.7 mas, contrast 8cell (3,5): 59086.8 mas, contrast 4cell (4,0): 14.3 mas, contrast 7cell (4,1): 11.5 mas, contrast 20cell (4,2): 7.7 mas, contrast 11cell (4,3): 7.6 mas, contrast 5cell (5,0): 58600.3 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 8.1 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 5.0 mas, contrast 3
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,3)59,333.0-56,600.017,800.03.05439
    (3,5)59,086.8-57,332.114,292.54.019472
    (5,0)58,600.3-51,800.027,400.04.014618
    (3,2)52,996.351,050.8-14,227.58.042613
    (2,0)34,714.1-5,442.834,284.74.018025
    (2,3)20,765.8-16,535.9-12,561.26.039433
    Existing figures
  • ok
    F140M: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_latest.json
  • ok
    F162M: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_latest.json
  • ok
    F182M: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_latest.json
  • ok
    F182M_o001: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F187N: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F187N_latest.json
  • ok
    F187N_o001: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F187N_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F210M: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_latest.json
  • ok
    F210M_o001: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F335M: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_latest.json
  • ok
    F335M_o001: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F360M: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_latest.json
  • ok
    F360M_o001: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F405N: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_latest.json
  • ok
    F405N_o001: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F410M: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F410M_latest.json
  • ok
    F410M_o001: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F410M_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F480M: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_latest.json
  • ok
    F480M_o001: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    m7 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 present (4 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    8 recent log(s), no error signatures
    logs/
  • ok
    m7: single tag 2026-09-09_PR829_1d68c84 (33 products)
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
Generated 2026-09-19 14:56 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.