jwst-gc pipeline monitor

gc2211_o050 · 2026-09-19 02:35 EDT
1 runs 1 failing 0 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

gc2211_o050 2211/o050 27d ago
4 fail7 warn
F200WF277W

Detail

gc2211_o050 · 2211/o050

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/gc2211_o050 back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F200W4848·4820111111destreak
F277W1212·1220111111destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 2211/o050.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F200W_o050 1 48 13 0 176 47.32 histogram 28/36 9520.0 (5,0) 2026-08-22T13:12:15Z
F277W_o050 1 12 0 0 779 894.87 histogram 29/36 29272.6 (5,5) 2026-08-22T14:01:49Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

phaseproductspipeline tag(s)
m732026-08-22_PR494_463a63f-dirty (3)
m812026-08-22_PR494_463a63f-dirty (1)

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • fail
    F200W_o050: 13/48 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o050_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 4/4 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrcb1 visit 1: dRA -0.5, dDec 2.0 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 1.1, dDec -1.7 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 1.8, dDec -2.2 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 1.6, dDec -2.1 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -0.5, dDec 2.1 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 1.8, dDec -1.7 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 1.7, dDec -1.7 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -0.3, dDec 2.2 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 1.7, dDec -1.8 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 1.6, dDec -1.7 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -0.5, dDec 2.2 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 1.6, dDec -1.6 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 1.5, dDec -1.6 masnrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±2 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrcb14/12
    nrcb23/12
    nrcb33/12
    nrcb43/12
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrcb1-0.52.02.0469.813518273.0
    1nrcb11.1-1.72.0562.713509883.0
    1nrcb11.8-2.22.8576.713527133.0
    1nrcb11.6-2.12.7575.513526293.0
    1nrcb2-0.52.12.2411.912273673.0
    1nrcb21.8-1.72.5631.512181573.0
    1nrcb21.7-1.72.4632.712196943.0
    1nrcb3-0.32.22.2422.414085903.0
    1nrcb31.7-1.82.5582.813908923.0
    1nrcb31.6-1.72.3587.914034003.0
    1nrcb4-0.52.22.2535.712730803.0
    1nrcb41.6-1.62.3604.112664393.0
    1nrcb41.5-1.62.2608.212752423.0
  • fail
    F200W_o050 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o050_latest.json
  • fail
    F277W_o050 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o050_latest.json
  • fail
    errors in gc2211_o0502211-o050-m7-finalize: missing-input, traceback
    Traceback (most recent call last): FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/gc2211_o050//reduction/fwhm_table.ecsv'
    catalog_gc2211_o0502211-o050-m7-finalize_39905426_4294967294.out
  • warn
    m7: 3 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • warn
    m8: 1 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
  • warn
    2 different CRDS contexts among the sampled frames: jwst_1550.pmap, jwst_1553.pmap
    Frames calibrated against different CRDS contexts do not share one WCS solution — distortion and filteroffset references differ between them. A catalog built from the mixture carries whichever each frame got. (Sampled, so this is a lower bound on the spread.)
    FITS header CRDS_CTX
    what is affected, and why
    Frames from different reduction epochs are co-resident in the filter directory. Distortion and filteroffset references differ between contexts, so positions from the two generations do not share one solution — and an apparent inter-module or inter-visit offset can be entirely this. Re-reduce the older frames, or move them out of the globbed directory.
    filterCRDS_CTXframes sampled
    F200Wjwst_1550.pmap4
    F277Wjwst_1553.pmap4
  • warn
    F200W_o050 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o050_latest.json
  • warn
    F277W_o050 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o050_latest.json
  • warn
    F200W_o050 visit 1: worst tile 9520.0 mas at cell (5,0) (> 15 mas)
    28/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o050_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 47.32 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 5129.0 mas, contrast 7cell (0,1): 1324.6 mas, contrast 5cell (0,2): 6629.0 mas, contrast 5cell (0,3): 8473.4 mas, contrast 6cell (0,4): 8001.5 mas, contrast 4cell (0,5): 8893.9 mas, contrast 7cell (1,0): 8439.7 mas, contrast 6cell (1,1): 1096.5 mas, contrast 6cell (1,2): 1185.2 mas, contrast 5cell (1,3): 2394.6 mas, contrast 5cell (1,4): 2898.7 mas, contrast 5cell (1,5): 1319.7 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 8956.5 mas, contrast 4cell (2,1): 2531.9 mas, contrast 4cell (2,2): 2305.1 mas, contrast 5cell (2,3): 2288.6 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 363.4 mas, contrast 5cell (2,5): 1249.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,0): 2202.6 mas, contrast 4cell (3,1): 2315.1 mas, contrast 5cell (3,2): 2410.2 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 2905.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,4): 1186.0 mas, contrast 5cell (3,5): 1598.4 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 2788.7 mas, contrast 4cell (4,1): 2797.8 mas, contrast 5cell (4,2): 1268.2 mas, contrast 5cell (4,3): 1965.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 2064.7 mas, contrast 5cell (4,5): 3597.0 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 9520.0 mas, contrast 9cell (5,1): 6407.9 mas, contrast 4cell (5,2): 8435.9 mas, contrast 4cell (5,3): 1852.7 mas, contrast 5cell (5,4): 2820.1 mas, contrast 5cell (5,5): 3825.5 mas, contrast 9
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,0)9,520.07,827.05,419.19.047642
    (2,0)8,956.5-2,969.48,450.04.5125771
    (0,5)8,893.9-5,696.16,830.57.066127
    (0,3)8,473.4-902.58,425.25.5121811
    (1,0)8,439.7-7,766.1-3,304.05.5109935
    (5,2)8,435.9-8,432.6-236.04.5116366
    (0,4)8,001.5-3,897.4-6,988.14.5120510
    (0,2)6,629.0-5,108.8-4,224.14.7208025
    (5,1)6,407.9-5,903.2-2,492.64.599050
    (0,0)5,129.01,703.2-4,837.97.052640
    (5,5)3,825.5895.13,719.39.072012
    (4,5)3,597.02,642.12,440.75.5130421
    (3,3)2,905.6-2,876.3411.85.023038
    (1,4)2,898.7-2,789.2789.45.025164
    (5,4)2,820.1-2,397.91,484.35.020185
    (4,1)2,797.8-2,391.3-1,452.45.026638
    (4,0)2,788.7-2,670.0805.24.017831
    (2,1)2,531.9-2,031.51,511.14.023951
    (3,2)2,410.21,565.01,833.05.021232
    (1,3)2,394.6-2,330.5-550.05.019637
    (3,1)2,315.1-1,471.31,787.55.025027
    (2,2)2,305.12,186.1731.25.023112
    (2,3)2,288.6-2,110.0886.45.019061
    (3,0)2,202.6-1,773.0-1,306.84.017333
    (4,4)2,064.7-730.71,931.15.023981
    (4,3)1,965.91,549.0-1,210.55.025819
    (5,3)1,852.71,655.3832.25.017858
    (3,5)1,598.4-451.2-1,533.45.013578
    (0,1)1,324.6-1,187.4587.25.025503
    (1,5)1,319.7-1,294.8255.05.025464
    (4,2)1,268.2-249.2-1,243.55.023209
    (2,5)1,249.6-1,212.0-304.45.020830
    (3,4)1,186.01,145.5307.55.020041
    (1,2)1,185.2-1,131.0-354.35.027349
    (1,1)1,096.5711.6-834.26.026018
    (2,4)363.4353.6-83.85.026418
  • warn
    F277W_o050 visit 1: worst tile 29272.6 mas at cell (5,5) (> 15 mas)
    29/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o050_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 894.87 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 19328.1 mas, contrast 7cell (0,1): 8196.6 mas, contrast 5cell (0,2): 21521.9 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 16429.6 mas, contrast 4cell (0,4): 6908.7 mas, contrast 4cell (0,5): 21896.9 mas, contrast 7cell (1,0): 12980.7 mas, contrast 8cell (1,1): 2952.5 mas, contrast 5cell (1,2): 7833.4 mas, contrast 4cell (1,3): 25067.0 mas, contrast 4cell (1,4): 6412.7 mas, contrast 5cell (1,5): 8822.6 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 25279.3 mas, contrast 9cell (2,1): 7045.8 mas, contrast 4cell (2,2): 26990.3 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 6191.7 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 4366.9 mas, contrast 5cell (2,5): 28054.7 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 19540.0 mas, contrast 6cell (3,1): 6871.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,2): 21417.2 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 5809.9 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 7291.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,5): 6623.5 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 20354.3 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 25621.0 mas, contrast 5cell (4,2): 7889.0 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 7833.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 8623.2 mas, contrast 4cell (4,5): 25989.4 mas, contrast 8cell (5,0): 28550.2 mas, contrast 6cell (5,1): 26057.2 mas, contrast 9cell (5,2): 18306.5 mas, contrast 4cell (5,3): 15966.1 mas, contrast 6cell (5,4): 28749.4 mas, contrast 6cell (5,5): 29272.6 mas, contrast 6
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,5)29,272.6-20,898.820,497.06.046344
    (5,4)28,749.4-19,082.721,503.05.5169671
    (5,0)28,550.2-27,715.6-6,852.66.057818
    (2,5)28,054.7-27,900.9-2,932.95.5167595
    (2,2)26,990.3-8,843.8-25,500.35.5174626
    (5,1)26,057.2-3,905.325,762.99.088271
    (4,5)25,989.4-22,098.313,678.98.089226
    (4,1)25,621.0-25,435.23,079.35.0163071
    (2,0)25,279.34,506.424,874.49.087397
    (1,3)25,067.0-4,305.6-24,694.44.3194387
    (0,5)21,896.9-12,318.918,102.97.072529
    (0,2)21,521.919,685.78,698.76.0157668
    (3,2)21,417.2-6,869.3-20,285.75.0142017
    (4,0)20,354.3-5,944.3-19,467.06.0149163
    (3,0)19,540.0-13,318.6-14,297.85.5141643
    (0,0)19,328.1-19,050.1-3,266.67.047937
    (5,2)18,306.5-16,124.9-8,667.04.5110214
    (0,3)16,429.6-14,742.2-7,252.54.5107882
    (5,3)15,966.115,894.81,507.16.0152718
    (1,0)12,980.7-12,915.7-1,298.28.077182
    (1,5)8,822.6-1,822.3-8,632.35.021263
    (4,4)8,623.2-8,024.5-3,156.94.021191
    (0,1)8,196.6-1,608.98,037.25.020900
    (4,2)7,889.0-7,062.0-3,516.45.5169226
    (1,2)7,833.4-7,833.3-33.34.025446
    (4,3)7,833.3-7,659.7-1,639.75.020530
    (3,4)7,291.6-5,887.6-4,301.75.021651
    (2,1)7,045.8-7,007.8-730.84.021056
    (0,4)6,908.7-6,908.283.44.011884
    (3,1)6,871.6-900.7-6,812.35.019916
    (3,5)6,623.52,102.56,280.95.015391
    (1,4)6,412.7-6,308.6-1,151.15.019578
    (2,3)6,191.75,355.33,107.85.019476
    (3,3)5,809.95,326.82,319.56.5156585
    (2,4)4,366.9749.8-4,302.15.023154
    (1,1)2,952.5-1,480.4-2,554.65.018394
  • ok
    F277W_o050: all 12 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o050_latest.json
  • ok
    m7 present (2 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 cross-band product absent
    catalogs/basic_*_photometry_tables_merged_*.fits
  • ok
    m7: single tag 2026-08-22_PR494_463a63f-dirty (3 products)
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • ok
    m8: single tag 2026-08-22_PR494_463a63f-dirty (1 products)
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
Generated 2026-09-19 02:35 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.