jwst-gc pipeline monitor

Stage ladder

Products per filter

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 9438/o005.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

No *.prov.json sidecars.

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

• fail
  F090W_o005: 6/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F090W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 6/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrca11/4

  nrca41/4

  nrcb11/4

  nrcb21/4

  nrcb31/4

  nrcb41/4

  nrca20/4

  nrca30/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrca1	-1.5	1.8	2.3	108.0	3101	10.0
  1	nrca4	-2.3	3.0	3.8	136.0	4789	10.0
  1	nrcb1	-1.5	2.5	2.9	406.0	48412	10.0
  1	nrcb2	-2.0	2.3	3.0	424.0	72384	10.0
  1	nrcb3	-1.9	2.3	3.0	212.0	16877	10.0
  1	nrcb4	-1.4	2.2	2.7	393.0	37728	10.0

• fail
  F115W_o005: 8/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F115W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrca11/4

  nrca21/4

  nrca31/4

  nrca41/4

  nrcb11/4

  nrcb21/4

  nrcb31/4

  nrcb41/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrca1	-1.7	2.1	2.7	372.0	22368	10.0
  1	nrca2	-1.4	1.6	2.1	677.0	9745	3.0
  1	nrca3	-1.3	1.7	2.2	816.0	11380	3.0
  1	nrca4	-1.9	2.2	2.9	686.0	9874	3.0
  1	nrcb1	-1.6	2.1	2.6	2,185.0	89748	3.0
  1	nrcb2	-1.5	1.8	2.4	1,370.0	136744	3.0
  1	nrcb3	-1.5	1.9	2.4	1,143.0	26530	3.0
  1	nrcb4	-1.5	1.8	2.3	1,255.0	93674	3.0

• fail
  F140M_o005: 7/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F140M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 7/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrca11/4

  nrca21/4

  nrca41/4

  nrcb11/4

  nrcb21/4

  nrcb31/4

  nrcb41/4

  nrca30/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrca1	-1.3	1.9	2.3	1,010.0	16083	3.0
  1	nrca2	-1.1	1.8	2.1	1,963.0	53100	3.0
  1	nrca4	-1.7	2.2	2.7	1,632.0	43656	3.0
  1	nrcb1	-1.5	2.0	2.5	1,467.0	241645	3.0
  1	nrcb2	-1.3	1.7	2.1	1,115.4	356352	3.0
  1	nrcb3	-1.3	1.9	2.3	1,511.5	113116	3.0
  1	nrcb4	-1.3	1.8	2.2	1,319.8	286308	3.0

• fail
  F150W_o005: 8/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F150W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrca11/4

  nrca21/4

  nrca31/4

  nrca41/4

  nrcb11/4

  nrcb21/4

  nrcb31/4

  nrcb41/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrca1	-1.5	2.0	2.5	2,138.0	67093	3.0
  1	nrca2	-1.2	1.8	2.2	1,311.0	186149	3.0
  1	nrca3	-1.2	1.7	2.1	1,470.0	206151	3.0
  1	nrca4	-1.7	2.2	2.8	1,526.0	127560	3.0
  1	nrcb1	-1.6	2.1	2.6	970.9	524064	3.0
  1	nrcb2	-1.3	1.9	2.3	832.6	721078	3.0
  1	nrcb3	-1.4	2.0	2.4	1,291.8	298307	3.0
  1	nrcb4	-1.4	1.9	2.4	901.2	623254	3.0

• fail
  F182M_o005: 9/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F182M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcb32/4

  nrca11/4

  nrca21/4

  nrca31/4

  nrca41/4

  nrcb11/4

  nrcb21/4

  nrcb41/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrca1	-1.7	2.2	2.8	1,405.7	211922	3.0
  1	nrca2	-1.8	2.4	3.0	1,063.7	420080	3.0
  1	nrca3	1.6	-1.6	2.3	1,036.0	502922	3.0
  1	nrca4	-1.7	2.4	3.0	1,253.2	282253	3.0
  1	nrcb1	-1.8	2.4	3.0	793.4	770521	3.0
  1	nrcb2	-1.7	2.1	2.7	765.8	964042	3.0
  1	nrcb3	2.1	-1.7	2.7	1,050.9	551272	3.0
  1	nrcb3	0.7	-2.2	2.3	863.0	573363	3.0
  1	nrcb4	-1.7	2.2	2.8	789.5	925277	3.0

• fail
  F210M_o005: 8/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 8/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrca11/4

  nrca21/4

  nrca31/4

  nrca41/4

  nrcb11/4

  nrcb21/4

  nrcb31/4

  nrcb41/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrca1	-1.4	2.0	2.4	1,368.0	330828	3.0
  1	nrca2	-1.5	2.2	2.6	1,035.3	539951	3.0
  1	nrca3	-1.4	2.1	2.6	991.5	615940	3.0
  1	nrca4	-1.4	2.2	2.6	1,178.4	380446	3.0
  1	nrcb1	-1.4	2.1	2.5	766.5	868341	3.0
  1	nrcb2	-1.2	1.9	2.2	732.3	1022313	3.0
  1	nrcb3	-1.3	2.0	2.4	840.4	700837	3.0
  1	nrcb4	-1.3	2.1	2.5	745.4	1002431	3.0

• fail
  F277W_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F277W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.2	1.9	2.3	2,461.7	243324	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.3	2.2	2.5	2,097.2	289908	3.0

• fail
  F300M_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F300M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.2	1.9	2.3	2,655.3	222199	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.4	2.0	2.5	2,580.0	320735	3.0

• fail
  F335M_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F335M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.3	1.9	2.3	2,594.7	189846	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.2	1.8	2.1	2,584.2	303570	3.0

• fail
  F360M_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F360M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.2	1.8	2.2	3,020.3	237471	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.4	1.9	2.4	2,781.8	315033	3.0

• fail
  F410M_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F410M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.2	1.6	2.0	3,192.3	265086	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.2	1.9	2.3	2,845.8	327248	3.0

• fail
  F430M_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F430M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.2	1.8	2.1	2,954.7	232225	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.5	2.0	2.5	2,787.0	311777	3.0

• fail
  F480M_o005: 2/8 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus

  An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.

  checkpoint_m2_F480M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.

  Misaligned by detector

  nrcalong1/4

  nrcblong1/4

  visit	detector	dRA (mas)	dDec (mas)	off (mas)	contrast	pairs	window ("")
  1	nrcalong	-1.1	1.8	2.1	2,653.3	213704	3.0
  1	nrcblong	-1.3	2.1	2.5	2,613.2	291377	3.0

• fail
  F150W_o005 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5

  At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.

  checkpoint_m2_F150W_o005_latest.json
• fail
  F210M_o005 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5

  At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.

  checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json
• fail
  F277W_o005 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.67 < 5

  At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.

  checkpoint_m2_F277W_o005_latest.json
• fail
  errors in g0079438-o005-m4-fanout (6 tasks): walltime

  [2026-09-13T21:24:57.008] error: *** JOB 41934900 ON c0706a-s2 CANCELLED AT 2026-09-13T21:24:57 DUE TO TIME LIMIT ***

  catalog_g0079438-o005-m4-fanout_41774597_7.out
• warn
  F150W_o005 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)

  A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.

  checkpoint_m2_F150W_o005_latest.json
• warn
  F210M_o005 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)

  A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.

  checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json
• warn
  F277W_o005 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)

  A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.

  checkpoint_m2_F277W_o005_latest.json
• warn
  F070W_o005 visit 1: worst tile 105.1 mas at cell (3,5) (> 15 mas)

  15/15 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F070W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  15/15 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 91.88 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (3,5)	105.1	-90.2	-54.1	34.0	32421
  (4,4)	105.1	-83.1	-64.3	42.0	23720
  (4,5)	104.1	-87.6	-56.1	48.0	30746
  (1,4)	103.6	-88.5	-53.9	34.0	29102
  (5,4)	103.5	-89.7	-51.7	28.0	20598
  (5,5)	100.1	-79.0	-61.4	42.0	25512
  (3,3)	98.5	-89.0	-42.3	28.0	49738
  (0,5)	96.3	-70.3	-65.9	26.0	56807
  (1,5)	96.0	-73.3	-62.0	47.0	35852
  (1,0)	95.9	-69.5	-66.1	29.0	32649
  (2,5)	94.4	-65.9	-67.6	38.0	37355
  (3,4)	89.9	-76.8	-46.8	28.0	64190
  (1,3)	85.3	-72.9	-44.3	32.0	70050
  (0,4)	82.3	-74.3	-35.2	31.0	22666
  (2,4)	76.4	-59.5	-47.9	26.0	23751

• warn
  F090W_o005 visit 1: worst tile 55056.5 mas at cell (0,2) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F090W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 101.76 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (0,2)	55,056.5	-44,998.6	31,722.8	8.0	43566
  (2,0)	152.2	-129.6	-79.8	8.0	36167
  (5,1)	144.3	-105.2	-98.8	11.0	52602
  (4,0)	129.5	-103.8	-77.3	33.0	85869
  (5,0)	126.9	-107.5	-67.5	21.0	71491
  (1,2)	118.3	-79.4	-87.6	13.0	57491
  (4,4)	115.1	-91.2	-70.3	39.0	63983
  (3,0)	114.2	-86.4	-74.6	11.0	11014
  (1,3)	113.6	-76.1	-84.3	44.0	65647
  (0,4)	110.0	-88.8	-64.9	50.0	79611
  (4,5)	108.8	-87.3	-65.0	31.0	106630
  (1,0)	108.4	-87.1	-64.6	22.0	72471
  (2,2)	107.9	-85.2	-66.2	31.0	23082
  (5,4)	107.9	-92.6	-55.5	31.0	55965
  (3,5)	107.8	-88.3	-61.9	29.5	115683
  (5,3)	107.7	-89.0	-60.8	16.0	22523
  (3,3)	107.6	-86.5	-64.0	21.0	33820
  (3,2)	107.4	-84.1	-66.9	21.0	77256
  (1,1)	106.7	-91.5	-55.0	10.0	10296
  (3,1)	106.4	-64.2	-84.8	9.0	51349
  (5,5)	105.7	-81.5	-67.3	48.0	76263
  (0,0)	105.3	-88.0	-57.9	12.0	60222
  (1,4)	105.3	-78.5	-70.2	35.0	128749
  (2,4)	104.5	-76.5	-71.3	47.0	81128
  (3,4)	102.9	-82.1	-62.0	23.0	38757
  (5,2)	101.8	-87.1	-52.7	12.0	47126
  (2,3)	101.5	-68.3	-75.2	24.0	46415
  (4,3)	101.0	-76.9	-65.5	24.0	26757
  (0,5)	100.6	-73.7	-68.5	31.0	57482
  (2,5)	100.0	-74.0	-67.2	39.5	166243
  (1,5)	98.3	-73.9	-64.8	35.5	153382
  (4,2)	97.4	-74.0	-63.2	20.0	22346
  (2,1)	95.5	-73.1	-61.4	18.0	59925
  (0,1)	94.1	-75.7	-55.8	14.0	59149
  (4,1)	92.8	-70.6	-60.2	9.0	49281
  (0,3)	77.7	-60.0	-49.4	22.0	42261

• warn
  F115W_o005 visit 1: worst tile 129.7 mas at cell (1,4) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F115W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 112.72 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (1,4)	129.7	-94.3	-89.1	24.0	72005
  (1,3)	125.3	-90.5	-86.7	16.0	34968
  (5,3)	125.1	-88.8	-88.1	22.5	113786
  (3,3)	124.9	-90.9	-85.7	16.0	22022
  (4,2)	121.8	-95.1	-76.1	21.5	118257
  (5,1)	121.5	-83.1	-88.7	38.0	66688
  (5,4)	120.8	-93.6	-76.3	28.0	170094
  (0,5)	119.3	-84.8	-83.9	14.0	39990
  (3,2)	117.8	-93.3	-71.9	18.5	113137
  (2,5)	117.6	-81.5	-84.7	16.0	85264
  (2,0)	117.2	-93.6	-70.5	33.0	35008
  (1,0)	115.8	-94.1	-67.5	40.0	33648
  (4,0)	115.4	-94.4	-66.4	33.0	100275
  (2,2)	115.3	-85.8	-77.1	26.0	107551
  (0,1)	115.3	-94.8	-65.6	51.0	64083
  (5,0)	115.0	-93.0	-67.6	29.0	98692
  (3,0)	114.1	-94.8	-63.5	41.0	58995
  (1,2)	111.8	-80.8	-77.2	17.0	86461
  (4,4)	111.7	-91.1	-64.6	21.0	25199
  (2,4)	110.6	-77.9	-78.5	15.0	42871
  (4,1)	109.3	-82.6	-71.6	37.0	36829
  (0,2)	109.1	-86.1	-67.1	28.0	68967
  (4,5)	108.9	-90.0	-61.3	16.0	58627
  (3,4)	107.7	-77.6	-74.6	9.3	200591
  (0,0)	107.1	-88.2	-60.6	23.0	29572
  (2,3)	106.4	-77.9	-72.5	10.7	241328
  (3,1)	105.3	-83.5	-64.1	31.0	31625
  (3,5)	105.2	-90.5	-53.7	18.0	67360
  (0,4)	105.0	-86.1	-60.1	26.0	51416
  (0,3)	103.7	-79.2	-66.9	15.0	215362
  (4,3)	103.4	-86.8	-56.3	16.0	112520
  (5,2)	103.2	-79.8	-65.4	42.0	67849
  (5,5)	101.7	-83.8	-57.6	23.0	28303
  (2,1)	100.1	-74.1	-67.3	32.0	50868
  (1,1)	97.5	-79.1	-57.0	33.0	32853
  (1,5)	80.3	-52.1	-61.1	15.0	74222

• warn
  F140M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 9169.5 mas at cell (2,3) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F140M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 114.31 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (2,3)	9,169.5	-8,094.4	4,308.2	6.0	46471
  (1,3)	134.1	-97.6	-92.0	14.0	61301
  (5,3)	129.8	-89.5	-94.1	14.7	233428
  (5,4)	127.4	-94.3	-85.6	16.0	36845
  (3,3)	124.6	-90.3	-85.8	16.0	41622
  (0,2)	123.5	-105.2	-64.6	13.5	167595
  (3,5)	122.9	-92.3	-81.2	8.0	109929
  (4,2)	120.8	-94.7	-75.0	13.0	247894
  (4,0)	120.5	-96.0	-72.8	24.3	236339
  (0,3)	120.1	-87.0	-82.8	14.0	43891
  (4,5)	119.7	-84.6	-84.6	8.0	93578
  (1,5)	119.1	-89.0	-79.2	8.5	121677
  (1,0)	118.8	-96.0	-69.9	46.0	81662
  (2,4)	117.3	-82.2	-83.7	8.5	87814
  (2,5)	116.4	-76.7	-87.6	7.5	124254
  (0,1)	116.3	-98.0	-62.7	26.5	162071
  (2,0)	115.1	-90.6	-71.0	22.0	94947
  (1,2)	115.1	-85.7	-76.8	11.0	21182
  (3,0)	115.0	-94.6	-65.3	23.0	134672
  (5,1)	114.1	-73.7	-87.1	22.0	170399
  (2,2)	113.8	-84.7	-75.9	15.7	236724
  (4,1)	111.8	-89.4	-67.2	27.0	86766
  (4,4)	106.7	-91.8	-54.3	17.0	51022
  (0,0)	106.6	-89.5	-57.9	31.0	61291
  (3,1)	105.7	-86.8	-60.4	48.0	59864
  (2,1)	105.7	-78.6	-70.7	20.0	116140
  (5,2)	103.1	-81.4	-63.3	18.5	161014
  (3,2)	102.1	-92.3	-43.8	10.0	26111
  (0,4)	101.7	-83.1	-58.6	17.0	87006
  (0,5)	100.3	-85.1	-53.2	13.0	82920
  (5,5)	99.3	-83.4	-53.9	21.0	52531
  (5,0)	98.0	-83.4	-51.5	17.0	28962
  (1,1)	97.9	-80.9	-55.2	42.0	81882
  (1,4)	97.2	-83.6	-49.6	9.0	117849
  (3,4)	96.9	-79.5	-55.3	10.0	56066
  (4,3)	94.1	-82.0	-46.2	12.0	20345

• warn
  F150W_o005 visit 1: worst tile 9800.6 mas at cell (3,2) (> 15 mas)

  35/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F150W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 113.47 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (3,2)	9,800.6	3,840.6	9,016.7	7.0	45573
  (1,2)	9,726.7	-9,362.0	-2,638.6	6.0	37657
  (4,5)	9,601.2	-4,363.5	-8,552.3	6.0	138611
  (2,4)	9,317.6	-5,442.3	7,563.0	5.5	130991
  (4,3)	9,154.1	-1,431.4	-9,041.5	7.0	35277
  (1,5)	9,048.9	8,913.4	1,559.9	7.5	172279
  (1,3)	8,832.6	-5,972.1	-6,507.7	4.0	90224
  (0,5)	8,737.6	-5,702.7	6,620.1	5.0	122794
  (0,4)	7,865.3	-7,362.3	-2,767.7	5.0	129119
  (0,2)	7,678.2	-906.8	7,624.5	6.0	34790
  (3,3)	7,635.7	-1,451.0	7,496.5	8.0	62164
  (5,2)	6,307.5	6,093.6	1,628.7	6.0	29316
  (2,3)	5,968.7	-5,899.9	903.3	8.0	69445
  (4,2)	5,948.6	2,438.7	-5,425.7	7.0	54994
  (1,4)	5,086.5	-3,973.4	-3,175.6	6.5	169830
  (2,5)	4,927.5	2,294.0	4,360.9	6.0	167879
  (5,5)	3,409.2	1,441.2	-3,089.6	9.0	83549
  (3,5)	2,325.5	-973.4	-2,112.0	6.0	13688
  (3,4)	1,671.3	-1,364.2	-965.5	5.5	93359
  (0,3)	811.4	-559.0	-588.1	9.0	67862
  (5,4)	133.7	-97.2	-91.8	10.0	61966
  (5,1)	127.4	-88.9	-91.3	12.0	32003
  (3,0)	125.8	-99.7	-76.7	8.0	26724
  (1,0)	115.4	-92.8	-68.6	15.0	169319
  (2,0)	114.9	-82.6	-79.8	10.3	206929
  (5,3)	111.9	-60.3	-94.3	7.0	45284
  (3,1)	111.8	-93.0	-62.0	14.5	116855
  (2,1)	108.7	-81.7	-71.8	7.7	218795
  (4,1)	106.4	-77.5	-72.9	15.5	177175
  (4,4)	104.2	-92.3	-48.4	9.0	83182
  (4,0)	104.1	-94.8	-42.8	14.0	52316
  (0,0)	102.1	-91.4	-45.5	13.0	12808
  (0,1)	102.1	-91.9	-44.4	9.0	36427
  (1,1)	99.0	-82.2	-55.1	10.0	20644
  (5,0)	92.8	-81.7	-44.0	10.0	50957
  (2,2)	89.4	-82.9	-33.4	7.0	48439

• warn
  F182M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 9778.4 mas at cell (2,3) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F182M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 114.57 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (2,3)	9,778.4	-9,758.7	-621.0	8.0	86357
  (5,4)	9,383.9	7,698.8	-5,365.3	5.0	88883
  (4,2)	9,356.3	-8,305.3	-4,308.3	8.0	72810
  (3,1)	9,115.1	-5,086.4	7,564.0	6.0	25705
  (0,5)	8,410.7	-7,759.9	-3,244.0	5.5	145255
  (0,3)	7,653.0	5,040.1	5,758.9	10.0	83603
  (3,3)	7,484.5	-5,428.8	-5,152.2	7.0	77696
  (0,4)	7,471.2	-5,187.6	-5,376.6	5.5	157749
  (4,3)	7,116.7	-6,706.0	-2,382.7	7.0	50564
  (3,5)	6,892.9	-5,431.2	-4,244.2	6.0	177109
  (2,1)	6,669.3	-5,978.4	-2,956.1	6.0	40917
  (5,2)	6,311.6	6,098.0	1,627.9	7.0	45328
  (2,0)	5,966.5	-5,887.6	-966.8	8.0	51285
  (0,2)	5,786.1	2,726.6	5,103.4	8.0	50531
  (1,2)	5,727.2	-5,185.7	-2,431.0	9.0	53484
  (4,4)	5,687.1	-25.4	5,687.0	6.5	118103
  (2,4)	5,074.0	4,760.5	-1,755.8	6.5	159225
  (4,5)	4,793.2	-440.2	4,772.9	6.0	164389
  (5,3)	3,440.7	3,439.0	-108.5	8.0	63993
  (5,0)	2,757.9	-235.7	-2,747.8	8.0	72272
  (1,3)	2,484.0	-255.3	-2,470.8	5.0	9728
  (2,5)	2,302.1	-1,969.4	-1,192.1	5.0	16867
  (3,2)	2,227.1	-1,846.8	1,244.7	7.0	60805
  (3,4)	1,670.9	-1,363.4	-965.8	6.0	129865
  (1,5)	1,339.2	906.1	-986.1	5.0	17613
  (1,4)	1,313.4	-1,312.4	-50.2	5.0	17549
  (2,2)	188.8	-110.4	-153.1	10.0	68160
  (5,1)	132.9	-79.7	-106.4	8.0	52493
  (3,0)	128.2	-93.7	-87.5	7.0	43777
  (4,0)	119.1	-105.0	-56.3	9.0	77872
  (4,1)	118.4	-100.6	-62.3	8.0	37961
  (0,0)	114.2	-103.5	-48.1	13.0	24886
  (1,0)	110.3	-94.5	-56.9	9.0	41642
  (5,5)	99.9	-91.6	-39.8	5.0	107167
  (0,1)	91.9	-85.6	-33.4	8.0	57800
  (1,1)	83.2	-70.8	-43.6	9.0	38029

• warn
  F210M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 9780.3 mas at cell (2,3) (> 15 mas)

  32/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 100.70 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (2,3)	9,780.3	-9,760.9	-616.4	4.5	91053
  (3,2)	9,697.0	-8,446.0	4,764.1	7.0	67526
  (4,2)	9,631.9	-3,488.9	8,977.8	8.0	79440
  (5,4)	9,382.8	7,697.6	-5,365.1	5.5	105000
  (4,3)	9,074.9	-8,503.8	3,168.3	8.0	58987
  (2,2)	8,795.0	1,313.2	-8,696.4	10.0	75239
  (0,5)	8,400.5	-7,749.7	-3,242.0	6.0	150220
  (3,1)	8,065.6	-4,505.0	6,690.2	8.0	35176
  (4,4)	7,689.0	-4,764.8	-6,034.7	5.5	132776
  (0,3)	7,673.9	5,053.0	5,775.5	4.5	87729
  (4,5)	7,310.1	-5,956.1	4,238.1	6.0	171940
  (5,3)	6,639.0	4,024.4	-5,280.1	10.0	70933
  (5,2)	6,311.0	6,097.8	1,626.6	7.0	52441
  (3,3)	6,075.9	-5,438.3	-2,709.5	9.0	82819
  (2,0)	5,966.6	-5,887.8	-966.7	8.0	63968
  (5,1)	5,934.0	-5,702.9	-1,639.9	7.0	60659
  (0,2)	5,781.3	2,726.4	5,098.0	8.0	56089
  (1,2)	5,734.1	-5,180.3	-2,458.6	9.0	60264
  (3,4)	4,949.2	-3,226.1	3,753.3	6.0	144533
  (1,3)	2,485.2	-255.6	-2,472.0	5.0	10288
  (3,5)	2,447.7	-2,150.0	1,170.0	4.0	16348
  (2,5)	2,061.9	-2,046.1	-254.8	4.0	17087
  (0,4)	1,443.0	-228.5	-1,424.8	6.0	165093
  (1,4)	1,314.2	-1,313.2	-51.6	5.0	18184
  (1,0)	132.0	-99.1	-87.2	12.0	53419
  (2,4)	123.7	-88.4	-86.6	7.0	166043
  (0,0)	115.1	-103.2	-51.1	13.0	32796
  (3,0)	112.2	-92.9	-63.0	8.0	51502
  (4,0)	110.9	-101.6	-44.5	12.0	88351
  (4,1)	107.4	-96.4	-47.3	9.0	49192
  (5,5)	102.5	-91.2	-46.8	7.5	116844
  (0,1)	102.1	-91.5	-45.2	9.0	66971
  (2,1)	92.7	-78.7	-48.9	8.0	50430
  (5,0)	90.2	-76.4	-47.8	8.0	80560
  (1,1)	82.0	-68.9	-44.4	10.0	48197
  (1,5)	80.1	-57.6	-55.8	5.0	18219

• warn
  F277W_o005 visit 1: worst tile 28420.0 mas at cell (0,0) (> 15 mas)

  35/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F277W_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 2787.47 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (0,0)	28,420.0	-28,265.8	2,956.9	5.5	143003
  (5,3)	28,017.3	-25,461.8	11,690.5	7.0	165392
  (2,2)	27,904.4	1,700.3	27,852.6	6.0	173366
  (5,2)	27,352.6	-27,330.6	1,095.2	6.0	153128
  (5,1)	26,952.2	26,852.3	2,318.7	5.7	220283
  (5,0)	22,366.4	1,495.3	22,316.4	4.7	202605
  (3,1)	22,353.3	-6,049.1	21,519.3	6.5	163603
  (3,2)	21,238.4	-2,296.2	21,113.9	7.0	152834
  (1,2)	19,560.7	-9,084.3	17,323.3	6.0	167142
  (4,3)	9,755.2	6,816.7	-6,978.3	5.0	17617
  (4,2)	9,623.5	-3,475.9	8,973.8	7.0	21749
  (3,0)	9,519.7	6,553.5	-6,904.8	5.0	21324
  (0,4)	9,508.8	-445.9	-9,498.3	7.0	46357
  (5,5)	9,383.4	-9,310.2	-1,170.1	5.0	28494
  (1,5)	9,224.8	-9,224.8	-8.8	6.0	47233
  (3,4)	8,709.1	8,556.8	-1,621.7	9.0	45761
  (1,0)	8,323.7	3,894.3	7,356.6	6.0	22773
  (2,3)	8,302.5	8,288.6	-479.9	7.0	27809
  (4,0)	8,246.4	-4,173.6	-7,112.2	6.0	29376
  (5,4)	8,012.5	-4,417.8	-6,684.5	6.0	33603
  (4,4)	7,905.6	-7,302.4	3,028.9	6.0	39463
  (3,5)	7,874.1	-7,442.4	2,571.6	8.0	43714
  (1,1)	7,496.4	4,359.4	6,098.5	6.0	18153
  (0,1)	7,213.3	-3,930.2	-6,048.6	5.0	21399
  (4,1)	7,015.7	3,697.0	5,962.6	6.0	17115
  (1,4)	6,727.0	-4,946.8	-4,558.6	7.0	53865
  (0,5)	6,282.3	-5,575.4	-2,895.3	6.0	33147
  (2,5)	5,918.3	-5,026.2	-3,124.7	6.0	44002
  (2,0)	5,797.2	-5,292.2	2,366.5	5.0	24213
  (2,1)	5,537.5	-364.9	-5,525.5	5.0	19617
  (0,2)	4,802.9	-4,497.3	-1,686.0	5.5	140355
  (4,5)	4,779.4	-429.3	4,760.1	7.0	42595
  (1,3)	4,675.4	-1,034.7	-4,559.5	6.0	28475
  (3,3)	3,285.9	522.2	3,244.1	5.0	22430
  (0,3)	1,773.6	27.6	-1,773.3	6.0	23295
  (2,4)	1,698.1	-636.3	-1,574.4	9.0	47289

• warn
  F300M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 21234.6 mas at cell (3,2) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F300M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 101.00 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (3,2)	21,234.6	-2,294.4	21,110.2	6.5	143897
  (1,2)	18,419.6	-12,327.7	13,686.1	5.5	164189
  (0,4)	9,496.3	-448.4	-9,485.7	7.0	48639
  (2,3)	8,582.9	-8,284.5	2,243.4	5.0	28993
  (3,5)	7,878.1	-7,446.3	2,572.5	8.0	46181
  (1,5)	7,391.7	-6,513.8	-3,493.9	7.0	53250
  (0,5)	7,125.4	7,031.8	1,150.7	7.0	36458
  (3,4)	6,850.8	-3,247.1	-6,032.4	7.0	46498
  (2,5)	4,741.6	1,685.6	4,431.9	7.0	47243
  (3,3)	4,632.4	-3,947.5	2,424.1	5.0	23281
  (4,2)	147.4	-84.8	-120.6	7.0	159928
  (0,2)	145.2	-119.1	-83.0	5.5	133287
  (2,2)	145.0	-88.3	-115.0	8.0	175089
  (4,5)	143.6	-103.8	-99.2	8.0	46841
  (4,0)	134.4	-111.5	-75.0	5.3	245366
  (3,0)	130.6	-94.8	-89.9	7.0	208731
  (2,0)	125.5	-99.1	-77.0	6.0	177444
  (1,3)	123.3	-88.8	-85.5	5.7	251555
  (0,0)	120.3	-101.4	-64.7	6.0	121881
  (5,3)	119.3	-84.4	-84.2	9.0	169918
  (5,4)	115.3	-102.4	-53.2	8.0	33979
  (4,1)	110.8	-87.1	-68.5	10.0	160212
  (5,0)	110.5	-76.3	-80.0	6.7	214689
  (0,1)	110.4	-103.7	-37.7	6.0	20718
  (2,4)	110.2	-80.7	-75.1	8.0	49667
  (4,4)	107.6	-99.2	-41.7	10.0	39191
  (1,0)	105.9	-89.0	-57.5	9.5	175180
  (5,5)	103.4	-91.6	-47.9	8.0	31928
  (1,4)	101.6	-86.9	-52.6	9.0	57826
  (3,1)	100.9	-81.1	-60.1	8.5	152848
  (1,1)	98.9	-88.3	-44.7	8.0	16055
  (0,3)	97.1	-50.6	-82.8	6.0	24407
  (5,1)	96.4	-60.8	-74.7	5.3	220956
  (5,2)	93.2	-64.7	-67.0	6.5	146264
  (2,1)	90.5	-82.6	-36.8	9.5	173049
  (4,3)	87.2	-81.7	-30.5	6.0	17719

• warn
  F335M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 24662.5 mas at cell (2,3) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F335M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 100.65 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (2,3)	24,662.5	10,114.1	22,493.2	5.3	251210
  (0,0)	23,420.5	-23,280.5	-2,556.7	5.5	131511
  (1,2)	13,431.4	12,333.6	5,318.5	7.0	153752
  (3,5)	7,369.1	-1,494.5	7,215.9	7.0	45457
  (2,4)	7,195.3	7,168.7	617.8	8.0	47831
  (0,5)	7,125.5	7,032.3	1,148.3	7.0	35359
  (4,4)	6,646.0	-1,631.5	6,442.6	7.0	39280
  (1,3)	6,493.2	177.9	6,490.8	6.0	26920
  (2,5)	2,568.6	-628.5	-2,490.5	7.0	46335
  (3,4)	1,671.6	-1,367.9	-960.8	8.0	45728
  (2,2)	139.7	-89.9	-107.0	10.0	164501
  (0,2)	137.5	-114.3	-76.4	6.5	133428
  (4,2)	132.4	-85.2	-101.3	9.0	130226
  (1,0)	132.2	-94.2	-92.8	9.0	21956
  (3,0)	128.2	-90.3	-91.0	7.7	193261
  (2,0)	123.8	-98.3	-75.2	7.3	177861
  (5,0)	120.4	-74.1	-94.9	7.3	211324
  (4,0)	117.7	-95.2	-69.2	6.7	227457
  (3,3)	112.8	-84.3	-75.0	6.3	202123
  (5,3)	111.6	-62.5	-92.4	9.0	176835
  (5,4)	109.8	-83.7	-71.1	7.8	295917
  (4,1)	108.0	-87.8	-62.9	9.5	111679
  (1,5)	105.4	-91.3	-52.5	8.0	51487
  (3,1)	102.6	-81.0	-62.9	10.5	108816
  (4,5)	102.5	-94.3	-40.2	10.0	44947
  (1,4)	100.0	-88.4	-46.7	9.0	55611
  (5,1)	100.0	-62.8	-77.8	10.0	174871
  (0,4)	98.5	-88.5	-43.2	8.0	45794
  (0,1)	97.6	-87.3	-43.6	9.0	21065
  (2,1)	97.2	-74.0	-63.0	10.5	149117
  (5,2)	96.8	-70.6	-66.2	6.5	135683
  (3,2)	96.6	-87.6	-40.6	5.5	92893
  (0,3)	95.3	-50.0	-81.1	8.0	23453
  (5,5)	95.1	-82.9	-46.6	10.0	32128
  (1,1)	93.5	-80.2	-48.1	7.0	16408
  (4,3)	90.6	-80.6	-41.4	6.0	17720

• warn
  F360M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 26302.8 mas at cell (1,2) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F360M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 92.87 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (1,2)	26,302.8	1,073.9	26,280.9	6.0	167651
  (0,0)	23,423.4	-23,284.5	-2,546.7	6.0	157111
  (3,2)	16,355.1	10,742.3	12,332.6	5.5	124310
  (2,5)	9,651.8	-4,144.5	-8,716.7	7.0	46797
  (3,4)	1,672.2	-1,369.1	-960.0	8.0	45726
  (0,2)	138.6	-115.9	-76.0	7.5	140874
  (2,0)	133.4	-111.4	-73.5	7.3	197961
  (0,5)	131.9	-81.4	-103.8	9.0	36846
  (1,0)	126.8	-93.4	-85.8	9.0	24432
  (3,0)	125.3	-93.5	-83.5	7.3	218018
  (5,0)	123.8	-77.5	-96.6	9.0	223234
  (2,2)	123.3	-87.1	-87.3	10.0	169402
  (1,3)	123.1	-90.7	-83.2	8.3	246670
  (5,3)	114.7	-68.7	-91.9	6.7	179731
  (4,2)	112.4	-85.6	-72.8	11.0	144869
  (3,3)	111.6	-89.9	-66.1	6.3	202006
  (4,1)	111.5	-91.4	-63.8	10.0	146254
  (5,4)	111.2	-90.0	-65.2	8.0	316176
  (4,0)	110.2	-101.7	-42.5	8.0	27638
  (3,5)	110.1	-107.5	23.7	7.0	44513
  (3,1)	109.5	-82.8	-71.6	10.5	149786
  (2,4)	109.1	-82.9	-70.9	8.0	46708
  (5,2)	105.8	-80.7	-68.3	7.5	141732
  (1,5)	102.2	-85.6	-55.8	9.0	52421
  (4,4)	101.7	-92.2	-43.0	9.0	39655
  (5,1)	101.2	-64.4	-78.1	6.3	204955
  (0,4)	100.9	-92.6	-40.1	10.0	47095
  (4,3)	100.4	-83.2	-56.2	5.3	207601
  (0,3)	99.2	-60.5	-78.6	8.0	221775
  (5,5)	97.8	-89.0	-40.5	11.0	32702
  (0,1)	97.3	-87.7	-42.3	10.0	22787
  (1,4)	96.4	-86.1	-43.2	15.0	55582
  (1,1)	95.6	-84.0	-45.6	8.0	18656
  (4,5)	93.1	-83.6	-41.1	12.0	46116
  (2,1)	91.7	-81.6	-41.8	8.0	18191
  (2,3)	83.9	-42.2	-72.6	5.7	253253

• warn
  F410M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 27272.2 mas at cell (0,0) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F410M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 100.20 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (0,0)	27,272.2	-15,151.4	22,676.2	7.0	173574
  (1,2)	8,499.5	6,312.9	5,691.1	6.0	17611
  (0,5)	134.7	-84.5	-104.8	10.0	37483
  (4,2)	132.9	-91.1	-96.7	10.5	154582
  (0,2)	130.8	-109.3	-71.7	9.5	142386
  (2,0)	130.7	-111.0	-69.0	7.7	208384
  (3,0)	125.8	-93.4	-84.3	8.0	230400
  (5,0)	123.9	-77.1	-96.9	10.0	236951
  (1,0)	121.8	-91.2	-80.7	11.0	25485
  (5,4)	121.5	-101.5	-66.7	9.5	323761
  (3,3)	115.3	-87.9	-74.6	8.0	199306
  (2,4)	114.7	-85.8	-76.1	12.0	48638
  (1,3)	114.4	-75.1	-86.2	11.7	249646
  (4,1)	113.8	-94.2	-63.8	11.5	149714
  (2,2)	113.1	-85.6	-73.9	8.3	182656
  (4,0)	112.5	-102.4	-46.7	12.0	28437
  (5,3)	108.6	-78.1	-75.4	8.3	189521
  (5,5)	108.5	-83.5	-69.4	14.0	34085
  (3,1)	107.9	-84.7	-66.9	11.0	152879
  (3,5)	107.1	-94.8	-49.8	12.0	46394
  (2,3)	106.5	-74.2	-76.4	6.7	254507
  (4,5)	106.5	-91.9	-53.7	18.0	47148
  (4,4)	106.1	-96.2	-44.6	14.0	40209
  (5,1)	105.0	-70.2	-78.1	7.7	214894
  (0,1)	103.9	-96.2	-39.2	11.0	23943
  (3,4)	102.8	-88.9	-51.5	9.0	46877
  (0,3)	102.1	-67.6	-76.4	8.7	220893
  (2,5)	101.1	-91.8	-42.3	9.0	48597
  (0,4)	100.4	-89.1	-46.3	14.0	47270
  (1,4)	99.9	-89.9	-43.5	19.0	56181
  (1,1)	99.2	-86.9	-47.8	10.0	19426
  (5,2)	98.1	-70.3	-68.4	9.5	150981
  (1,5)	95.7	-79.8	-52.9	15.0	53953
  (3,2)	92.8	-83.8	-39.9	7.0	124323
  (2,1)	90.8	-80.4	-42.2	9.0	19026
  (4,3)	90.7	-83.1	-36.2	9.0	19282

• warn
  F430M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 134.2 mas at cell (4,2) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F430M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 99.21 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (4,2)	134.2	-94.1	-95.7	16.5	152119
  (2,0)	121.9	-100.7	-68.7	15.7	191702
  (3,0)	120.2	-95.6	-72.9	16.0	206296
  (0,2)	119.7	-102.9	-61.2	15.5	141320
  (4,0)	119.6	-97.7	-69.1	21.7	230850
  (1,0)	119.5	-94.7	-72.9	17.0	23852
  (2,4)	114.0	-82.4	-78.7	24.0	47629
  (2,2)	113.2	-91.1	-67.2	24.0	177234
  (5,2)	110.5	-88.0	-66.8	15.5	149077
  (1,3)	109.7	-80.0	-75.1	16.3	241753
  (0,0)	109.6	-96.8	-51.4	15.5	157274
  (0,1)	108.6	-99.3	-44.0	19.0	22469
  (3,3)	108.5	-82.9	-70.0	13.7	196044
  (4,1)	108.5	-88.0	-63.4	28.0	149883
  (5,3)	106.7	-77.2	-73.6	12.0	180734
  (3,1)	105.1	-86.0	-60.4	23.0	149272
  (5,1)	104.8	-73.7	-74.5	12.7	214816
  (3,2)	103.5	-88.8	-53.0	16.5	132645
  (0,4)	102.7	-88.4	-52.3	31.0	46796
  (5,4)	102.1	-85.1	-56.4	24.0	35363
  (1,4)	101.3	-86.1	-53.5	31.0	55233
  (3,5)	101.0	-88.4	-49.0	30.0	46399
  (2,3)	100.9	-74.1	-68.6	10.7	246117
  (5,5)	100.3	-82.0	-57.8	30.0	33136
  (1,1)	100.0	-87.7	-48.1	19.0	17959
  (5,0)	99.8	-84.7	-52.7	15.0	23388
  (4,4)	99.4	-87.4	-47.4	24.0	38189
  (0,3)	99.2	-78.6	-60.5	13.0	213674
  (2,1)	98.7	-79.5	-58.6	22.0	170620
  (1,2)	98.2	-81.0	-55.6	12.5	169172
  (4,3)	97.9	-83.9	-50.4	16.0	18052
  (1,5)	96.6	-79.4	-55.1	30.0	53966
  (3,4)	96.5	-80.4	-53.3	22.0	45393
  (2,5)	95.5	-82.3	-48.5	29.0	48714
  (4,5)	94.8	-78.9	-52.5	38.0	45741
  (0,5)	91.6	-78.6	-47.0	22.0	37413

• warn
  F480M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 122.4 mas at cell (2,0) (> 15 mas)

  36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.

  checkpoint_m2_F480M_o005_latest.json

  what is affected, and why

  36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 101.55 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.

  cell	off (mas)	dRA	dDec	contrast	pairs
  (2,0)	122.4	-100.2	-70.4	16.3	183647
  (5,1)	120.5	-86.3	-84.1	21.0	20523
  (0,2)	118.9	-101.5	-62.1	18.0	137020
  (1,3)	116.5	-83.6	-81.2	19.7	230677
  (4,2)	115.9	-89.9	-73.3	20.5	138291
  (4,0)	115.2	-99.6	-57.9	24.0	25338
  (2,4)	114.9	-83.6	-78.9	29.0	44936
  (3,0)	114.3	-95.7	-62.6	20.0	19496
  (0,0)	114.2	-97.1	-60.2	20.0	156120
  (2,2)	113.1	-91.6	-66.5	25.0	168372
  (0,1)	112.9	-103.7	-44.8	22.0	22121
  (4,1)	112.1	-89.5	-67.5	30.5	143147
  (5,3)	111.2	-84.1	-72.9	20.5	174660
  (1,0)	109.4	-92.7	-58.2	22.0	21940
  (3,3)	109.2	-84.2	-69.6	15.0	189254
  (3,1)	107.5	-88.6	-60.8	24.5	144692
  (5,2)	106.3	-83.9	-65.3	19.5	133430
  (5,0)	105.5	-80.3	-68.4	15.3	209876
  (3,5)	103.7	-89.1	-53.1	34.0	44319
  (3,2)	103.2	-87.4	-55.0	20.0	128893
  (5,4)	103.1	-86.2	-56.6	25.0	34758
  (1,2)	102.9	-83.6	-60.0	16.0	162701
  (2,1)	102.4	-82.3	-60.8	24.0	166102
  (1,4)	102.0	-86.3	-54.5	37.0	53444
  (0,4)	101.7	-85.2	-55.6	42.0	45510
  (2,3)	101.7	-75.2	-68.4	12.3	237810
  (1,1)	101.1	-89.3	-47.4	21.0	17372
  (5,5)	101.0	-81.5	-59.6	33.0	33768
  (4,3)	100.2	-85.3	-52.6	18.0	17573
  (0,3)	99.1	-71.1	-69.1	13.0	200115
  (3,4)	98.2	-81.1	-55.4	27.0	42652
  (4,4)	98.1	-84.6	-49.8	29.0	36337
  (2,5)	98.0	-84.3	-50.0	31.0	46745
  (1,5)	95.8	-78.4	-55.0	28.0	51114
  (4,5)	95.7	-79.0	-54.1	36.0	44051
  (0,5)	95.1	-82.6	-47.1	24.0	37368

• ok
  F070W_o005: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus

  checkpoint_m2_F070W_o005_latest.json
• ok
  m7 cross-band product absent

  catalogs/basic_*_photometry_tables_merged_*.fits
• ok
  m8 cross-band product absent

  catalogs/basic_*_photometry_tables_merged_*.fits