jwst-gc pipeline monitor

sgra · 2026-09-19 14:56 EDT
1 runs 1 failing 0 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

sgra 1939/o001 19d ago
1 fail11 warn
F115WF212NF405N

Cutout runs

Every cutout run on disk: the shared monitor5as probes plus the hand-made experiment cutouts. A cutout run stops after m6 — m7 and m8 need more than one filter — so "catalogs" here counts per-filter products only. These rows also flag zero-byte products and orphan tmp* files: a write that died mid-flight leaves both, and a count-based ladder reads them as finished work.

fieldlabelframescatalogs filterstouchedflags
sgramonitor5as 1221 F212N:12 48d ago

Detail

sgra · 1939/o001

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/sgra back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F115W9696·9660133333destreak
F212N9696·9660133333destreak
F405N2424·2460133333destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 1939/o001.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F115W 1 96 30 0 307 46.54 same-star 36/36 14853.0 (1,3) 2026-07-28T05:44:26Z
F115W_o001 1 96 1 0 327 0.41 same-star 36/36 33.2 (1,3) 2026-08-28T15:02:36Z
F212N 1 96 0 0 207 48.49 36/36 9279.2 (3,4) 2026-07-20T06:46:58Z
F212N_o001 1 96 0 0 212 1.75 same-star 36/36 8022.0 (3,4) 2026-08-28T17:18:37Z
F405N 1 24 0 0 660 49.41 36/36 5276.2 (3,3) 2026-07-20T05:00:13Z
F405N_o001 1 24 0 0 627 0.65 same-star 36/36 177.2 (2,3) 2026-08-28T19:20:06Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

phaseproductspipeline tag(s)
m7122026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty (12)
m832026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty (3)

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • fail
    F115W_o001: 1/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_o001_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 1/8 detectors — confined to nrca2, which points at a detector-local defect (distortion reference, a bad filteroffset, or one chip's frames never re-aligned) rather than a whole-frame misalignment. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrca2 visit 1: dRA -1.8, dDec -1.2 masnrca1 nrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±2 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrca21/12
    nrca10/12
    nrca30/12
    nrca40/12
    nrcb10/12
    nrcb20/12
    nrcb30/12
    nrcb40/12
    Diagnostic writeupD2 — internal astrometric repeatability · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrca2-1.8-1.22.2752.0179183.0
    Existing figures
  • warn
    m7: 12 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    m8: 3 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupfull diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F115W: 30/96 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus (checkpoint predates the frames)
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues. NOTE: the reduced frames are NEWER than this checkpoint, so the correction it triggered has probably already been applied — re-run the m2 checkpoint to confirm rather than treating this as current.
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 4/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrcb1 visit 1: dRA 1.5, dDec 1.7 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -1.5, dDec 2.6 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -0.6, dDec 3.1 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -1.9, dDec -3.1 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 3.7, dDec -3.0 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 2.7, dDec -0.3 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -2.0, dDec 2.7 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -1.7, dDec -3.0 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -1.7, dDec 2.6 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -0.8, dDec 3.0 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -1.9, dDec -3.3 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 3.6, dDec -3.2 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 2.5, dDec -0.6 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -2.3, dDec 2.8 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -2.0, dDec -3.0 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 1.7, dDec 1.9 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -1.5, dDec 2.9 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -0.5, dDec 3.3 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -1.9, dDec -3.2 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 4.0, dDec -3.0 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 2.9, dDec -0.2 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -1.9, dDec 3.1 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -1.5, dDec -2.6 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -1.7, dDec 2.7 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -0.8, dDec 3.1 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -2.2, dDec -3.0 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 3.6, dDec -3.1 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 2.5, dDec -0.5 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -2.2, dDec 2.7 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -1.7, dDec -3.2 masnrca1 nrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±4 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrcb18/12
    nrcb38/12
    nrcb27/12
    nrcb47/12
    nrca10/12
    nrca20/12
    nrca30/12
    nrca40/12
    Diagnostic writeupD2 — internal astrometric repeatability · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrcb11.51.72.31,036.02274473.0
    1nrcb1-1.52.63.01,071.72283793.0
    1nrcb1-0.63.13.2907.32265703.0
    1nrcb1-1.9-3.13.61,065.02117433.0
    1nrcb13.7-3.04.81,091.02147193.0
    1nrcb12.7-0.32.7711.32137773.0
    1nrcb1-2.02.73.41,124.72325413.0
    1nrcb1-1.7-3.03.51,122.02322543.0
    1nrcb2-1.72.63.11,086.01125663.0
    1nrcb2-0.83.03.1938.01109823.0
    1nrcb2-1.9-3.33.81,129.01118693.0
    1nrcb23.6-3.24.81,107.01089923.0
    1nrcb22.5-0.62.6852.51088093.0
    1nrcb2-2.32.83.61,061.01047213.0
    1nrcb2-2.0-3.03.61,083.51052683.0
    1nrcb31.71.92.61,127.01527923.0
    1nrcb3-1.52.93.31,181.01509963.0
    1nrcb3-0.53.33.3990.51519113.0
    1nrcb3-1.9-3.23.7879.31864163.0
    1nrcb34.0-3.04.91,244.01559713.0
    1nrcb32.9-0.22.9791.01588613.0
    1nrcb3-1.93.13.71,074.51246883.0
    1nrcb3-1.5-2.63.01,064.01243743.0
    1nrcb4-1.72.73.21,021.01893283.0
    1nrcb4-0.83.13.2886.71873213.0
    1nrcb4-2.2-3.03.71,534.51570403.0
    1nrcb43.6-3.14.71,539.51520653.0
    1nrcb42.5-0.52.61,087.01509263.0
    1nrcb4-2.22.73.51,033.31822803.0
    1nrcb4-1.7-3.23.71,548.01816793.0
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F212N visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F405N visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F115W visit 1: worst tile 14853.0 mas at cell (1,3) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 46.54 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 54.2 mas, contrast 33cell (0,1): 49.7 mas, contrast 28cell (0,2): 36.7 mas, contrast 36cell (0,3): 14844.4 mas, contrast 10cell (0,4): 14842.1 mas, contrast 9cell (0,5): 14838.4 mas, contrast 14cell (1,0): 49.0 mas, contrast 36cell (1,1): 49.3 mas, contrast 54cell (1,2): 51.6 mas, contrast 20cell (1,3): 14853.0 mas, contrast 9cell (1,4): 14837.5 mas, contrast 8cell (1,5): 14840.0 mas, contrast 11cell (2,0): 51.5 mas, contrast 58cell (2,1): 49.8 mas, contrast 30cell (2,2): 41.9 mas, contrast 42cell (2,3): 7980.5 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 14828.9 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 14839.7 mas, contrast 8cell (3,0): 55.6 mas, contrast 44cell (3,1): 45.5 mas, contrast 39cell (3,2): 41.3 mas, contrast 20cell (3,3): 9673.8 mas, contrast 8cell (3,4): 9780.4 mas, contrast 8cell (3,5): 14835.4 mas, contrast 8cell (4,0): 53.4 mas, contrast 43cell (4,1): 47.2 mas, contrast 52cell (4,2): 49.1 mas, contrast 34cell (4,3): 14832.5 mas, contrast 10cell (4,4): 9731.0 mas, contrast 8cell (4,5): 14839.1 mas, contrast 10cell (5,0): 69.5 mas, contrast 28cell (5,1): 55.0 mas, contrast 43cell (5,2): 47.9 mas, contrast 21cell (5,3): 14828.4 mas, contrast 11cell (5,4): 14829.4 mas, contrast 8cell (5,5): 14839.4 mas, contrast 7
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,3)14,853.08,932.011,867.39.11145560
    (0,3)14,844.48,938.811,851.310.21154974
    (0,4)14,842.18,926.411,857.88.71836882
    (1,5)14,840.08,924.311,856.810.51718542
    (2,5)14,839.78,924.411,856.38.21433785
    (5,5)14,839.48,918.911,860.17.21405652
    (4,5)14,839.18,920.711,858.410.31324317
    (0,5)14,838.48,924.811,854.413.61203737
    (1,4)14,837.58,921.811,855.47.91625653
    (3,5)14,835.48,916.711,856.78.21632512
    (4,3)14,832.58,922.111,849.010.2583598
    (5,4)14,829.48,916.911,849.18.51048350
    (2,4)14,828.98,920.011,846.18.0902998
    (5,3)14,828.48,914.011,849.910.8420947
    (3,4)9,780.4-6,638.17,182.78.035234
    (4,4)9,731.06,300.4-7,416.08.070768
    (3,3)9,673.8-2,103.2-9,442.48.060059
    (2,3)7,980.5-7,234.2-3,369.65.0125672
    (5,0)69.5-69.34.928.037322
    (3,0)55.6-55.18.144.029994
    (5,1)55.0-54.7-5.743.040616
    (0,0)54.2-53.87.233.041988
    (4,0)53.4-53.25.043.044658
    (1,2)51.6-50.1-12.119.597447
    (2,0)51.5-50.3-10.758.033644
    (2,1)49.8-49.46.130.052019
    (0,1)49.7-48.610.628.5102637
    (1,1)49.3-48.39.654.065633
    (4,2)49.1-48.75.834.028219
    (1,0)49.0-48.1-9.436.032468
    (5,2)47.9-47.0-9.721.025340
    (4,1)47.2-47.04.352.032200
    (3,1)45.5-45.3-4.939.024580
    (2,2)41.9-40.411.342.084681
    (3,2)41.3-40.8-6.220.031536
    (0,2)36.7-35.4-9.936.059085
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F115W_o001 visit 1: worst tile 33.2 mas at cell (1,3) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_o001_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    20/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.41 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 13.5 mas, contrast 35cell (0,1): 13.7 mas, contrast 26cell (0,2): 21.6 mas, contrast 35cell (0,3): 24.8 mas, contrast 30cell (0,4): 22.1 mas, contrast 24cell (0,5): 19.7 mas, contrast 23cell (1,0): 12.8 mas, contrast 35cell (1,1): 14.4 mas, contrast 33cell (1,2): 13.9 mas, contrast 16cell (1,3): 33.2 mas, contrast 16cell (1,4): 7.6 mas, contrast 13cell (1,5): 21.1 mas, contrast 23cell (2,0): 11.2 mas, contrast 39cell (2,1): 17.8 mas, contrast 33cell (2,2): 15.3 mas, contrast 25cell (2,3): 14.2 mas, contrast 22cell (2,4): 18.9 mas, contrast 17cell (2,5): 19.0 mas, contrast 17cell (3,0): 13.5 mas, contrast 43cell (3,1): 13.1 mas, contrast 40cell (3,2): 26.5 mas, contrast 19cell (3,3): 21.5 mas, contrast 7cell (3,4): 20.4 mas, contrast 12cell (3,5): 17.8 mas, contrast 14cell (4,0): 16.7 mas, contrast 46cell (4,1): 6.6 mas, contrast 39cell (4,2): 7.6 mas, contrast 25cell (4,3): 9.9 mas, contrast 16cell (4,4): 25.3 mas, contrast 10cell (4,5): 22.6 mas, contrast 18cell (5,0): 16.9 mas, contrast 34cell (5,1): 12.0 mas, contrast 32cell (5,2): 4.8 mas, contrast 11cell (5,3): 20.2 mas, contrast 19cell (5,4): 13.8 mas, contrast 14cell (5,5): 20.0 mas, contrast 11
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,3)33.221.825.116.0114457
    (3,2)26.5-18.419.119.030488
    (4,4)25.3-13.7-21.39.591336
    (0,3)24.818.716.330.088321
    (4,5)22.6-18.313.218.3183554
    (0,4)22.118.012.723.5177823
    (0,2)21.618.7-10.735.078073
    (3,3)21.5-16.613.77.026205
    (1,5)21.118.011.022.7193610
    (3,4)20.48.318.612.048782
    (5,3)20.2-18.0-9.219.065412
    (5,5)20.0-14.014.311.3196544
    (0,5)19.717.8-8.423.0118631
    (2,5)19.015.011.617.0187152
    (2,4)18.917.76.417.0123548
    (2,1)17.8-12.612.633.055803
    (3,5)17.8-11.113.913.7221851
    (5,0)16.9-13.7-9.934.028910
    (4,0)16.7-15.66.046.052227
    (2,2)15.3-5.9-14.125.075723
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F212N visit 1: worst tile 9279.2 mas at cell (3,4) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 48.49 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 49.2 mas, contrast 15cell (0,1): 45.2 mas, contrast 13cell (0,2): 41.5 mas, contrast 14cell (0,3): 38.3 mas, contrast 13cell (0,4): 46.6 mas, contrast 12cell (0,5): 40.1 mas, contrast 19cell (1,0): 42.6 mas, contrast 28cell (1,1): 41.2 mas, contrast 17cell (1,2): 52.5 mas, contrast 12cell (1,3): 40.4 mas, contrast 9cell (1,4): 42.3 mas, contrast 9cell (1,5): 32.3 mas, contrast 15cell (2,0): 48.4 mas, contrast 28cell (2,1): 46.2 mas, contrast 21cell (2,2): 48.6 mas, contrast 11cell (2,3): 43.4 mas, contrast 8cell (2,4): 36.4 mas, contrast 9cell (2,5): 34.5 mas, contrast 13cell (3,0): 47.6 mas, contrast 24cell (3,1): 47.0 mas, contrast 30cell (3,2): 45.6 mas, contrast 16cell (3,3): 53.1 mas, contrast 10cell (3,4): 9279.2 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 54.1 mas, contrast 13cell (4,0): 52.7 mas, contrast 22cell (4,1): 49.3 mas, contrast 31cell (4,2): 46.0 mas, contrast 20cell (4,3): 46.5 mas, contrast 10cell (4,4): 47.0 mas, contrast 8cell (4,5): 38.5 mas, contrast 9cell (5,0): 55.3 mas, contrast 20cell (5,1): 52.1 mas, contrast 16cell (5,2): 49.1 mas, contrast 24cell (5,3): 46.6 mas, contrast 13cell (5,4): 45.8 mas, contrast 13cell (5,5): 48.6 mas, contrast 10
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (3,4)9,279.2-7,961.84,765.95.5139761
    (5,0)55.3-54.8-7.020.5112146
    (3,5)54.1-53.93.813.038605
    (3,3)53.1-41.732.99.5119117
    (4,0)52.7-52.54.621.7179767
    (1,2)52.5-49.4-17.712.5268276
    (5,1)52.1-51.9-4.416.5110060
    (4,1)49.3-49.3-2.631.0127049
    (0,0)49.2-48.8-6.315.0260830
    (5,2)49.1-46.7-14.924.085501
    (2,2)48.6-41.125.910.7242988
    (5,5)48.6-48.5-3.810.028512
    (2,0)48.4-46.9-11.828.5125468
    (3,0)47.6-47.35.024.0102377
    (4,4)47.0-44.0-16.78.3213333
    (3,1)47.0-47.0-2.329.5112530
    (5,3)46.6-42.3-19.713.0235161
    (0,4)46.6-46.4-4.512.030177
    (4,3)46.5-42.3-19.210.0213033
    (2,1)46.2-44.412.820.7238095
    (4,2)46.0-45.5-6.519.594473
    (5,4)45.8-45.6-4.313.027871
    (3,2)45.6-42.217.315.5148439
    (0,1)45.2-44.95.613.032725
    (2,3)43.4-40.5-15.48.3256619
    (1,0)42.6-41.8-8.628.5168495
    (1,4)42.3-35.5-23.09.4399088
    (0,2)41.5-38.4-15.614.3193336
    (1,1)41.2-39.2-12.616.8318119
    (1,3)40.4-34.8-20.68.8281368
    (0,5)40.1-38.411.319.0247580
    (4,5)38.5-37.6-8.29.030775
    (0,3)38.3-35.2-15.013.0221460
    (2,4)36.4-35.6-7.69.038567
    (2,5)34.5-34.3-3.113.034742
    (1,5)32.3-31.37.915.034840
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F212N_o001 visit 1: worst tile 8022.0 mas at cell (3,4) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_o001_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    16/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 1.75 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 17.3 mas, contrast 14cell (0,1): 9.7 mas, contrast 15cell (0,2): 22.5 mas, contrast 12cell (0,3): 29.9 mas, contrast 12cell (0,4): 14.5 mas, contrast 10cell (0,5): 19.9 mas, contrast 15cell (1,0): 17.5 mas, contrast 24cell (1,1): 22.3 mas, contrast 16cell (1,2): 14.1 mas, contrast 10cell (1,3): 35.8 mas, contrast 7cell (1,4): 9.9 mas, contrast 12cell (1,5): 14.8 mas, contrast 14cell (2,0): 8.4 mas, contrast 22cell (2,1): 11.5 mas, contrast 18cell (2,2): 33.6 mas, contrast 11cell (2,3): 31.3 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 17.5 mas, contrast 9cell (2,5): 12.6 mas, contrast 13cell (3,0): 6.6 mas, contrast 20cell (3,1): 11.0 mas, contrast 23cell (3,2): 33.2 mas, contrast 16cell (3,3): 36.2 mas, contrast 8cell (3,4): 8022.0 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 8.1 mas, contrast 11cell (4,0): 9.6 mas, contrast 19cell (4,1): 8.8 mas, contrast 24cell (4,2): 12.0 mas, contrast 16cell (4,3): 21.1 mas, contrast 10cell (4,4): 6.1 mas, contrast 9cell (4,5): 9.0 mas, contrast 9cell (5,0): 14.6 mas, contrast 20cell (5,1): 12.6 mas, contrast 18cell (5,2): 19.3 mas, contrast 24cell (5,3): 11.1 mas, contrast 10cell (5,4): 8.3 mas, contrast 10cell (5,5): 29.7 mas, contrast 9
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (3,4)8,022.0-5,844.25,495.36.5140358
    (3,3)36.213.733.57.5118966
    (1,3)35.827.1-23.57.2283021
    (2,2)33.617.029.011.0243500
    (3,2)33.2-23.123.915.5150239
    (2,3)31.318.4-25.35.2258553
    (0,3)29.927.6-11.512.0222175
    (5,5)29.727.1-12.09.0314579
    (0,2)22.516.7-15.012.0194828
    (1,1)22.319.0-11.715.5320651
    (4,3)21.111.6-17.59.7213830
    (0,5)19.914.213.915.3249183
    (5,2)19.312.1-15.024.085748
    (2,4)17.511.8-13.09.038663
    (1,0)17.515.7-7.623.5171540
    (0,0)17.3-12.312.114.0263573
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F405N visit 1: worst tile 5276.2 mas at cell (3,3) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 49.41 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 51.8 mas, contrast 26cell (0,1): 43.7 mas, contrast 22cell (0,2): 39.4 mas, contrast 28cell (0,3): 34.9 mas, contrast 22cell (0,4): 45.6 mas, contrast 13cell (0,5): 43.1 mas, contrast 20cell (1,0): 44.4 mas, contrast 52cell (1,1): 44.9 mas, contrast 26cell (1,2): 55.6 mas, contrast 18cell (1,3): 49.2 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 40.9 mas, contrast 13cell (1,5): 41.0 mas, contrast 20cell (2,0): 50.4 mas, contrast 53cell (2,1): 47.6 mas, contrast 24cell (2,2): 49.0 mas, contrast 8cell (2,3): 160.8 mas, contrast 10cell (2,4): 46.8 mas, contrast 13cell (2,5): 36.2 mas, contrast 19cell (3,0): 50.2 mas, contrast 47cell (3,1): 43.3 mas, contrast 54cell (3,2): 47.3 mas, contrast 24cell (3,3): 5276.2 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 56.4 mas, contrast 7cell (3,5): 42.8 mas, contrast 20cell (4,0): 51.9 mas, contrast 61cell (4,1): 47.0 mas, contrast 57cell (4,2): 43.9 mas, contrast 36cell (4,3): 47.9 mas, contrast 16cell (4,4): 54.7 mas, contrast 8cell (4,5): 40.9 mas, contrast 15cell (5,0): 58.3 mas, contrast 39cell (5,1): 51.2 mas, contrast 41cell (5,2): 45.2 mas, contrast 20cell (5,3): 41.5 mas, contrast 12cell (5,4): 42.6 mas, contrast 14cell (5,5): 41.8 mas, contrast 13
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (3,3)5,276.22,688.4-4,539.96.024803
    (2,3)160.835.2-156.910.053816
    (5,0)58.3-57.2-11.039.050582
    (3,4)56.4-47.430.67.029213
    (1,2)55.6-52.3-19.017.5103890
    (4,4)54.7-41.5-35.68.057127
    (4,0)51.9-50.8-10.661.083861
    (0,0)51.8-51.27.825.5118418
    (5,1)51.2-50.6-7.441.047996
    (2,0)50.4-49.8-7.353.050766
    (3,0)50.2-48.9-11.247.049050
    (1,3)49.2-43.4-23.18.595168
    (2,2)49.0-43.921.98.592333
    (4,3)47.9-36.6-30.916.070022
    (2,1)47.6-46.111.724.5108780
    (3,2)47.3-44.316.724.065670
    (4,1)47.0-46.8-4.557.055599
    (2,4)46.8-37.4-28.113.0106830
    (0,4)45.6-41.5-18.813.0124064
    (5,2)45.2-43.0-14.120.037342
    (1,1)44.9-43.1-12.825.5135464
    (1,0)44.4-42.9-11.452.081909
    (4,2)43.9-43.8-3.636.040983
    (0,1)43.7-42.7-9.522.5146199
    (3,1)43.3-43.2-2.454.055450
    (0,5)43.1-40.913.520.5100264
    (3,5)42.8-41.012.219.5158187
    (5,4)42.6-39.9-14.814.0117201
    (5,5)41.8-34.1-24.113.0123059
    (5,3)41.5-38.8-14.612.093645
    (1,5)41.0-39.411.120.5158382
    (1,4)40.9-31.9-25.613.0155429
    (4,5)40.9-39.7-9.915.0133803
    (0,2)39.4-37.312.728.075042
    (2,5)36.2-34.4-11.219.0146201
    (0,3)34.9-32.3-13.222.085595
    Existing figures
  • warn
    F405N_o001 visit 1: worst tile 177.2 mas at cell (2,3) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_o001_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    29/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.65 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 21.3 mas, contrast 26cell (0,1): 22.7 mas, contrast 23cell (0,2): 19.0 mas, contrast 25cell (0,3): 27.2 mas, contrast 24cell (0,4): 26.1 mas, contrast 12cell (0,5): 20.0 mas, contrast 20cell (1,0): 15.4 mas, contrast 43cell (1,1): 16.3 mas, contrast 20cell (1,2): 16.3 mas, contrast 18cell (1,3): 29.8 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 40.2 mas, contrast 12cell (1,5): 17.8 mas, contrast 17cell (2,0): 13.3 mas, contrast 47cell (2,1): 22.7 mas, contrast 24cell (2,2): 30.5 mas, contrast 10cell (2,3): 177.2 mas, contrast 10cell (2,4): 29.1 mas, contrast 9cell (2,5): 19.1 mas, contrast 18cell (3,0): 7.7 mas, contrast 40cell (3,1): 9.8 mas, contrast 42cell (3,2): 18.5 mas, contrast 25cell (3,3): 31.9 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 97.5 mas, contrast 7cell (3,5): 21.8 mas, contrast 15cell (4,0): 14.1 mas, contrast 59cell (4,1): 8.2 mas, contrast 37cell (4,2): 4.2 mas, contrast 27cell (4,3): 31.6 mas, contrast 17cell (4,4): 43.2 mas, contrast 9cell (4,5): 25.7 mas, contrast 14cell (5,0): 19.0 mas, contrast 33cell (5,1): 8.5 mas, contrast 34cell (5,2): 16.4 mas, contrast 18cell (5,3): 20.9 mas, contrast 12cell (5,4): 17.3 mas, contrast 12cell (5,5): 33.9 mas, contrast 11
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (2,3)177.285.8-155.010.053805
    (3,4)97.594.4-24.37.029337
    (4,4)43.2-21.9-37.39.056813
    (1,4)40.231.3-25.211.5154963
    (5,5)33.928.2-18.911.0123841
    (3,3)31.9-27.6-16.16.024757
    (4,3)31.615.8-27.417.069599
    (2,2)30.521.122.09.591758
    (1,3)29.8-24.5-16.98.094319
    (2,4)29.1-6.3-28.59.0108372
    (0,3)27.225.4-9.524.083363
    (0,4)26.1-21.0-15.612.0122186
    (4,5)25.7-13.222.014.0135028
    (2,1)22.7-16.515.724.5108332
    (0,1)22.7-20.59.623.0145710
    (3,5)21.813.9-16.715.0158776
    (0,0)21.3-16.613.326.0118627
    (5,3)20.9-12.516.812.093554
    (0,5)20.010.017.320.097675
    (2,5)19.115.9-10.618.5147736
    (5,0)19.0-15.5-11.133.049980
    (0,2)19.0-8.916.725.074570
    (3,2)18.59.316.025.065021
    (1,5)17.813.3-11.817.0159314
    (5,4)17.312.3-12.212.0113947
    (5,2)16.410.8-12.418.036433
    (1,2)16.3-11.4-11.718.5104287
    (1,1)16.3-13.6-9.020.0135769
    (1,0)15.4-14.26.043.082214
    Existing figures
  • ok
    F212N: all 96 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_latest.json
  • ok
    F212N_o001: all 96 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    F405N: all 24 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_latest.json
  • ok
    F405N_o001: all 24 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F405N_o001_latest.json
  • ok
    m7 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    8 recent log(s), no error signatures
    logs/
  • ok
    m7: single tag 2026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty (12 products)
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • ok
    m8: single tag 2026-08-27_PR574_3bdf55f-dirty (3 products)
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
Generated 2026-09-19 14:56 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.