Stage ladder
Products per filter
| filter | unc | cal | crf | red | i2d | sat | m12 | m3 | m4 | m5 | m6 | reduced as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F115W | 96 | 96 | · | 96 | 61 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F150W | 96 | 96 | · | 96 | 60 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F164N | 96 | 96 | · | 96 | 60 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F187N | 96 | 96 | · | 96 | 60 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F200W | 96 | 96 | · | 96 | 60 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F212N | 96 | 96 | · | 96 | 61 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F277W | 24 | 24 | · | 24 | 58 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F323N | 24 | 24 | · | 24 | 61 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F405N | 24 | 24 | · | 24 | 61 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F444W | 48 | 48 | · | 48 | 60 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
| F466N | 24 | 24 | · | 24 | 61 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | destreak |
* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this
field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to
1905/o001.
Astrometry — m2 checkpoint
| filter | visit | exposures | misaligned | swept | min contrast | bulk tie (mas) | tie from | tiles ok | worst tile (mas) | cell | checkpoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F115W_o001 | 1 | 96 | 69 | 0 | 217 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-30T20:51:39Z | ||
| F115W_o001 | 2 | 96 | 69 | 0 | 217 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-30T20:51:39Z | ||
| F115W_o001 | 3 | 96 | 69 | 0 | 217 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-30T20:51:39Z | ||
| F150W_o001 | 1 | 96 | 10 | 0 | 509 | — | —/— | — | 2026-09-12T01:51:44Z | ||
| F150W_o001 | 2 | 96 | 10 | 0 | 509 | — | —/— | — | 2026-09-12T01:51:44Z | ||
| F150W_o001 | 3 | 96 | 10 | 0 | 509 | — | —/— | — | 2026-09-12T01:51:44Z | ||
| F164N_o001 | 1 | 96 | 79 | 0 | 66 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-30T23:18:41Z | ||
| F164N_o001 | 2 | 96 | 79 | 0 | 66 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-30T23:18:41Z | ||
| F164N_o001 | 3 | 96 | 79 | 0 | 66 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-30T23:18:41Z | ||
| F187N_o001 | 1 | 96 | 65 | 0 | 62 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T00:42:02Z | ||
| F187N_o001 | 2 | 96 | 65 | 0 | 62 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T00:42:02Z | ||
| F187N_o001 | 3 | 96 | 65 | 0 | 62 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T00:42:02Z | ||
| F200W_o001 | 1 | 96 | 64 | 0 | 400 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T01:59:57Z | ||
| F200W_o001 | 2 | 96 | 64 | 0 | 400 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T01:59:57Z | ||
| F200W_o001 | 3 | 96 | 64 | 0 | 400 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T01:59:57Z | ||
| F212N_o001 | 1 | 96 | 64 | 0 | 58 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T03:15:44Z | ||
| F212N_o001 | 2 | 96 | 64 | 0 | 58 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T03:15:44Z | ||
| F212N_o001 | 3 | 96 | 64 | 0 | 58 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T03:15:44Z | ||
| F277W_o001 | 1 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 1640 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T04:30:52Z | ||
| F277W_o001 | 2 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 1640 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T04:30:52Z | ||
| F277W_o001 | 3 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 1640 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T04:30:52Z | ||
| F323N_o001 | 1 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 1061 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T04:53:09Z | ||
| F323N_o001 | 2 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 1061 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T04:53:09Z | ||
| F323N_o001 | 3 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 1061 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T04:53:09Z | ||
| F405N_o001 | 1 | 24 | 22 | 0 | 1157 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T05:10:17Z | ||
| F405N_o001 | 2 | 24 | 22 | 0 | 1157 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T05:10:17Z | ||
| F405N_o001 | 3 | 24 | 22 | 0 | 1157 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T05:10:17Z | ||
| F444W_o001 | 1 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 730 | — | —/— | — | 2026-09-12T04:29:38Z | ||
| F444W_o001 | 2 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 730 | — | —/— | — | 2026-09-12T04:29:38Z | ||
| F444W_o001 | 3 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 730 | — | —/— | — | 2026-09-12T04:29:38Z | ||
| F466N_o001 | 1 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 942 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T05:39:56Z | ||
| F466N_o001 | 2 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 942 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T05:39:56Z | ||
| F466N_o001 | 3 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 942 | — | —/— | — | 2026-08-31T05:39:56Z |
“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no
max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets
off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles
whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset.
The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against
15 mas.
Provenance
| phase | products | pipeline tag(s) |
|---|---|---|
| m7 | 36 | 2026-09-04_PR771_837e5d8-dirty (27), 2026-09-16_PR904_2ccc032-dirty (9) |
| m8 | 3 | 2026-09-16_PR904_2ccc032-dirty (3) |
Queue
No jobs in the queue for this field.
Findings
-
fail
F115W_o001: 69/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F115W_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrca1 7.9 -4.0 8.9 985.0 14316 3.0 1 nrca1 -0.7 2.2 2.3 693.0 88454 10.0 1 nrca2 -3.2 2.2 3.9 806.0 14077 3.0 1 nrca2 3.9 -0.6 3.9 569.0 14020 3.0 1 nrca2 -1.0 2.2 2.4 838.0 9792 3.0 1 nrca3 -2.5 1.7 3.1 847.0 16606 3.0 1 nrca3 4.2 -0.8 4.2 951.0 16785 3.0 1 nrca3 -1.4 2.8 3.1 925.0 17495 3.0 1 nrca4 -0.3 -3.6 3.6 796.0 14484 3.0 1 nrca4 6.5 -6.0 8.8 1,119.0 14748 3.0 1 nrca4 -4.0 3.5 5.3 1,054.0 16544 3.0 1 nrca4 -6.4 6.1 8.9 1,153.0 16787 3.0 1 nrcb1 -2.8 1.6 3.3 754.0 11168 3.0 1 nrcb1 3.9 -0.8 4.0 876.0 11466 3.0 1 nrcb1 -1.2 2.0 2.4 909.0 15127 3.0 1 nrcb2 -2.9 1.6 3.4 726.0 13099 3.0 1 nrcb2 3.8 -0.9 3.9 818.0 13035 3.0 1 nrcb2 -1.8 2.9 3.4 998.0 20169 3.0 1 nrcb3 5.9 -2.6 6.4 992.0 14138 3.0 1 nrcb3 -1.1 1.9 2.2 854.0 13003 3.0 1 nrcb4 -1.9 0.7 2.0 864.0 24021 3.0 1 nrcb4 4.9 -1.8 5.2 1,265.0 24131 3.0 1 nrcb4 -1.1 1.9 2.2 1,037.0 20299 3.0 2 nrca1 -1.7 -1.6 2.3 704.0 14984 3.0 2 nrca1 3.4 -1.1 3.5 707.0 15099 3.0 2 nrca2 4.3 -1.1 4.4 584.0 11953 3.0 2 nrca2 -1.5 10.6 10.7 723.0 71745 10.0 2 nrca2 -4.2 11.8 12.6 800.0 70987 10.0 2 nrca3 -2.0 -1.0 2.3 839.0 18910 3.0 2 nrca3 3.0 -0.5 3.1 854.0 18818 3.0 2 nrca3 0.2 5.6 5.6 634.0 19180 3.0 2 nrca3 -2.9 6.4 7.0 1,080.0 19656 3.0 2 nrca4 -2.7 -0.9 2.8 857.0 18659 3.0 2 nrca4 2.4 -0.6 2.4 838.0 18771 3.0 2 nrca4 2.0 5.2 5.6 886.0 16522 3.0 2 nrca4 -1.2 6.4 6.5 858.0 17043 3.0 2 nrcb1 -2.2 -1.0 2.5 588.0 73182 10.0 2 nrcb1 2.8 -0.8 3.0 656.0 74942 10.0 2 nrcb1 2.9 4.3 5.2 994.0 17938 3.0 2 nrcb1 -1.3 5.6 5.8 887.0 17782 3.0 showing 40 of 69
Existing figures -
fail
F150W_o001: 10/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F150W_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 3/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrcb4 0.1 3.4 3.4 1,027.5 116723 3.0 1 nrcb4 -1.5 3.2 3.5 1,661.5 116111 3.0 2 nrca1 -1.0 -5.4 5.5 2,021.0 52279 3.0 2 nrca1 -1.0 -5.4 5.4 2,056.0 51455 3.0 2 nrca3 0.5 2.0 2.1 1,713.0 62093 3.0 2 nrca3 0.6 2.1 2.2 1,727.0 62233 3.0 2 nrcb4 0.4 4.6 4.7 2,227.0 73669 3.0 2 nrcb4 -3.0 5.5 6.3 2,389.0 74742 3.0 3 nrca1 3.1 1.8 3.6 2,162.0 46424 3.0 3 nrca1 3.2 2.3 4.0 2,164.0 46562 3.0 Existing figures -
fail
F164N_o001: 79/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F164N_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrca1 2.3 13.9 14.1 585.0 34559 10.0 1 nrca1 9.4 11.2 14.6 584.0 34579 10.0 1 nrca1 3.2 17.9 18.2 88.0 5177 10.0 1 nrca1 1.0 21.6 21.6 81.0 5384 10.0 1 nrca2 1.6 5.7 5.9 330.0 28166 10.0 1 nrca2 8.6 3.0 9.1 418.0 27630 10.0 1 nrca2 -0.5 3.4 3.5 380.0 17886 10.0 1 nrca3 1.5 -3.8 4.1 566.0 38284 10.0 1 nrca3 8.5 -6.4 10.6 629.0 36440 10.0 1 nrca3 -3.0 3.9 4.9 639.0 42441 10.0 1 nrca4 -2.7 2.1 3.4 477.0 31677 10.0 1 nrca4 4.4 -0.6 4.4 521.0 31739 10.0 1 nrca4 -0.8 -3.7 3.7 344.0 33709 10.0 1 nrca4 -3.1 0.4 3.2 319.0 33597 10.0 1 nrcb1 -0.7 -2.7 2.7 439.0 22090 10.0 1 nrcb1 6.2 -5.3 8.2 482.0 21840 10.0 1 nrcb1 0.2 -6.4 6.4 313.0 31366 10.0 1 nrcb1 -2.9 -2.1 3.6 351.0 31381 10.0 1 nrcb2 -3.0 2.1 3.6 456.0 35311 10.0 1 nrcb2 4.0 -0.5 4.1 485.0 35409 10.0 1 nrcb2 -5.0 -12.4 13.4 659.0 47208 10.0 1 nrcb2 -8.0 -8.8 11.9 627.0 46387 10.0 1 nrcb3 -0.8 7.8 7.8 449.0 31246 10.0 1 nrcb3 6.3 5.2 8.2 506.0 30857 10.0 1 nrcb3 -2.5 4.9 5.5 564.0 30844 10.0 1 nrcb3 -5.5 8.9 10.5 584.0 31803 10.0 1 nrcb4 -2.8 2.3 3.7 598.0 54469 10.0 1 nrcb4 4.2 -0.3 4.2 457.0 53606 10.0 1 nrcb4 2.2 -0.4 2.2 547.0 56443 10.0 1 nrcb4 -0.6 3.2 3.3 657.0 55972 10.0 2 nrca1 2.1 4.9 5.4 576.0 46610 10.0 2 nrca1 7.5 5.7 9.4 588.0 45134 10.0 2 nrca1 -2.0 1.4 2.5 298.0 16455 10.0 2 nrca2 -0.4 2.2 2.3 299.0 34026 10.0 2 nrca2 4.9 3.0 5.8 438.0 33746 10.0 2 nrca2 -2.4 1.5 2.8 415.0 17618 10.0 2 nrca3 -3.5 -0.4 3.5 792.0 11509 3.0 2 nrca3 2.0 0.5 2.0 608.0 11194 3.0 2 nrca3 -2.7 -0.4 2.7 439.0 64810 10.0 2 nrca4 -3.6 -0.4 3.7 841.0 10740 3.0 showing 40 of 79
Existing figures -
fail
F187N_o001: 65/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F187N_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrca1 7.9 -2.7 8.3 742.0 54069 10.0 1 nrca1 -7.1 7.1 10.0 585.0 3466 3.0 1 nrca1 -9.4 10.7 14.3 592.0 30440 10.0 1 nrca2 4.1 -3.2 5.2 651.0 40753 10.0 1 nrca2 10.6 -5.8 12.1 641.0 39818 10.0 1 nrca2 2.5 -1.8 3.1 549.0 27979 10.0 1 nrca3 -1.8 1.1 2.1 544.0 58348 10.0 1 nrca3 4.7 -1.7 4.9 725.0 58950 10.0 1 nrca3 -1.5 3.5 3.8 798.0 63757 10.0 1 nrca4 4.8 -1.7 5.1 697.0 46138 10.0 1 nrca4 2.8 -2.5 3.8 566.0 48957 10.0 1 nrcb1 -2.0 0.8 2.1 461.0 31800 10.0 1 nrcb1 4.3 -1.8 4.7 584.0 33068 10.0 1 nrcb1 -2.8 2.9 4.0 664.0 47051 10.0 1 nrcb2 4.7 -1.8 5.0 714.0 50959 10.0 1 nrcb2 2.0 1.2 2.3 699.0 66848 10.0 1 nrcb2 -1.0 4.2 4.3 711.0 65751 10.0 1 nrcb3 5.5 -2.7 6.1 665.0 45498 10.0 1 nrcb3 2.5 -1.8 3.0 608.0 43731 10.0 1 nrcb4 6.5 -2.5 7.0 871.0 75056 10.0 1 nrcb4 2.5 -1.6 2.9 670.0 77814 10.0 2 nrca1 -0.5 -3.6 3.6 597.0 71255 10.0 2 nrca1 4.6 -2.4 5.2 823.0 70154 10.0 2 nrca2 -0.5 -4.1 4.2 500.0 50182 10.0 2 nrca2 4.5 -3.0 5.4 661.0 50601 10.0 2 nrca3 3.2 0.4 3.2 782.0 15045 3.0 2 nrca3 0.9 2.7 2.8 720.0 10152 3.0 2 nrca3 -1.8 3.4 3.8 861.0 9917 3.0 2 nrca4 -1.8 -0.9 2.0 1,044.0 15338 3.0 2 nrca4 3.2 0.3 3.2 768.0 15467 3.0 2 nrca4 1.1 2.3 2.6 749.0 87661 10.0 2 nrca4 -1.6 3.2 3.6 856.0 86075 10.0 2 nrcb1 3.1 0.2 3.1 371.0 30706 10.0 2 nrcb1 1.2 2.4 2.7 723.0 65550 10.0 2 nrcb1 -2.0 3.3 3.9 776.0 67387 10.0 2 nrcb2 -1.8 -1.0 2.1 461.0 30648 10.0 2 nrcb2 3.1 0.2 3.1 313.0 30734 10.0 2 nrcb2 0.8 3.6 3.7 540.0 55512 10.0 2 nrcb2 -2.5 4.3 5.0 672.0 56895 10.0 2 nrcb3 -0.8 -3.4 3.5 791.0 87115 10.0 showing 40 of 65
Existing figures -
fail
F200W_o001: 64/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F200W_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrca1 6.1 -4.2 7.4 1,371.8 272562 3.0 1 nrca1 -1.9 3.3 3.8 1,699.3 222157 3.0 1 nrca2 -1.2 1.7 2.1 1,258.7 258340 3.0 1 nrca2 5.5 -1.2 5.6 1,567.3 259311 3.0 1 nrca2 -2.3 3.3 4.0 1,632.7 214161 3.0 1 nrca3 -3.8 2.7 4.7 1,372.0 237267 3.0 1 nrca3 2.9 -0.1 2.9 986.7 236985 3.0 1 nrca3 -2.3 3.1 3.8 1,299.0 270663 3.0 1 nrca4 -3.7 2.7 4.5 1,490.7 259788 3.0 1 nrca4 3.1 -0.2 3.1 990.2 261846 3.0 1 nrca4 -2.0 4.0 4.4 1,409.0 297016 3.0 1 nrcb1 -2.8 -2.1 3.5 1,674.7 223462 3.0 1 nrcb1 4.2 -5.1 6.6 1,686.0 223684 3.0 1 nrcb1 -2.8 3.0 4.1 1,738.7 260600 3.0 1 nrcb2 2.1 -1.9 2.8 1,305.7 232934 3.0 1 nrcb2 9.1 -4.8 10.3 1,643.0 235957 3.0 1 nrcb2 -2.9 2.9 4.1 1,204.0 299748 3.0 1 nrcb3 -1.2 3.8 4.0 1,262.0 267286 3.0 1 nrcb3 5.7 0.8 5.8 1,001.5 266700 3.0 1 nrcb3 -2.2 3.1 3.8 1,726.3 248873 3.0 1 nrcb4 -1.6 2.2 2.7 1,202.2 304126 3.0 1 nrcb4 5.4 -0.6 5.4 1,074.5 305316 3.0 1 nrcb4 -2.1 3.0 3.7 1,757.7 258320 3.0 2 nrca1 -2.2 -2.9 3.6 1,938.5 169695 3.0 2 nrca1 2.5 -2.4 3.4 1,939.5 169640 3.0 2 nrca2 -2.8 -4.5 5.4 1,360.7 192865 3.0 2 nrca2 1.7 -4.2 4.5 1,321.0 194190 3.0 2 nrca3 -2.1 -0.2 2.1 572.0 124036 3.0 2 nrca3 2.7 0.3 2.7 917.5 124300 3.0 2 nrca3 0.8 2.6 2.8 1,291.5 181063 3.0 2 nrca3 -1.9 3.5 4.0 1,943.0 181670 3.0 2 nrca4 -2.2 -0.2 2.2 1,248.0 134893 3.0 2 nrca4 2.5 0.2 2.5 1,124.0 134382 3.0 2 nrca4 -1.9 2.4 3.0 1,395.3 195515 3.0 2 nrcb1 -2.2 -0.1 2.2 1,234.0 137580 3.0 2 nrcb1 2.7 0.1 2.7 1,131.0 137263 3.0 2 nrcb1 -2.7 2.3 3.6 1,555.0 217926 3.0 2 nrcb2 -2.2 -0.2 2.2 1,317.0 170245 3.0 2 nrcb2 2.6 0.2 2.6 1,204.0 169658 3.0 2 nrcb2 -2.9 2.7 3.9 1,587.0 139307 3.0 showing 40 of 64
Existing figures -
fail
F212N_o001: 64/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F212N_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrca1 8.3 -2.4 8.6 854.0 70150 10.0 1 nrca1 -0.7 3.5 3.6 603.0 40194 10.0 1 nrca2 6.1 -2.0 6.4 689.0 48334 10.0 1 nrca2 -0.8 3.5 3.6 564.0 35016 10.0 1 nrca3 -1.0 -3.4 3.5 781.0 77201 10.0 1 nrca3 5.6 -6.2 8.4 895.0 75775 10.0 1 nrca3 -1.1 4.4 4.6 841.0 83441 10.0 1 nrca4 0.5 -4.5 4.5 569.0 57536 10.0 1 nrca4 7.0 -7.4 10.2 794.0 58673 10.0 1 nrca4 -2.1 4.3 4.8 731.0 60904 10.0 1 nrcb1 -3.2 2.6 4.1 651.0 40875 10.0 1 nrcb1 3.4 -0.4 3.4 541.0 42930 10.0 1 nrcb1 -3.1 5.2 6.0 782.0 59513 10.0 1 nrcb2 -2.9 2.8 4.0 839.0 65621 10.0 1 nrcb2 3.7 -0.2 3.7 574.0 66458 10.0 1 nrcb2 -3.2 4.7 5.7 944.0 86053 10.0 1 nrcb2 -5.4 8.4 10.0 959.0 85804 10.0 1 nrcb3 4.8 -2.1 5.2 753.0 57328 10.0 1 nrcb3 -0.8 3.4 3.5 644.0 55431 10.0 1 nrcb4 -3.8 3.0 4.9 835.0 9628 3.0 1 nrcb4 2.8 -0.1 2.8 508.0 9601 3.0 1 nrcb4 -0.9 3.3 3.5 884.0 10204 3.0 2 nrca1 -0.8 -3.3 3.4 803.0 12420 3.0 2 nrca1 4.0 -2.8 4.9 974.0 12029 3.0 2 nrca2 -1.4 -4.1 4.3 742.0 71568 10.0 2 nrca2 3.3 -3.5 4.8 802.0 70022 10.0 2 nrca3 -2.0 -0.5 2.1 1,042.0 21939 3.0 2 nrca3 2.7 0.0 2.7 699.0 21766 3.0 2 nrca3 1.0 2.6 2.8 869.0 14999 3.0 2 nrca3 -1.9 2.9 3.5 1,032.0 15109 3.0 2 nrca4 -2.1 -0.6 2.1 1,168.0 21976 3.0 2 nrca4 2.6 -0.0 2.6 684.0 21409 3.0 2 nrca4 1.1 2.9 3.1 895.0 13074 3.0 2 nrca4 -1.8 3.2 3.7 1,000.0 12716 3.0 2 nrcb1 -2.0 -0.6 2.1 581.0 38853 10.0 2 nrcb1 2.6 -0.2 2.7 432.0 40198 10.0 2 nrcb1 1.2 3.1 3.3 820.0 87900 10.0 2 nrcb1 -2.3 3.6 4.3 879.0 86510 10.0 2 nrcb2 -2.0 -0.7 2.1 549.0 41602 10.0 2 nrcb2 2.7 -0.3 2.7 465.0 41365 10.0 showing 40 of 64
Existing figures -
fail
F277W_o001: 23/24 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F277W_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrcalong 1.3 4.7 4.8 2,614.0 209532 3.0 1 nrcalong 8.1 2.1 8.3 2,832.3 208918 3.0 1 nrcalong 1.0 9.1 9.2 2,566.0 217129 3.0 1 nrcalong -1.4 11.8 11.9 2,743.0 217064 3.0 1 nrcblong -3.2 -8.3 8.8 3,207.0 239472 3.0 1 nrcblong 3.6 -10.7 11.3 3,221.3 238641 3.0 1 nrcblong -1.0 -4.5 4.6 2,823.7 238016 3.0 1 nrcblong -3.4 -2.1 4.0 3,040.0 236377 3.0 2 nrcalong 5.3 1.7 5.5 3,983.0 86844 3.0 2 nrcalong 1.7 11.0 11.1 2,896.5 130831 3.0 2 nrcalong -1.1 12.0 12.1 2,709.0 130578 3.0 2 nrcblong -2.8 -11.9 12.2 3,365.5 152712 3.0 2 nrcblong 2.3 -11.6 11.8 3,334.5 152830 3.0 2 nrcblong -0.3 -2.4 2.4 1,639.5 112608 3.0 2 nrcblong -4.2 -1.2 4.4 2,350.5 112939 3.0 3 nrcalong -2.6 3.9 4.7 3,354.0 160354 3.0 3 nrcalong -2.3 3.2 4.0 3,360.5 162134 3.0 3 nrcalong 4.0 9.6 10.4 3,935.5 178396 3.0 3 nrcalong 4.6 9.9 10.9 3,977.0 177260 3.0 3 nrcblong -6.5 -8.5 10.7 2,723.3 189492 3.0 3 nrcblong -5.9 -9.4 11.1 2,739.7 189741 3.0 3 nrcblong 2.3 -3.5 4.2 2,727.0 203534 3.0 3 nrcblong 2.3 -3.3 4.0 2,709.3 202412 3.0 Existing figures -
fail
F323N_o001: 23/24 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F323N_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrcalong 1.5 3.9 4.2 1,552.0 71227 10.0 1 nrcalong 8.5 1.3 8.6 1,542.0 70920 10.0 1 nrcalong 1.1 7.7 7.8 1,373.0 65243 10.0 1 nrcalong -1.1 11.7 11.8 1,403.0 64054 10.0 1 nrcblong -4.1 -7.9 8.9 1,903.0 84359 10.0 1 nrcblong 2.8 -10.4 10.8 1,898.0 86222 10.0 1 nrcblong -1.6 -5.0 5.3 1,923.0 11050 3.0 1 nrcblong -4.7 -1.2 4.8 1,826.0 11058 3.0 2 nrcalong 5.9 1.5 6.1 1,894.0 12510 3.0 2 nrcalong 2.4 10.3 10.6 1,656.0 81649 10.0 2 nrcalong -0.4 11.8 11.8 1,128.0 80165 10.0 2 nrcblong -4.4 -11.4 12.2 1,846.0 87619 10.0 2 nrcblong 1.1 -10.3 10.3 1,615.0 88078 10.0 2 nrcblong -1.4 -2.2 2.6 1,944.0 14555 3.0 2 nrcblong -5.2 -0.6 5.2 1,674.0 14429 3.0 3 nrcalong -2.5 3.7 4.5 1,502.0 65770 10.0 3 nrcalong -2.0 3.5 4.1 1,441.0 63955 10.0 3 nrcalong 3.8 8.9 9.7 1,525.0 58019 10.0 3 nrcalong 4.3 9.5 10.5 1,535.0 59326 10.0 3 nrcblong -6.8 -8.5 10.9 1,403.0 51430 10.0 3 nrcblong -6.0 -8.6 10.5 1,413.0 51885 10.0 3 nrcblong 2.0 -4.2 4.6 1,500.0 62919 10.0 3 nrcblong 2.0 -3.6 4.1 1,466.0 62896 10.0 Existing figures -
fail
F405N_o001: 22/24 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F405N_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrcalong 1.6 3.8 4.1 1,536.0 68452 10.0 1 nrcalong 8.1 1.1 8.2 1,430.0 68947 10.0 1 nrcalong 0.5 8.1 8.1 1,157.0 62591 10.0 1 nrcalong -2.0 11.6 11.8 1,562.0 64344 10.0 1 nrcblong -3.2 -7.4 8.1 1,960.0 9784 3.0 1 nrcblong 3.1 -10.1 10.6 1,976.0 90739 10.0 1 nrcblong -0.5 -4.4 4.4 1,500.0 11226 3.0 1 nrcblong -3.4 -1.1 3.6 1,856.0 11502 3.0 2 nrcalong 5.8 1.8 6.0 2,053.0 14819 3.0 2 nrcalong 1.3 11.4 11.4 1,590.0 88343 10.0 2 nrcalong -1.2 12.1 12.2 1,528.0 87505 10.0 2 nrcblong -3.2 -11.2 11.7 1,983.0 12722 3.0 2 nrcblong 1.7 -10.2 10.3 1,865.0 12819 3.0 2 nrcblong -3.9 -0.6 3.9 1,806.0 17062 3.0 3 nrcalong -2.7 3.6 4.5 1,478.0 63017 10.0 3 nrcalong -2.1 3.2 3.8 1,420.0 63121 10.0 3 nrcalong 3.8 9.6 10.3 1,518.0 58672 10.0 3 nrcalong 4.0 10.2 11.0 1,522.0 58327 10.0 3 nrcblong -7.4 -8.7 11.4 1,511.0 58745 10.0 3 nrcblong -6.5 -9.1 11.2 1,521.0 58038 10.0 3 nrcblong 2.1 -3.5 4.1 1,542.0 67841 10.0 3 nrcblong 2.1 -3.2 3.8 1,566.0 69977 10.0 Existing figures -
fail
F466N_o001: 24/24 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensusAn exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.checkpoint_m2_F466N_o001_latest.json
what is affected, and why
Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved. Misaligned by detectorvisit detector dRA (mas) dDec (mas) off (mas) contrast pairs window ("") 1 nrcalong 2.0 3.7 4.3 1,223.0 43181 10.0 1 nrcalong 8.7 0.8 8.7 1,040.0 5242 3.0 1 nrcalong 0.9 8.0 8.1 942.0 38639 10.0 1 nrcalong -0.9 11.6 11.6 960.0 38590 10.0 1 nrcblong -4.2 -7.4 8.5 1,314.0 40433 10.0 1 nrcblong 2.4 -10.2 10.5 1,289.0 42072 10.0 1 nrcblong -1.5 -4.4 4.7 1,301.0 48809 10.0 1 nrcblong -3.8 -0.8 3.9 1,122.0 48472 10.0 2 nrcalong 1.2 1.7 2.1 1,585.0 13367 3.0 2 nrcalong 5.9 2.2 6.3 1,885.0 13179 3.0 2 nrcalong 2.4 12.5 12.7 1,435.0 64330 10.0 2 nrcalong -0.4 12.7 12.7 974.0 65128 10.0 2 nrcblong -4.2 -11.8 12.5 1,562.0 67448 10.0 2 nrcblong 0.5 -11.4 11.4 1,093.0 66209 10.0 2 nrcblong -1.3 -2.0 2.3 1,632.0 13288 3.0 2 nrcblong -4.6 -1.6 4.9 1,831.0 13471 3.0 3 nrcalong -1.6 4.1 4.4 1,099.0 41998 10.0 3 nrcalong -1.6 3.8 4.1 1,130.0 42627 10.0 3 nrcalong 4.1 9.5 10.4 1,254.0 38304 10.0 3 nrcalong 4.8 10.1 11.1 1,264.0 37827 10.0 3 nrcblong -7.9 -8.6 11.7 1,087.0 30130 10.0 3 nrcblong -7.6 -8.9 11.8 1,088.0 29463 10.0 3 nrcblong 1.6 -4.5 4.7 1,052.0 34968 10.0 3 nrcblong 1.6 -3.8 4.1 1,018.0 34264 10.0 Existing figures -
warn
m7: products come from 2 different pipeline tags (unattributed)2026-09-04_PR771_837e5d8-dirty (27), 2026-09-16_PR904_2ccc032-dirty (9). Image and catalog must be deployed from the SAME pipeline run; a mixed-tag set is not releasable as one product. NOTE: the sidecars carry no observation token and this field has several observations, so the mix may span them rather than sitting inside this one.catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
what is affected, and why
This happens when filters are re-run at different times and only some are regenerated — a partial rerun, or a merge that picked up an older per-filter product. The fix is to re-run the lagging filters at the current tag, not to re-stamp: the tag records which code wrote the numbers.Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)pipeline tag products 2026-09-04_PR771_837e5d8-dirty 27 2026-09-16_PR904_2ccc032-dirty 9 Existing figures -
warn
m7: 36 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tagThe tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
what is affected, and why
Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)Existing figures -
warn
m8: 3 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tagThe tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
what is affected, and why
Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)Existing figures -
warn
2 different CRDS contexts among the sampled frames: jwst_1568.pmap, jwst_1594.pmapFrames calibrated against different CRDS contexts do not share one WCS solution — distortion and filteroffset references differ between them. A catalog built from the mixture carries whichever each frame got. (Sampled, so this is a lower bound on the spread.)FITS header CRDS_CTX
what is affected, and why
Frames from different reduction epochs are co-resident in the filter directory. Distortion and filteroffset references differ between contexts, so positions from the two generations do not share one solution — and an apparent inter-module or inter-visit offset can be entirely this. Re-reduce the older frames, or move them out of the globbed directory.filter CRDS_CTX frames sampled F115W jwst_1568.pmap 4 F150W jwst_1594.pmap 4 F164N jwst_1568.pmap 4 F187N jwst_1568.pmap 4 F200W jwst_1568.pmap 4 F212N jwst_1568.pmap 4 F277W jwst_1568.pmap 4 F323N jwst_1568.pmap 4 F405N jwst_1568.pmap 4 F444W jwst_1594.pmap 4 F466N jwst_1568.pmap 4 Existing figures -
warn
m7: only an untagged cross-band product existsThis field has several observations but the product carries no _o<obs> token, so it cannot be attributed to one of them.catalogs/
what is affected, and why
Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)Existing figures -
warn
m8: only an untagged cross-band product existsThis field has several observations but the product carries no _o<obs> token, so it cannot be attributed to one of them.catalogs/
what is affected, and why
Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)Existing figures -
ok
F444W_o001: all 48 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensuscheckpoint_m2_F444W_o001_latest.json
-
ok
8 recent log(s), no error signatureslogs/
-
ok
m8: single tag 2026-09-16_PR904_2ccc032-dirty (3 products)catalogs/*m8*.prov.json