jwst-gc pipeline monitor

quintuplet · 2026-09-19 08:34 EDT
1 runs 0 failing 1 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

quintuplet 2045/o003 33d ago
4 warn
F212NF323N

Cutout runs

Every cutout run on disk: the shared monitor5as probes plus the hand-made experiment cutouts. A cutout run stops after m6 — m7 and m8 need more than one filter — so "catalogs" here counts per-filter products only. These rows also flag zero-byte products and orphan tmp* files: a write that died mid-flight leaves both, and a count-based ladder reads them as finished work.

fieldlabelframescatalogs filterstouchedflags
quintupletmonitor5as 1221 F212N:12 48d ago

Detail

quintuplet · 2045/o003

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/quintuplet back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F212N9696·9660133333destreak
F323N2424·2460133333destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 2045/o003.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F212N 1 96 0 0 334 1.02 same-star 36/36 20.7 (1,2) 2026-08-01T06:46:43Z
F212N_o003 1 96 0 0 336 1.04 same-star 36/36 20.7 (1,2) 2026-08-15T11:47:46Z
F323N 1 24 0 0 886 0.17 same-star 36/36 20.1 (0,2) 2026-08-01T07:18:31Z
F323N_o003 1 24 0 0 850 0.14 same-star 36/36 20.1 (0,2) 2026-08-15T12:59:15Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

phaseproductspipeline tag(s)
m792026-08-12_PR375_f7059e5 (9)
m832026-08-12_PR375_f7059e5 (3)

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • warn
    F212N visit 1: worst tile 20.7 mas at cell (1,2) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    9/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 1.02 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 11.7 mas, contrast 23cell (0,1): 13.8 mas, contrast 24cell (0,2): 13.7 mas, contrast 17cell (0,3): 11.9 mas, contrast 20cell (0,4): 8.4 mas, contrast 26cell (0,5): 13.8 mas, contrast 32cell (1,0): 11.2 mas, contrast 33cell (1,1): 6.4 mas, contrast 21cell (1,2): 20.7 mas, contrast 24cell (1,3): 11.9 mas, contrast 21cell (1,4): 15.1 mas, contrast 21cell (1,5): 18.2 mas, contrast 30cell (2,0): 9.0 mas, contrast 21cell (2,1): 13.0 mas, contrast 24cell (2,2): 14.9 mas, contrast 22cell (2,3): 10.4 mas, contrast 24cell (2,4): 8.1 mas, contrast 19cell (2,5): 6.1 mas, contrast 22cell (3,0): 11.5 mas, contrast 20cell (3,1): 12.1 mas, contrast 24cell (3,2): 12.6 mas, contrast 16cell (3,3): 13.2 mas, contrast 20cell (3,4): 9.3 mas, contrast 26cell (3,5): 11.6 mas, contrast 28cell (4,0): 11.2 mas, contrast 30cell (4,1): 17.1 mas, contrast 25cell (4,2): 17.9 mas, contrast 16cell (4,3): 17.8 mas, contrast 23cell (4,4): 12.7 mas, contrast 21cell (4,5): 16.3 mas, contrast 30cell (5,0): 10.2 mas, contrast 26cell (5,1): 12.1 mas, contrast 36cell (5,2): 9.6 mas, contrast 38cell (5,3): 19.5 mas, contrast 38cell (5,4): 14.1 mas, contrast 27cell (5,5): 16.0 mas, contrast 20
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,2)20.719.27.823.5144419
    (5,3)19.5-15.7-11.638.068785
    (1,5)18.211.0-14.530.0172577
    (4,2)17.9-6.4-16.716.5100028
    (4,3)17.8-14.1-10.823.0109807
    (4,1)17.1-5.6-16.125.0205198
    (4,5)16.3-14.8-7.030.5156203
    (5,5)16.0-15.05.520.590403
    (1,4)15.110.4-10.921.0232512
  • warn
    F212N_o003 visit 1: worst tile 20.7 mas at cell (1,2) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_o003_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    9/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 1.04 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 11.7 mas, contrast 23cell (0,1): 13.8 mas, contrast 24cell (0,2): 13.7 mas, contrast 17cell (0,3): 11.9 mas, contrast 20cell (0,4): 8.4 mas, contrast 26cell (0,5): 13.8 mas, contrast 32cell (1,0): 11.2 mas, contrast 33cell (1,1): 6.4 mas, contrast 21cell (1,2): 20.7 mas, contrast 24cell (1,3): 11.9 mas, contrast 21cell (1,4): 15.1 mas, contrast 21cell (1,5): 18.3 mas, contrast 30cell (2,0): 9.0 mas, contrast 21cell (2,1): 13.0 mas, contrast 24cell (2,2): 14.9 mas, contrast 22cell (2,3): 11.5 mas, contrast 24cell (2,4): 8.7 mas, contrast 20cell (2,5): 6.1 mas, contrast 22cell (3,0): 11.7 mas, contrast 19cell (3,1): 12.1 mas, contrast 24cell (3,2): 12.6 mas, contrast 16cell (3,3): 13.2 mas, contrast 20cell (3,4): 9.9 mas, contrast 26cell (3,5): 11.5 mas, contrast 28cell (4,0): 11.2 mas, contrast 30cell (4,1): 17.1 mas, contrast 25cell (4,2): 17.9 mas, contrast 16cell (4,3): 17.8 mas, contrast 23cell (4,4): 12.7 mas, contrast 21cell (4,5): 16.3 mas, contrast 30cell (5,0): 10.2 mas, contrast 26cell (5,1): 12.1 mas, contrast 36cell (5,2): 9.6 mas, contrast 38cell (5,3): 19.5 mas, contrast 38cell (5,4): 14.1 mas, contrast 27cell (5,5): 15.9 mas, contrast 20
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,2)20.719.27.823.5144419
    (5,3)19.5-15.7-11.638.068898
    (1,5)18.311.1-14.630.0172578
    (4,2)17.9-6.4-16.716.5100028
    (4,3)17.8-14.1-10.823.0109807
    (4,1)17.1-5.7-16.125.0205198
    (4,5)16.3-14.7-7.030.5156108
    (5,5)15.9-15.05.420.590403
    (1,4)15.110.4-10.921.0232412
  • warn
    F323N visit 1: worst tile 20.1 mas at cell (0,2) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F323N_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    8/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.17 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 11.6 mas, contrast 41cell (0,1): 11.9 mas, contrast 50cell (0,2): 20.1 mas, contrast 29cell (0,3): 12.1 mas, contrast 35cell (0,4): 12.3 mas, contrast 59cell (0,5): 10.9 mas, contrast 56cell (1,0): 13.1 mas, contrast 60cell (1,1): 14.3 mas, contrast 67cell (1,2): 18.5 mas, contrast 45cell (1,3): 15.7 mas, contrast 40cell (1,4): 14.2 mas, contrast 29cell (1,5): 14.9 mas, contrast 56cell (2,0): 11.4 mas, contrast 56cell (2,1): 10.9 mas, contrast 64cell (2,2): 14.6 mas, contrast 42cell (2,3): 11.9 mas, contrast 46cell (2,4): 11.2 mas, contrast 54cell (2,5): 15.8 mas, contrast 53cell (3,0): 12.1 mas, contrast 59cell (3,1): 10.4 mas, contrast 64cell (3,2): 12.1 mas, contrast 31cell (3,3): 10.1 mas, contrast 31cell (3,4): 13.5 mas, contrast 53cell (3,5): 15.6 mas, contrast 52cell (4,0): 11.3 mas, contrast 56cell (4,1): 12.2 mas, contrast 61cell (4,2): 15.9 mas, contrast 28cell (4,3): 16.4 mas, contrast 40cell (4,4): 12.9 mas, contrast 55cell (4,5): 13.4 mas, contrast 54cell (5,0): 8.6 mas, contrast 52cell (5,1): 14.2 mas, contrast 65cell (5,2): 17.1 mas, contrast 30cell (5,3): 12.4 mas, contrast 34cell (5,4): 12.8 mas, contrast 44cell (5,5): 10.8 mas, contrast 31
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,2)20.1-4.519.629.034691
    (1,2)18.513.512.745.043720
    (5,2)17.110.9-13.230.031250
    (4,3)16.4-13.4-9.440.041812
    (4,2)15.99.7-12.628.030765
    (2,5)15.812.3-10.053.075141
    (1,3)15.7-10.8-11.540.061210
    (3,5)15.6-11.310.852.068587
  • warn
    F323N_o003 visit 1: worst tile 20.1 mas at cell (0,2) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F323N_o003_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    8/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.14 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 11.8 mas, contrast 41cell (0,1): 11.9 mas, contrast 51cell (0,2): 20.1 mas, contrast 29cell (0,3): 12.7 mas, contrast 35cell (0,4): 12.4 mas, contrast 60cell (0,5): 11.0 mas, contrast 57cell (1,0): 13.1 mas, contrast 60cell (1,1): 14.4 mas, contrast 66cell (1,2): 18.3 mas, contrast 45cell (1,3): 15.6 mas, contrast 40cell (1,4): 15.6 mas, contrast 30cell (1,5): 14.9 mas, contrast 58cell (2,0): 11.4 mas, contrast 56cell (2,1): 11.4 mas, contrast 64cell (2,2): 14.7 mas, contrast 41cell (2,3): 12.0 mas, contrast 45cell (2,4): 11.4 mas, contrast 53cell (2,5): 16.3 mas, contrast 53cell (3,0): 12.4 mas, contrast 58cell (3,1): 10.4 mas, contrast 63cell (3,2): 12.5 mas, contrast 31cell (3,3): 11.2 mas, contrast 32cell (3,4): 13.4 mas, contrast 51cell (3,5): 14.5 mas, contrast 53cell (4,0): 10.7 mas, contrast 55cell (4,1): 12.1 mas, contrast 60cell (4,2): 15.6 mas, contrast 29cell (4,3): 15.6 mas, contrast 41cell (4,4): 13.6 mas, contrast 54cell (4,5): 14.1 mas, contrast 53cell (5,0): 8.5 mas, contrast 52cell (5,1): 14.4 mas, contrast 67cell (5,2): 17.1 mas, contrast 30cell (5,3): 12.4 mas, contrast 34cell (5,4): 12.1 mas, contrast 46cell (5,5): 12.8 mas, contrast 33
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    Diagnostic writeupD3 — absolute tie to the reference frame · full diagnostic writeup (PDF)
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,2)20.1-4.519.629.034699
    (1,2)18.314.910.645.043629
    (5,2)17.110.9-13.230.031516
    (2,5)16.313.0-9.853.075139
    (4,2)15.69.7-12.229.030931
    (1,3)15.6-10.6-11.540.061189
    (1,4)15.612.2-9.729.593026
    (4,3)15.6-12.3-9.541.041711
  • ok
    F212N: all 96 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_latest.json
  • ok
    F212N_o003: all 96 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F212N_o003_latest.json
  • ok
    F323N: all 24 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F323N_latest.json
  • ok
    F323N_o003: all 24 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F323N_o003_latest.json
  • ok
    m7 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m7: single tag 2026-08-12_PR375_f7059e5 (9 products)
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • ok
    m8: single tag 2026-08-12_PR375_f7059e5 (3 products)
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
Generated 2026-09-19 08:34 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.