jwst-gc pipeline monitor

crowded_l3 · 2026-09-19 08:34 EDT
1 runs 1 failing 0 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

crowded_l3 9438/o006 4d ago
7 fail27 warn
F070WF090WF115WF140MF150WF182MF210MF277WF300MF335MF360MF410MF430MF480M

Detail

crowded_l3 · 9438/o006

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/crowded_l3 back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F070W3232·3257133333destreak
F090W3232·3260133333destreak
F115W3232·3260133333destreak
F140M3232·323······destreak
F150W3232·323······destreak
F182M3232·323······destreak
F210M3232·323······destreak
F277W88·83······destreak
F300M88·860133333destreak
F335M88·83······destreak
F360M88·83······destreak
F410M88·860133333destreak
F430M88·860133333destreak
F480M88·860133333destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 9438/o006.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F070W_o006 1 32 1 0 8 4.30 same-star 1/1 44.1 (1,4) 2026-09-11T15:49:26Z
F090W_o006 1 32 0 0 36 0.67 same-star 35/35 32.0 (1,5) 2026-09-11T16:14:23Z
F115W_o006 1 32 0 0 550 0.53 same-star 36/36 27.8 (0,4) 2026-09-11T16:42:50Z
F140M_o006 1 32 0 0 334 7.95 same-star 36/36 9798.5 (0,3) 2026-09-06T19:30:17Z
F150W_o006 1 32 0 0 269 103.58 histogram 28/36 9923.8 (5,1) 2026-09-06T20:41:46Z
F182M_o006 1 32 0 0 173 142.13 histogram 32/36 9604.5 (0,5) 2026-09-06T22:03:06Z
F210M_o006 1 32 0 0 171 75.22 histogram 28/36 9836.9 (0,2) 2026-09-06T23:13:48Z
F277W_o006 1 8 0 0 860 2648.02 histogram 36/36 28122.3 (5,2) 2026-09-06T23:50:06Z
F300M_o006 1 8 0 0 948 1.91 same-star 36/36 28073.4 (5,2) 2026-09-11T17:13:37Z
F335M_o006 1 8 0 0 1025 13.93 same-star 35/36 27754.3 (0,5) 2026-09-07T01:07:20Z
F360M_o006 1 8 0 0 1006 11.46 same-star 35/36 21791.8 (3,2) 2026-09-07T01:53:43Z
F410M_o006 1 8 0 0 1092 1.38 same-star 36/36 28291.1 (0,5) 2026-09-11T17:28:43Z
F430M_o006 1 8 0 0 811 0.37 same-star 36/36 33.3 (5,5) 2026-09-11T17:43:08Z
F480M_o006 1 8 0 0 818 0.41 same-star 36/36 29.9 (1,5) 2026-09-11T17:56:49Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

phaseproductspipeline tag(s)
m7242026-09-14_PR883_321241f-dirty (24)
m832026-09-14_PR883_321241f-dirty (3)

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • fail
    F070W_o006 visit 1: consensus not formed
    The exposures of this visit could not be brought into a common frame, so nothing downstream of m2 is trustworthy for it.
    checkpoint_m2_F070W_o006_latest.json
  • fail
    F070W_o006: 1/32 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F070W_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 1/8 detectors — confined to nrca4, which points at a detector-local defect (distortion reference, a bad filteroffset, or one chip's frames never re-aligned) rather than a whole-frame misalignment. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrca4 visit 1: dRA 4.6, dDec -2.3 masnrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±6 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrca41/4
    nrca10/4
    nrca20/4
    nrca30/4
    nrcb10/4
    nrcb20/4
    nrcb30/4
    nrcb40/4
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrca44.6-2.35.227.040110.0
  • fail
    F150W_o006 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F150W_o006_latest.json
  • fail
    F182M_o006 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_o006_latest.json
  • fail
    F210M_o006 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.00 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o006_latest.json
  • fail
    F335M_o006 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.33 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_o006_latest.json
  • fail
    F360M_o006 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.67 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    m7: 24 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • warn
    m8: 3 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
  • warn
    F115W_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F140M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F150W_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F150W_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F182M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F210M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F277W_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F335M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F360M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F430M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F430M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F480M_o006 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F070W_o006: 4 exposure(s) could not be verified
    Recorded as could-not-verify: the reference tie was not coherent, or the gross cross-check (100 mas) failed, so no correction was applied.
    checkpoint_m2_F070W_o006_latest.json
  • warn
    F070W_o006 visit 1: worst tile 44.1 mas at cell (1,4) (> 15 mas)
    1/1 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F070W_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    1/1 cells exceed 15 mas, and every one of them is on the mosaic EDGE — that is usually thin coverage (few exposures, so few pairs per cell) rather than a distortion error. Check the pair counts in the table before treating it as a defect. The bulk tie for this visit is 4.30 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (1,4): 44.1 mas, contrast 10
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,4)44.135.5-26.110.055897
  • warn
    F090W_o006 visit 1: worst tile 32.0 mas at cell (1,5) (> 15 mas)
    35/35 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F090W_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    12/35 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.67 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 10.0 mas, contrast 19cell (0,1): 9.1 mas, contrast 30cell (0,2): 6.5 mas, contrast 13cell (0,3): 14.4 mas, contrast 14cell (0,4): 17.3 mas, contrast 15cell (1,0): 8.5 mas, contrast 22cell (1,1): 10.7 mas, contrast 28cell (1,2): 9.5 mas, contrast 14cell (1,3): 7.5 mas, contrast 15cell (1,4): 17.9 mas, contrast 21cell (1,5): 32.0 mas, contrast 12cell (2,0): 31.0 mas, contrast 12cell (2,1): 13.3 mas, contrast 21cell (2,2): 4.7 mas, contrast 13cell (2,3): 15.4 mas, contrast 11cell (2,4): 16.1 mas, contrast 10cell (2,5): 25.4 mas, contrast 19cell (3,0): 19.1 mas, contrast 17cell (3,1): 17.4 mas, contrast 17cell (3,2): 8.7 mas, contrast 16cell (3,3): 17.3 mas, contrast 16cell (3,4): 6.6 mas, contrast 9cell (3,5): 10.1 mas, contrast 18cell (4,0): 9.6 mas, contrast 17cell (4,1): 7.9 mas, contrast 16cell (4,2): 9.6 mas, contrast 9cell (4,3): 10.9 mas, contrast 12cell (4,4): 9.9 mas, contrast 26cell (4,5): 7.9 mas, contrast 21cell (5,0): 23.1 mas, contrast 21cell (5,1): 12.9 mas, contrast 12cell (5,2): 19.6 mas, contrast 9cell (5,3): 6.5 mas, contrast 10cell (5,4): 11.4 mas, contrast 23cell (5,5): 13.1 mas, contrast 24
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,5)32.030.9-8.412.057924
    (2,0)31.0-30.92.512.029380
    (2,5)25.422.9-11.019.028841
    (5,0)23.1-16.7-16.021.033504
    (5,2)19.618.9-5.19.068025
    (3,0)19.1-18.64.217.027154
    (1,4)17.917.91.421.038950
    (3,1)17.4-12.212.417.035739
    (3,3)17.3-16.9-3.816.033371
    (0,4)17.315.08.615.076273
    (2,4)16.115.54.310.022236
    (2,3)15.411.89.911.025657
  • warn
    F115W_o006 visit 1: worst tile 27.8 mas at cell (0,4) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    21/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.53 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 14.5 mas, contrast 32cell (0,1): 10.3 mas, contrast 21cell (0,2): 12.7 mas, contrast 15cell (0,3): 13.2 mas, contrast 14cell (0,4): 27.8 mas, contrast 19cell (0,5): 18.6 mas, contrast 21cell (1,0): 16.0 mas, contrast 22cell (1,1): 9.2 mas, contrast 22cell (1,2): 12.1 mas, contrast 19cell (1,3): 16.0 mas, contrast 17cell (1,4): 20.5 mas, contrast 24cell (1,5): 23.1 mas, contrast 29cell (2,0): 20.0 mas, contrast 24cell (2,1): 14.9 mas, contrast 16cell (2,2): 4.6 mas, contrast 11cell (2,3): 11.2 mas, contrast 13cell (2,4): 17.1 mas, contrast 23cell (2,5): 17.8 mas, contrast 23cell (3,0): 21.7 mas, contrast 37cell (3,1): 22.2 mas, contrast 29cell (3,2): 5.7 mas, contrast 11cell (3,3): 15.6 mas, contrast 14cell (3,4): 14.1 mas, contrast 12cell (3,5): 16.4 mas, contrast 21cell (4,0): 23.3 mas, contrast 30cell (4,1): 14.1 mas, contrast 22cell (4,2): 11.6 mas, contrast 14cell (4,3): 9.4 mas, contrast 16cell (4,4): 16.1 mas, contrast 24cell (4,5): 19.4 mas, contrast 29cell (5,0): 18.8 mas, contrast 16cell (5,1): 10.1 mas, contrast 16cell (5,2): 18.0 mas, contrast 10cell (5,3): 19.3 mas, contrast 17cell (5,4): 19.3 mas, contrast 21cell (5,5): 19.5 mas, contrast 22
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,4)27.824.2-13.719.026324
    (4,0)23.3-21.29.730.027889
    (1,5)23.122.4-5.529.015600
    (3,1)22.2-19.810.229.044215
    (3,0)21.7-20.57.037.032127
    (1,4)20.518.2-9.324.030305
    (2,0)20.0-18.08.624.037022
    (5,5)19.514.513.122.031354
    (4,5)19.48.8-17.429.046225
    (5,4)19.317.9-7.421.047827
    (5,3)19.38.5-17.417.022433
    (5,0)18.8-13.6-12.916.020727
    (0,5)18.618.33.521.054520
    (5,2)18.0-13.9-11.410.017194
    (2,5)17.817.2-4.623.035653
    (2,4)17.115.76.623.019390
    (3,5)16.414.6-7.521.041386
    (4,4)16.1-6.1-14.924.051126
    (1,0)16.0-9.413.022.053327
    (1,3)16.07.214.317.039944
    (3,3)15.6-14.4-6.114.031833
  • warn
    F140M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 9798.5 mas at cell (0,3) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    35/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 7.95 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 28.1 mas, contrast 10cell (0,1): 23.2 mas, contrast 8cell (0,2): 30.9 mas, contrast 14cell (0,3): 9798.5 mas, contrast 8cell (0,4): 27.1 mas, contrast 17cell (0,5): 17.5 mas, contrast 14cell (1,0): 20.2 mas, contrast 10cell (1,1): 18.8 mas, contrast 8cell (1,2): 16.7 mas, contrast 12cell (1,3): 17.7 mas, contrast 13cell (1,4): 25.5 mas, contrast 23cell (1,5): 21.4 mas, contrast 29cell (2,0): 31.0 mas, contrast 22cell (2,1): 23.5 mas, contrast 8cell (2,2): 5110.3 mas, contrast 8cell (2,3): 25.2 mas, contrast 11cell (2,4): 14.5 mas, contrast 19cell (2,5): 18.6 mas, contrast 15cell (3,0): 29.2 mas, contrast 23cell (3,1): 29.2 mas, contrast 11cell (3,2): 18.3 mas, contrast 10cell (3,3): 24.7 mas, contrast 15cell (3,4): 26.5 mas, contrast 15cell (3,5): 27.7 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 25.5 mas, contrast 29cell (4,1): 22.1 mas, contrast 11cell (4,2): 28.8 mas, contrast 12cell (4,3): 24.9 mas, contrast 10cell (4,4): 27.2 mas, contrast 9cell (4,5): 24.3 mas, contrast 10cell (5,0): 31.4 mas, contrast 19cell (5,1): 17.5 mas, contrast 18cell (5,2): 32.3 mas, contrast 8cell (5,3): 23.7 mas, contrast 14cell (5,4): 18.2 mas, contrast 8cell (5,5): 24.3 mas, contrast 14
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,3)9,798.5-9,433.92,648.38.061434
    (2,2)5,110.3-3,915.2-3,284.38.073311
    (5,2)32.3-28.5-15.18.040486
    (5,0)31.4-27.6-15.119.042981
    (2,0)31.0-28.4-12.522.079755
    (0,2)30.97.929.914.072944
    (3,0)29.2-26.811.523.070918
    (3,1)29.2-27.410.111.090682
    (4,2)28.8-13.025.712.056134
    (0,0)28.1-26.88.510.593770
    (3,5)27.717.2-21.76.591074
    (4,4)27.2-13.0-23.99.0115038
    (0,4)27.116.2-21.717.061035
    (3,4)26.5-13.8-22.715.066072
    (4,0)25.5-23.1-10.929.058004
    (1,4)25.515.4-20.323.075077
    (2,3)25.2-20.7-14.411.055122
    (4,3)24.9-23.19.110.088021
    (3,3)24.720.4-13.915.068842
    (4,5)24.312.3-20.910.5101409
    (5,5)24.316.417.914.077067
    (5,3)23.73.0-23.514.051956
    (2,1)23.5-22.4-7.17.596000
    (0,1)23.2-19.512.58.0111540
    (4,1)22.1-19.8-9.911.098948
    (1,5)21.413.7-16.529.048691
    (1,0)20.2-18.2-8.79.5114157
    (1,1)18.8-8.217.08.0112976
    (2,5)18.616.5-8.715.084312
    (3,2)18.3-14.3-11.510.065875
    (5,4)18.2-16.2-8.38.598543
    (1,3)17.76.916.313.079801
    (0,5)17.512.4-12.314.023337
    (5,1)17.5-13.2-11.518.060078
    (1,2)16.71.6-16.612.078302
  • warn
    F150W_o006 visit 1: worst tile 9923.8 mas at cell (5,1) (> 15 mas)
    28/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F150W_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 103.58 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 6510.0 mas, contrast 6cell (0,1): 9156.2 mas, contrast 6cell (0,2): 8566.3 mas, contrast 5cell (0,3): 1503.0 mas, contrast 5cell (0,4): 7748.6 mas, contrast 5cell (0,5): 65.2 mas, contrast 11cell (1,0): 7289.1 mas, contrast 4cell (1,1): 4999.0 mas, contrast 6cell (1,2): 7164.6 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 7142.9 mas, contrast 4cell (1,4): 6253.2 mas, contrast 5cell (1,5): 92.4 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 110.3 mas, contrast 8cell (2,1): 1667.8 mas, contrast 5cell (2,2): 5759.6 mas, contrast 5cell (2,3): 2613.1 mas, contrast 4cell (2,4): 1447.6 mas, contrast 5cell (2,5): 9319.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,0): 108.1 mas, contrast 8cell (3,1): 4910.8 mas, contrast 6cell (3,2): 5405.7 mas, contrast 4cell (3,3): 7356.6 mas, contrast 4cell (3,4): 1869.6 mas, contrast 5cell (3,5): 9870.8 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 102.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 1958.0 mas, contrast 6cell (4,2): 2504.9 mas, contrast 4cell (4,3): 6192.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 1957.4 mas, contrast 6cell (4,5): 4319.6 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 96.7 mas, contrast 8cell (5,1): 9923.8 mas, contrast 4cell (5,2): 7880.9 mas, contrast 8cell (5,3): 8996.5 mas, contrast 9cell (5,4): 98.5 mas, contrast 6cell (5,5): 7697.1 mas, contrast 4
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,1)9,923.8-8,510.4-5,104.34.5100193
    (3,5)9,870.8-7,657.56,228.55.0146918
    (2,5)9,319.6-7,034.4-6,113.35.0138573
    (0,1)9,156.21,821.68,973.25.5160285
    (5,3)8,996.5-8,957.0842.59.084408
    (0,2)8,566.3-4,234.37,446.65.0109127
    (5,2)7,880.9-1,715.77,691.98.065653
    (0,4)7,748.6-4,107.36,570.45.098219
    (5,5)7,697.1-7,363.62,241.34.5127848
    (3,3)7,356.6-6,815.7-2,768.74.0104914
    (1,0)7,289.1-2,306.7-6,914.54.3178922
    (1,2)7,164.64,960.1-5,170.15.5115369
    (1,3)7,142.9-5,891.7-4,038.64.5116740
    (0,0)6,510.0-4,037.1-5,107.06.0150392
    (1,4)6,253.2-3,830.8-4,942.55.0124376
    (4,3)6,192.3-1,891.45,896.45.0129984
    (2,2)5,759.6-4,845.0-3,114.25.0110274
    (3,2)5,405.74,895.5-2,292.44.597835
    (1,1)4,999.0-3,373.7-3,688.95.5165064
    (3,1)4,910.8-3,633.8-3,303.36.0141523
    (4,5)4,319.6-2,435.4-3,567.65.5158746
    (2,3)2,613.1-2,410.0-1,010.04.08204
    (4,2)2,504.9-2,110.0-1,350.04.08342
    (4,1)1,958.0-212.8-1,946.46.0154801
    (4,4)1,957.4-1,892.9-498.45.5176869
    (3,4)1,869.61,848.0-283.45.010315
    (2,1)1,667.8-1,516.7693.85.0140548
    (0,3)1,503.0-386.0-1,452.65.08270
    (2,4)1,447.6-28.4-1,447.35.0110253
    (2,0)110.3-102.3-41.38.0125878
    (3,0)108.1-98.2-45.28.0125376
    (4,0)102.5-95.5-37.26.0100591
    (5,4)98.5-88.2-43.96.0149576
    (5,0)96.7-89.0-37.88.073470
    (1,5)92.4-52.5-76.15.091182
    (0,5)65.2-51.9-39.511.050069
  • warn
    F182M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 9604.5 mas at cell (0,5) (> 15 mas)
    32/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 142.13 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 2090.5 mas, contrast 5cell (0,1): 2801.9 mas, contrast 4cell (0,2): 7870.1 mas, contrast 5cell (0,3): 8655.5 mas, contrast 4cell (0,4): 7755.8 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 9604.5 mas, contrast 7cell (1,0): 2533.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,1): 3940.7 mas, contrast 4cell (1,2): 7230.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 5800.5 mas, contrast 6cell (1,4): 6274.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,5): 5931.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 109.2 mas, contrast 8cell (2,1): 7507.4 mas, contrast 6cell (2,2): 8219.6 mas, contrast 5cell (2,3): 4771.1 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 1443.8 mas, contrast 6cell (2,5): 8268.2 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 5904.5 mas, contrast 6cell (3,1): 4916.4 mas, contrast 8cell (3,2): 4224.0 mas, contrast 4cell (3,3): 1771.7 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 4641.2 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 988.4 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 7931.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,1): 1878.1 mas, contrast 5cell (4,2): 2498.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,3): 8044.1 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 1088.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,5): 1700.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 8355.8 mas, contrast 5cell (5,1): 9205.0 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 6717.8 mas, contrast 8cell (5,3): 8635.0 mas, contrast 5cell (5,4): 8280.7 mas, contrast 6cell (5,5): 7696.6 mas, contrast 5
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,5)9,604.5-9,169.4-2,857.87.076012
    (5,1)9,205.0-820.8-9,168.45.5130416
    (0,3)8,655.55,160.7-6,948.74.5110886
    (5,3)8,635.05,690.86,494.55.0101508
    (5,0)8,355.8-1,965.38,121.45.0104057
    (5,4)8,280.78,224.9959.96.0177185
    (2,5)8,268.22,438.77,900.45.5173119
    (2,2)8,219.6-180.28,217.75.0128030
    (4,3)8,044.1-6,615.3-4,576.65.0149938
    (4,0)7,931.9-6,759.94,149.45.0141126
    (0,2)7,870.1-7,702.0-1,618.15.0124358
    (0,4)7,755.8-4,117.06,572.86.5121390
    (5,5)7,696.6-7,362.82,242.35.0161715
    (2,1)7,507.4-1,692.87,314.15.5170412
    (1,2)7,230.47,025.51,708.95.5137016
    (5,2)6,717.8-5,651.0-3,632.58.082183
    (1,4)6,274.4-3,833.5-4,967.25.5160483
    (1,5)5,931.1-704.65,889.05.5126610
    (3,0)5,904.55,441.7-2,291.46.0165260
    (1,3)5,800.5-5,349.8-2,241.66.5140800
    (3,1)4,916.4-3,635.8-3,309.57.5170612
    (2,3)4,771.1-1,890.14,380.85.0114625
    (3,4)4,641.2-4,032.02,298.76.0162108
    (3,2)4,224.0-2,244.33,578.54.5112246
    (1,1)3,940.73,485.2-1,839.24.3197588
    (0,1)2,801.9-2,264.7-1,649.74.016180
    (1,0)2,533.4-2,033.51,510.86.019915
    (4,2)2,498.9-2,103.7-1,348.75.010060
    (0,0)2,090.52,089.371.45.016819
    (4,1)1,878.1-1,864.5-225.45.016989
    (3,3)1,771.71,311.41,191.36.011237
    (4,5)1,700.3-655.0-1,569.16.016650
    (2,4)1,443.8-31.0-1,443.46.0147400
    (4,4)1,088.3-991.0-449.85.019222
    (3,5)988.4766.0-624.76.0175196
    (2,0)109.2-100.2-43.47.5162531
  • warn
    F210M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 9836.9 mas at cell (0,2) (> 15 mas)
    28/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 75.22 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 2091.2 mas, contrast 5cell (0,1): 114.2 mas, contrast 5cell (0,2): 9836.9 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 8827.0 mas, contrast 5cell (0,4): 5789.8 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 9694.9 mas, contrast 9cell (1,0): 2532.1 mas, contrast 7cell (1,1): 1726.8 mas, contrast 4cell (1,2): 7081.7 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 9262.3 mas, contrast 6cell (1,4): 6318.1 mas, contrast 6cell (1,5): 4189.0 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 4985.5 mas, contrast 6cell (2,1): 1875.4 mas, contrast 4cell (2,2): 5758.9 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 5577.7 mas, contrast 6cell (2,4): 1443.3 mas, contrast 6cell (2,5): 2218.4 mas, contrast 4cell (3,0): 2928.0 mas, contrast 4cell (3,1): 7782.2 mas, contrast 5cell (3,2): 5408.2 mas, contrast 4cell (3,3): 9544.0 mas, contrast 5cell (3,4): 4649.2 mas, contrast 7cell (3,5): 1422.0 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 2636.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 1878.7 mas, contrast 5cell (4,2): 6452.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,3): 2459.9 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 1496.4 mas, contrast 6cell (4,5): 1383.4 mas, contrast 5cell (5,0): 8749.6 mas, contrast 5cell (5,1): 2554.0 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 7873.4 mas, contrast 4cell (5,3): 7749.1 mas, contrast 5cell (5,4): 1610.2 mas, contrast 5cell (5,5): 7818.2 mas, contrast 5
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,2)9,836.9-3,169.3-9,312.45.5127205
    (0,5)9,694.9-7,700.85,889.69.083201
    (3,3)9,544.01,898.59,353.25.0131825
    (1,3)9,262.3-3,219.98,684.65.5145452
    (0,3)8,827.0-8,766.41,032.55.0112911
    (5,0)8,749.68,717.2-751.45.0114280
    (5,2)7,873.4-1,721.07,683.04.588592
    (5,5)7,818.2-4,628.36,301.05.0169477
    (3,1)7,782.2-7,020.1-3,358.84.7178835
    (5,3)7,749.12,561.4-7,313.55.0103111
    (1,2)7,081.74,836.25,173.25.5141071
    (4,2)6,452.3160.4-6,450.35.0119739
    (1,4)6,318.1-1,030.1-6,233.66.5172869
    (0,4)5,789.8-3,644.64,498.76.0127013
    (2,2)5,758.9-4,844.8-3,113.36.0130208
    (2,3)5,577.7-5,111.5-2,232.25.5119253
    (3,2)5,408.24,897.1-2,295.04.5113687
    (2,0)4,985.5-4,160.22,747.46.5175824
    (3,4)4,649.2-4,030.62,317.07.0174629
    (1,5)4,189.03,502.72,297.55.5137043
    (3,0)2,928.0-2,890.0470.04.015420
    (4,0)2,636.51,892.8-1,835.35.5155637
    (5,1)2,554.0-2,501.7-514.25.5139001
    (1,0)2,532.1-2,032.51,510.37.020913
    (4,3)2,459.9-1,641.1-1,832.55.0150605
    (2,5)2,218.4-2,075.5783.34.015806
    (0,0)2,091.22,090.071.25.018013
    (4,1)1,878.7-1,865.1-225.65.017933
    (2,1)1,875.4-1,710.0770.04.015952
    (1,1)1,726.8-1,630.0-570.04.018557
    (5,4)1,610.2909.1-1,329.15.016474
    (4,4)1,496.41,491.9-115.86.019778
    (2,4)1,443.3-24.0-1,443.16.5157152
    (3,5)1,422.01,412.0-168.45.016293
    (4,5)1,383.4-230.81,364.15.017218
    (0,1)114.2-105.3-44.24.7196764
  • warn
    F277W_o006 visit 1: worst tile 28122.3 mas at cell (5,2) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 2648.02 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 8357.9 mas, contrast 5cell (0,1): 5469.9 mas, contrast 7cell (0,2): 12666.8 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 14013.3 mas, contrast 6cell (0,4): 7086.0 mas, contrast 5cell (0,5): 26172.2 mas, contrast 6cell (1,0): 8556.1 mas, contrast 7cell (1,1): 7621.9 mas, contrast 6cell (1,2): 7161.1 mas, contrast 5cell (1,3): 8561.4 mas, contrast 5cell (1,4): 6835.9 mas, contrast 6cell (1,5): 8965.4 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 6530.4 mas, contrast 6cell (2,1): 9832.4 mas, contrast 6cell (2,2): 16718.7 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 13195.9 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 6994.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,5): 6876.3 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 7816.4 mas, contrast 7cell (3,1): 6819.5 mas, contrast 6cell (3,2): 3176.3 mas, contrast 6cell (3,3): 2785.3 mas, contrast 5cell (3,4): 8554.4 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 9783.5 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 6868.8 mas, contrast 6cell (4,1): 9548.7 mas, contrast 7cell (4,2): 7455.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 26654.7 mas, contrast 6cell (4,4): 9921.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,5): 4586.9 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 8736.1 mas, contrast 6cell (5,1): 6986.7 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 28122.3 mas, contrast 5cell (5,3): 26107.6 mas, contrast 6cell (5,4): 6376.5 mas, contrast 5cell (5,5): 4043.8 mas, contrast 5
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,2)28,122.3-14,868.5-23,870.35.0137210
    (4,3)26,654.724,505.810,485.26.0173775
    (0,5)26,172.2-23,872.6-10,727.76.0152833
    (5,3)26,107.6-25,943.02,927.76.0148589
    (2,2)16,718.7-12,701.0-10,872.05.5154454
    (0,3)14,013.31,879.8-13,886.66.0172090
    (2,3)13,195.9-6,118.311,691.85.3209824
    (0,2)12,666.8-11,481.15,351.06.0164669
    (4,4)9,921.5-9,096.53,961.06.040744
    (2,1)9,832.4-9,831.8104.46.034033
    (3,5)9,783.5-9,154.73,450.85.033527
    (4,1)9,548.78,564.0-4,223.47.039092
    (1,5)8,965.4-3,364.28,310.25.025467
    (5,0)8,736.18,703.0-760.46.022981
    (1,3)8,561.4-4,975.2-6,967.45.026931
    (1,0)8,556.1-3,451.97,828.97.037741
    (3,4)8,554.4-1,828.18,356.86.038030
    (0,0)8,357.9-6,055.3-5,760.95.033230
    (3,0)7,816.4-7,786.0688.37.040000
    (1,1)7,621.91,968.17,363.46.036023
    (4,2)7,455.5-6,891.6-2,844.16.0173847
    (1,2)7,161.14,958.9-5,166.35.020926
    (0,4)7,086.0-1,648.06,891.75.021723
    (2,4)6,994.12,180.1-6,645.66.037181
    (5,1)6,986.7-3,301.0-6,157.76.027838
    (2,5)6,876.3-6,611.2-1,890.96.031419
    (4,0)6,868.8-6,578.0-1,977.66.034857
    (1,4)6,835.9-4,165.0-5,420.56.033682
    (3,1)6,819.5-5,213.9-4,395.56.036347
    (2,0)6,530.46,497.6654.36.037565
    (5,4)6,376.5-3,245.45,488.85.032227
    (0,1)5,469.94,642.12,893.37.034009
    (4,5)4,586.9-2,102.5-4,076.76.034714
    (5,5)4,043.8-4,033.1294.25.025694
    (3,2)3,176.3232.23,167.86.019335
    (3,3)2,785.3360.0-2,761.95.022538
  • warn
    F300M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 28073.4 mas at cell (5,2) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F300M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 1.91 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 95.4 mas, contrast 8cell (0,1): 7937.3 mas, contrast 6cell (0,2): 27524.1 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 8535.6 mas, contrast 5cell (0,4): 7103.7 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 26570.3 mas, contrast 6cell (1,0): 33.7 mas, contrast 8cell (1,1): 77.4 mas, contrast 7cell (1,2): 5479.5 mas, contrast 5cell (1,3): 46.5 mas, contrast 6cell (1,4): 36.5 mas, contrast 8cell (1,5): 42.5 mas, contrast 7cell (2,0): 33.8 mas, contrast 11cell (2,1): 9488.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,2): 24454.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 6426.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,4): 15.5 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 3237.1 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 34.7 mas, contrast 9cell (3,1): 37.2 mas, contrast 9cell (3,2): 5451.0 mas, contrast 6cell (3,3): 7416.1 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 7041.1 mas, contrast 7cell (3,5): 4990.4 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 18.6 mas, contrast 8cell (4,1): 21.3 mas, contrast 9cell (4,2): 6921.1 mas, contrast 5cell (4,3): 1410.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 9712.3 mas, contrast 7cell (4,5): 7794.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 21.9 mas, contrast 9cell (5,1): 6155.2 mas, contrast 7cell (5,2): 28073.4 mas, contrast 6cell (5,3): 37.9 mas, contrast 7cell (5,4): 2525.2 mas, contrast 6cell (5,5): 7640.4 mas, contrast 6
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,2)28,073.418,746.820,896.86.5146604
    (0,2)27,524.1-27,509.3903.05.5171339
    (0,5)26,570.3-19,265.9-18,297.75.5164848
    (2,2)24,454.2-10,103.622,269.36.0161325
    (4,4)9,712.3-8,151.05,281.17.046530
    (2,1)9,488.1-9,235.02,176.86.038094
    (0,3)8,535.6-6,166.8-5,901.45.019588
    (0,1)7,937.34,231.5-6,715.36.037148
    (4,5)7,794.3-7,234.8-2,899.66.039997
    (5,5)7,640.45,174.5-5,621.36.029654
    (3,3)7,416.17,308.91,256.46.025580
    (0,4)7,103.7-3,156.96,363.66.026061
    (3,4)7,041.1-2,173.66,697.27.042140
    (4,2)6,921.1-6,920.498.75.021841
    (2,3)6,426.1-1,250.06,303.36.024745
    (5,1)6,155.2-2,367.7-5,681.67.031553
    (1,2)5,479.53,043.1-4,556.85.022589
    (3,2)5,451.04,972.1-2,234.26.020490
    (3,5)4,990.4-4,977.1364.66.038016
    (2,5)3,237.1-3,162.8689.96.035550
    (5,4)2,525.2-2,328.9976.46.038105
    (4,3)1,410.3-362.01,363.15.026623
    (0,0)95.4-90.031.58.039141
    (1,1)77.418.675.17.039465
    (1,3)46.526.5-38.16.031192
    (1,5)42.532.1-27.87.029509
    (5,3)37.922.9-30.27.0167494
    (3,1)37.2-31.9-19.19.039127
    (1,4)36.535.39.38.039631
    (3,0)34.7-31.5-14.69.045226
    (2,0)33.8-33.45.311.044057
    (1,0)33.79.232.58.043123
    (5,0)21.9-20.5-7.79.027739
    (4,1)21.3-20.75.19.041387
    (4,0)18.6-7.1-17.28.041006
    (2,4)15.515.0-3.88.040294
  • warn
    F335M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 27754.3 mas at cell (0,5) (> 15 mas)
    35/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    36/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 13.93 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 43.7 mas, contrast 9cell (0,1): 34.8 mas, contrast 7cell (0,2): 22173.6 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 26790.3 mas, contrast 4cell (0,4): 5774.7 mas, contrast 5cell (0,5): 27754.3 mas, contrast 6cell (1,0): 5750.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,1): 37.6 mas, contrast 6cell (1,2): 30.1 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 34.1 mas, contrast 7cell (1,4): 39.8 mas, contrast 9cell (1,5): 8345.5 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 36.1 mas, contrast 9cell (2,1): 39.3 mas, contrast 9cell (2,2): 24406.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 7877.6 mas, contrast 5cell (2,4): 29.8 mas, contrast 10cell (2,5): 4853.3 mas, contrast 5cell (3,0): 41.3 mas, contrast 7cell (3,1): 28.4 mas, contrast 8cell (3,2): 7255.9 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 5781.3 mas, contrast 5cell (3,4): 9195.9 mas, contrast 6cell (3,5): 7850.8 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 28.2 mas, contrast 9cell (4,1): 25.1 mas, contrast 13cell (4,2): 7366.4 mas, contrast 5cell (4,3): 9123.5 mas, contrast 6cell (4,4): 9404.1 mas, contrast 6cell (4,5): 8621.2 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 39.6 mas, contrast 11cell (5,1): 18.4 mas, contrast 9cell (5,2): 15403.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,3): 25539.5 mas, contrast 6cell (5,4): 59.1 mas, contrast 7cell (5,5): 8805.9 mas, contrast 5
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,5)27,754.35,133.427,275.56.0164790
    (0,3)26,790.3-22,904.613,896.14.3182147
    (5,3)25,539.5-1,276.025,507.65.5162209
    (2,2)24,406.1-18,867.9-15,481.06.0160501
    (0,2)22,173.6-20,856.7-7,527.86.5173604
    (5,2)15,403.3-11,077.810,702.65.5149574
    (4,4)9,404.1-8,902.83,029.46.043753
    (3,4)9,195.9-6,171.5-6,817.46.040421
    (4,3)9,123.5-7,157.8-5,657.36.025765
    (5,5)8,805.9-6,438.76,007.35.029835
    (4,5)8,621.2-4,960.07,051.46.039524
    (1,5)8,345.5-6,509.35,222.76.027903
    (2,3)7,877.6-5,191.45,925.05.024007
    (3,5)7,850.8-2,094.67,566.36.036201
    (4,2)7,366.4-6,826.2-2,768.85.021089
    (3,2)7,255.9-5,542.3-4,683.15.020246
    (3,3)5,781.3-496.75,759.95.024016
    (0,4)5,774.7-5,762.0381.65.025537
    (1,0)5,750.4-5,219.6-2,413.06.042596
    (2,5)4,853.3-3,828.42,982.95.035354
    (5,4)59.1-30.7-50.57.037360
    (0,0)43.7-41.912.59.038752
    (3,0)41.3-31.3-27.07.042694
    (1,4)39.831.9-23.99.037468
    (5,0)39.6-23.6-31.811.027517
    (2,1)39.3-25.929.59.035771
    (1,1)37.6-12.135.66.038433
    (2,0)36.1-30.2-19.99.040954
    (0,1)34.8-32.512.77.037689
    (1,3)34.19.832.67.029184
    (1,2)30.1-28.5-9.86.023222
    (2,4)29.8-23.9-17.910.038742
    (3,1)28.4-22.8-16.88.037259
    (4,0)28.2-19.3-20.59.038071
    (4,1)25.1-18.2-17.313.040161
    (5,1)18.4-14.511.49.030486
  • warn
    F360M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 21791.8 mas at cell (3,2) (> 15 mas)
    35/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    35/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 11.46 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 9294.6 mas, contrast 6cell (0,1): 14.4 mas, contrast 8cell (0,2): 24.4 mas, contrast 6cell (0,3): 20339.7 mas, contrast 5cell (0,4): 6088.9 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 18830.7 mas, contrast 6cell (1,0): 6451.8 mas, contrast 6cell (1,1): 141.7 mas, contrast 7cell (1,2): 34.8 mas, contrast 7cell (1,3): 31.5 mas, contrast 9cell (1,4): 46.3 mas, contrast 9cell (1,5): 9482.4 mas, contrast 5cell (2,0): 26.3 mas, contrast 8cell (2,1): 7533.9 mas, contrast 6cell (2,2): 39.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 7697.0 mas, contrast 6cell (2,4): 23.4 mas, contrast 8cell (2,5): 7661.8 mas, contrast 5cell (3,0): 9229.6 mas, contrast 6cell (3,1): 28.1 mas, contrast 8cell (3,2): 21791.8 mas, contrast 6cell (3,3): 7401.3 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 36.0 mas, contrast 9cell (3,5): 9645.1 mas, contrast 6cell (4,0): 25.8 mas, contrast 8cell (4,1): 29.5 mas, contrast 12cell (4,2): 31.9 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 4879.3 mas, contrast 5cell (4,4): 9400.6 mas, contrast 7cell (4,5): 9818.0 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 45.0 mas, contrast 8cell (5,1): 9577.2 mas, contrast 6cell (5,2): 21144.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,3): 20982.3 mas, contrast 6cell (5,4): 6587.1 mas, contrast 7cell (5,5): 7728.5 mas, contrast 5
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (3,2)21,791.8-21,471.73,721.46.0176491
    (5,2)21,144.3-20,262.36,042.95.5149851
    (5,3)20,982.3-14,155.715,487.85.5157956
    (0,3)20,339.714,482.514,281.54.7186985
    (0,5)18,830.7-10,090.015,899.36.0162694
    (4,5)9,818.0-5,650.4-8,029.06.039784
    (3,5)9,645.1-2,783.5-9,234.76.036761
    (5,1)9,577.2-8,021.05,233.16.030470
    (1,5)9,482.4-1,841.59,301.85.027193
    (4,4)9,400.6-8,900.13,026.67.042901
    (0,0)9,294.6-4,167.0-8,308.26.038719
    (3,0)9,229.6-7,308.5-5,636.76.042133
    (5,5)7,728.5-6,706.13,841.75.030841
    (2,3)7,697.0-2,817.77,162.86.024589
    (2,5)7,661.8-7,173.8-2,690.85.034547
    (2,1)7,533.91,509.07,381.26.036030
    (3,3)7,401.37,296.91,238.66.023760
    (5,4)6,587.15,840.5-3,046.27.037911
    (1,0)6,451.8-6,412.1714.36.041776
    (0,4)6,088.9-5,036.63,421.66.024979
    (4,3)4,879.3-3,773.03,093.85.025704
    (1,1)141.7107.6-92.37.037684
    (1,4)46.338.1-26.49.037447
    (5,0)45.0-23.1-38.68.028095
    (2,2)39.212.7-37.16.019475
    (3,4)36.0-28.9-21.49.040787
    (1,2)34.8-29.2-19.07.022863
    (4,2)31.9-20.5-24.46.021895
    (1,3)31.57.630.59.029240
    (4,1)29.5-25.6-14.712.041967
    (3,1)28.1-21.0-18.68.037276
    (2,0)26.3-24.49.98.041049
    (4,0)25.8-18.8-17.78.038120
    (0,2)24.4-21.112.36.019185
    (2,4)23.4-15.3-17.78.038629
  • warn
    F410M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 28291.1 mas at cell (0,5) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F410M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    35/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 1.38 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 24.8 mas, contrast 15cell (0,1): 22.3 mas, contrast 10cell (0,2): 30.6 mas, contrast 7cell (0,3): 3907.8 mas, contrast 5cell (0,4): 6083.8 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 28291.1 mas, contrast 6cell (1,0): 25.9 mas, contrast 8cell (1,1): 7469.9 mas, contrast 7cell (1,2): 29.1 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 46.0 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 44.5 mas, contrast 8cell (1,5): 34.4 mas, contrast 7cell (2,0): 34.4 mas, contrast 12cell (2,1): 41.0 mas, contrast 8cell (2,2): 42.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 6754.7 mas, contrast 6cell (2,4): 19.3 mas, contrast 11cell (2,5): 3240.3 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 33.7 mas, contrast 9cell (3,1): 29.1 mas, contrast 9cell (3,2): 7182.5 mas, contrast 5cell (3,3): 8806.6 mas, contrast 6cell (3,4): 24.4 mas, contrast 8cell (3,5): 25.4 mas, contrast 9cell (4,0): 26.8 mas, contrast 8cell (4,1): 7.0 mas, contrast 13cell (4,2): 28.6 mas, contrast 8cell (4,3): 22.9 mas, contrast 8cell (4,4): 46.7 mas, contrast 9cell (4,5): 25.2 mas, contrast 7cell (5,0): 36.9 mas, contrast 10cell (5,1): 18.3 mas, contrast 8cell (5,2): 16.5 mas, contrast 6cell (5,3): 40.2 mas, contrast 8cell (5,4): 29.4 mas, contrast 9cell (5,5): 31.2 mas, contrast 7
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (0,5)28,291.1-27,830.25,085.66.0176553
    (3,3)8,806.64,025.87,832.66.025209
    (1,1)7,469.9-6,453.8-3,761.37.040909
    (3,2)7,182.5-2,165.1-6,848.45.020730
    (2,3)6,754.7-2,604.96,232.26.025122
    (0,4)6,083.8-5,027.33,426.26.027344
    (0,3)3,907.8-2,557.6-2,954.55.018795
    (2,5)3,240.3-3,167.3683.96.036969
    (4,4)46.713.744.69.044638
    (1,3)46.019.4-41.78.029936
    (1,4)44.544.35.08.038753
    (2,2)42.218.4-37.96.5171510
    (2,1)41.0-21.335.08.037471
    (5,3)40.214.6-37.47.5173285
    (5,0)36.9-17.9-32.310.028616
    (2,0)34.4-28.120.012.042518
    (1,5)34.430.815.27.028353
    (3,0)33.7-32.010.69.043298
    (5,5)31.228.113.57.032724
    (0,2)30.6-24.818.07.020184
    (5,4)29.4-17.8-23.39.039727
    (1,2)29.1-22.618.36.024246
    (3,1)29.1-25.9-13.19.038852
    (4,2)28.6-6.527.98.023067
    (4,0)26.813.323.28.038289
    (1,0)25.95.925.28.044800
    (3,5)25.423.89.09.038762
    (4,5)25.26.8-24.27.040567
    (0,0)24.8-15.419.415.042301
    (3,4)24.4-16.6-17.98.041013
    (4,3)22.98.021.58.026912
    (0,1)22.3-16.515.110.042263
    (2,4)19.313.6-13.711.039290
    (5,1)18.3-10.914.78.031054
    (5,2)16.513.79.26.016200
  • warn
    F430M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 33.3 mas at cell (5,5) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F430M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    30/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.37 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 24.2 mas, contrast 29cell (0,1): 20.2 mas, contrast 24cell (0,2): 15.2 mas, contrast 15cell (0,3): 19.2 mas, contrast 9cell (0,4): 21.4 mas, contrast 11cell (0,5): 20.5 mas, contrast 8cell (1,0): 24.1 mas, contrast 22cell (1,1): 14.8 mas, contrast 15cell (1,2): 18.9 mas, contrast 10cell (1,3): 28.5 mas, contrast 14cell (1,4): 22.4 mas, contrast 20cell (1,5): 28.1 mas, contrast 12cell (2,0): 23.7 mas, contrast 22cell (2,1): 18.3 mas, contrast 15cell (2,2): 17.5 mas, contrast 13cell (2,3): 15.4 mas, contrast 9cell (2,4): 16.4 mas, contrast 16cell (2,5): 12.1 mas, contrast 11cell (3,0): 12.1 mas, contrast 23cell (3,1): 26.9 mas, contrast 21cell (3,2): 23.4 mas, contrast 12cell (3,3): 19.6 mas, contrast 10cell (3,4): 16.8 mas, contrast 16cell (3,5): 22.3 mas, contrast 18cell (4,0): 14.7 mas, contrast 15cell (4,1): 7.3 mas, contrast 21cell (4,2): 24.5 mas, contrast 13cell (4,3): 15.3 mas, contrast 12cell (4,4): 24.5 mas, contrast 16cell (4,5): 24.3 mas, contrast 17cell (5,0): 18.9 mas, contrast 16cell (5,1): 10.7 mas, contrast 13cell (5,2): 17.7 mas, contrast 8cell (5,3): 20.7 mas, contrast 10cell (5,4): 24.6 mas, contrast 14cell (5,5): 33.3 mas, contrast 13
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,5)33.324.522.613.032151
    (1,3)28.515.2-24.114.030615
    (1,5)28.126.6-8.912.029758
    (3,1)26.9-24.012.321.039199
    (5,4)24.6-17.5-17.214.039974
    (4,4)24.518.416.216.046167
    (4,2)24.5-12.720.913.023538
    (4,5)24.316.5-17.917.041334
    (0,0)24.2-17.017.329.044087
    (1,0)24.1-12.420.622.045219
    (2,0)23.7-22.4-7.822.043832
    (3,2)23.4-4.7-22.912.021878
    (1,4)22.421.94.620.039596
    (3,5)22.317.713.518.040742
    (0,4)21.413.017.011.027858
    (5,3)20.79.8-18.310.018524
    (0,5)20.515.4-13.68.017685
    (0,1)20.2-13.914.624.041999
    (3,3)19.617.88.010.026343
    (0,3)19.2-15.710.99.020346
    (1,2)18.9-14.911.610.025852
    (5,0)18.9-15.8-10.416.028441
    (2,1)18.3-13.812.115.038400
    (5,2)17.715.09.38.016469
    (2,2)17.516.26.613.021567
    (3,4)16.811.6-12.216.041553
    (2,4)16.414.57.516.038774
    (2,3)15.48.412.99.025787
    (4,3)15.311.510.112.027433
    (0,2)15.24.614.515.021333
  • warn
    F480M_o006 visit 1: worst tile 29.9 mas at cell (1,5) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_o006_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    26/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.41 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 23.0 mas, contrast 30cell (0,1): 14.5 mas, contrast 31cell (0,2): 16.6 mas, contrast 18cell (0,3): 17.2 mas, contrast 11cell (0,4): 22.4 mas, contrast 13cell (0,5): 18.5 mas, contrast 11cell (1,0): 19.9 mas, contrast 24cell (1,1): 15.2 mas, contrast 21cell (1,2): 8.5 mas, contrast 15cell (1,3): 19.6 mas, contrast 17cell (1,4): 24.5 mas, contrast 21cell (1,5): 29.9 mas, contrast 15cell (2,0): 23.7 mas, contrast 27cell (2,1): 17.7 mas, contrast 19cell (2,2): 14.3 mas, contrast 17cell (2,3): 14.8 mas, contrast 14cell (2,4): 13.1 mas, contrast 18cell (2,5): 18.9 mas, contrast 14cell (3,0): 22.6 mas, contrast 27cell (3,1): 23.8 mas, contrast 27cell (3,2): 12.3 mas, contrast 13cell (3,3): 26.3 mas, contrast 12cell (3,4): 16.8 mas, contrast 21cell (3,5): 21.7 mas, contrast 19cell (4,0): 15.6 mas, contrast 23cell (4,1): 8.4 mas, contrast 27cell (4,2): 9.5 mas, contrast 15cell (4,3): 17.4 mas, contrast 13cell (4,4): 19.6 mas, contrast 18cell (4,5): 17.7 mas, contrast 18cell (5,0): 16.1 mas, contrast 18cell (5,1): 3.4 mas, contrast 18cell (5,2): 11.6 mas, contrast 12cell (5,3): 16.1 mas, contrast 12cell (5,4): 19.0 mas, contrast 12cell (5,5): 26.3 mas, contrast 15
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (1,5)29.928.1-10.115.028736
    (5,5)26.320.216.915.033286
    (3,3)26.324.3-10.012.025693
    (1,4)24.522.0-10.721.041186
    (3,1)23.8-22.38.227.039603
    (2,0)23.7-22.0-8.727.041587
    (0,0)23.0-15.716.930.042898
    (3,0)22.6-22.0-5.227.041919
    (0,4)22.413.917.613.028397
    (3,5)21.717.412.819.040934
    (1,0)19.9-12.115.924.044100
    (4,4)19.617.58.818.045993
    (1,3)19.613.4-14.317.030865
    (5,4)19.0-17.3-7.812.038844
    (2,5)18.918.1-5.214.037767
    (0,5)18.515.99.511.018395
    (4,5)17.717.24.018.042196
    (2,1)17.7-12.412.619.037834
    (4,3)17.412.811.813.027305
    (0,3)17.2-15.18.411.020232
    (3,4)16.812.9-10.721.041572
    (0,2)16.67.614.718.022260
    (5,3)16.19.0-13.412.018616
    (5,0)16.1-9.3-13.218.027407
    (4,0)15.6-13.5-8.023.036913
    (1,1)15.23.714.821.042383
  • ok
    F090W_o006: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F090W_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F115W_o006: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F115W_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F140M_o006: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F140M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F150W_o006: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F150W_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F182M_o006: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F182M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F210M_o006: all 32 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F277W_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F277W_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F300M_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F300M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F335M_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F335M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F360M_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F410M_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F410M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F430M_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F430M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    F480M_o006: all 8 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_o006_latest.json
  • ok
    m7 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    8 recent log(s), no error signatures
    logs/
  • ok
    m7: single tag 2026-09-14_PR883_321241f-dirty (24 products)
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • ok
    m8: single tag 2026-09-14_PR883_321241f-dirty (3 products)
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
Generated 2026-09-19 08:34 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.