jwst-gc pipeline monitor

gc2211_o023 · 2026-09-19 04:32 EDT
1 runs 1 failing 0 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

gc2211_o023 2211/o023 27d ago
3 fail3 warn
F200WF277W

Detail

gc2211_o023 · 2211/o023

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/gc2211_o023 back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F200W3232·32311····destreak
F277W88·83······destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 2211/o023.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F200W_o023 1 32 32 0 50 111.27 histogram 35/36 9176.9 (5,3) 2026-08-22T11:32:28Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

No *.prov.json sidecars.

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • fail
    F200W_o023: 32/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o023_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrca1 visit 1: dRA 92.6, dDec -12.3 masnrca1 visit 1: dRA -157.1, dDec 3.7 masnrca1 visit 1: dRA -157.6, dDec 6.9 masnrca1 visit 1: dRA 49.7, dDec 9.8 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA 106.4, dDec 7.8 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA -205.9, dDec -12.0 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA -205.4, dDec -11.1 masnrca2 visit 1: dRA -52.1, dDec -9.3 masnrca3 visit 1: dRA 150.0, dDec -51.7 masnrca3 visit 1: dRA -9.5, dDec -9.6 masnrca3 visit 1: dRA -8.1, dDec -6.5 masnrca3 visit 1: dRA 129.6, dDec 49.6 masnrca4 visit 1: dRA 151.2, dDec -50.0 masnrca4 visit 1: dRA -8.6, dDec -8.3 masnrca4 visit 1: dRA -7.9, dDec -5.2 masnrca4 visit 1: dRA 127.5, dDec 73.3 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 190.5, dDec 8.7 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -7.9, dDec -6.2 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -7.8, dDec -5.4 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA 146.1, dDec 9.4 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 150.9, dDec -33.5 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -8.6, dDec -8.9 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA -9.5, dDec -6.1 masnrcb2 visit 1: dRA 129.7, dDec 9.1 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 71.0, dDec -30.3 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -176.1, dDec 6.5 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA -175.4, dDec 9.4 masnrcb3 visit 1: dRA 62.9, dDec 10.2 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 145.6, dDec -48.8 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -8.8, dDec -9.0 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA -8.8, dDec -4.6 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 143.9, dDec 90.5 masnrca1 nrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±206 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrca14/4
    nrca24/4
    nrca34/4
    nrca44/4
    nrcb14/4
    nrcb24/4
    nrcb34/4
    nrcb44/4
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrca192.6-12.393.463.51206873.0
    1nrca1-157.13.7157.2190.51760883.0
    1nrca1-157.66.9157.7123.72143723.0
    1nrca149.79.850.753.0976993.0
    1nrca2106.47.8106.7106.51220943.0
    1nrca2-205.9-12.0206.3348.5977503.0
    1nrca2-205.4-11.1205.7337.01407543.0
    1nrca2-52.1-9.353.0104.0698013.0
    1nrca3150.0-51.7158.693.51448023.0
    1nrca3-9.5-9.613.5261.72134083.0
    1nrca3-8.1-6.510.3221.02572693.0
    1nrca3129.649.6138.889.01067043.0
    1nrca4151.2-50.0159.299.51660253.0
    1nrca4-8.6-8.312.0296.72513383.0
    1nrca4-7.9-5.29.4186.52871813.0
    1nrca4127.573.3147.170.01218623.0
    1nrcb1190.58.7190.7119.01553733.0
    1nrcb1-7.9-6.210.0409.51513133.0
    1nrcb1-7.8-5.49.5292.32177983.0
    1nrcb1146.19.4146.4134.0881603.0
    1nrcb2150.9-33.5154.691.01118433.0
    1nrcb2-8.6-8.912.4352.51430583.0
    1nrcb2-9.5-6.111.3224.31873283.0
    1nrcb2129.79.1130.0109.0652323.0
    1nrcb371.0-30.377.267.51206283.0
    1nrcb3-176.16.5176.2292.51515583.0
    1nrcb3-175.49.4175.7217.71948213.0
    1nrcb362.910.263.750.0787143.0
    1nrcb4145.6-48.8153.5106.51355863.0
    1nrcb4-8.8-9.012.6270.01868983.0
    1nrcb4-8.8-4.610.0235.32373033.0
    1nrcb4143.990.5170.0127.0884053.0
  • fail
    F200W_o023 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.50 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o023_latest.json
  • fail
    errors in gc2211_o0232211-o023-m12-finalize: offsets-table, traceback
    Traceback (most recent call last): raise OffsetsTableUpdateError( jwst_gc_pipeline.photometry.astrometry_checkpoint.OffsetsTableUpdateError: cannot pool corrections for Offsets_JWST_Brick2211_VIRAC2locked.csv: 4 corrections for modules ['nrca1', 'nrca2', 'nrca3', 'nrca4'] disagree -- they are 73.7 mas apart at their furthest (limit 50.0 mas, ASTROM_MAX_POOL_SPREAD
    catalog_gc2211_o0232211-o023-m12-finalize_39951648_4294967294.out
  • warn
    F200W_o023 visit 1: consensus scatter 37.4 mas
    Above 20 mas (10x the 2.0 mas per-exposure tolerance). This is a monitor heuristic, not a pipeline gate.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o023_latest.json
  • warn
    F200W_o023 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o023_latest.json
  • warn
    F200W_o023 visit 1: worst tile 9176.9 mas at cell (5,3) (> 15 mas)
    35/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F200W_o023_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 111.27 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 50.7 mas, contrast 6cell (0,1): 155.0 mas, contrast 12cell (0,2): 110.1 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 161.9 mas, contrast 14cell (0,4): 102.5 mas, contrast 8cell (0,5): 113.3 mas, contrast 19cell (1,0): 100.4 mas, contrast 8cell (1,1): 51.8 mas, contrast 8cell (1,2): 151.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 153.8 mas, contrast 9cell (1,4): 108.0 mas, contrast 12cell (1,5): 109.1 mas, contrast 16cell (2,0): 197.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,1): 147.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,2): 139.9 mas, contrast 10cell (2,3): 119.8 mas, contrast 13cell (2,4): 167.3 mas, contrast 10cell (2,5): 117.5 mas, contrast 8cell (3,0): 53.2 mas, contrast 10cell (3,1): 124.6 mas, contrast 6cell (3,2): 116.7 mas, contrast 9cell (3,3): 50.8 mas, contrast 8cell (3,4): 146.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,5): 108.2 mas, contrast 12cell (4,0): 88.1 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 101.3 mas, contrast 8cell (4,2): 167.1 mas, contrast 4cell (4,3): 33.8 mas, contrast 13cell (4,4): 120.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,5): 107.6 mas, contrast 14cell (5,0): 85.6 mas, contrast 5cell (5,1): 86.5 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 114.8 mas, contrast 5cell (5,3): 9176.9 mas, contrast 6cell (5,4): 48.7 mas, contrast 7cell (5,5): 104.6 mas, contrast 16
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,3)9,176.9-7,571.75,185.06.041323
    (2,0)197.2-168.5102.45.5129468
    (2,4)167.3-165.6-23.910.5123537
    (4,2)167.1-166.118.14.5104507
    (0,3)161.9-160.4-22.114.064290
    (0,1)155.0-154.1-16.012.0160266
    (1,3)153.8-153.72.99.055630
    (1,2)151.4-148.728.56.589707
    (2,1)147.2-145.3-23.76.0113875
    (3,4)146.6-145.319.25.0122195
    (2,2)139.9-107.689.310.072537
    (3,1)124.6-120.731.25.5118217
    (4,4)120.5-119.9-12.06.0156995
    (2,3)119.8-119.4-10.313.062567
    (2,5)117.5-115.919.28.5105878
    (3,2)116.7-108.2-43.79.077779
    (5,2)114.8-111.5-27.25.093704
    (0,5)113.3-107.037.419.071374
    (0,2)110.1-106.926.26.589851
    (1,5)109.1-104.631.116.0110013
    (3,5)108.2-105.026.411.5118775
    (1,4)108.0-107.5-9.811.5133314
    (4,5)107.6-105.720.114.0141348
    (5,5)104.6-101.126.915.5124985
    (0,4)102.5-97.232.78.088945
    (4,1)101.3-97.327.98.0167197
    (1,0)100.4-95.929.67.5161910
    (4,0)88.187.1-13.45.5103561
    (5,1)86.5-81.6-28.76.5156596
    (5,0)85.683.021.15.094866
    (3,0)53.239.335.910.5125844
    (1,1)51.8-48.119.48.5160405
    (3,3)50.835.536.38.056461
    (0,0)50.736.934.86.5158077
    (5,4)48.7-37.231.47.0137552
    (4,3)33.8-16.7-29.413.072452
  • ok
    m7 present (1 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 cross-band product absent
    catalogs/basic_*_photometry_tables_merged_*.fits
Generated 2026-09-19 04:32 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.