jwst-gc pipeline monitor

cloudef_controlfield · 2026-09-19 08:34 EDT
1 runs 1 failing 0 flagged 0 clear 0 queued

Overview

One card per registered observation. The bar is the stage ladder in run order — reduction (unc·cal·red·i2d) then cataloging (m12→m8). Solid = every filter has it, pale = some do, STRIPED = it exists but predates an earlier stage, so it was built from inputs that have since been regenerated, hatched = the product name cannot be attributed to this observation. Click a card for the detail.

cloudef_controlfield 2092/o005 17d ago
5 fail7 warn
F162MF210MF360MF480M

Detail

cloudef_controlfield · 2092/o005

/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/cloudef_controlfield back to overview

Stage ladder

unccalredi2dm12m3m4m5m6m7m8

Products per filter

filterunccalcrfredi2dsatm12m3m4m5m6reduced as
F162M6464·6460133333destreak
F210M6464·6460133333destreak
F360M1616·1660133333destreak
F480M1616·1660133333destreak

* = the product name carries no _o<obs> token and this field has more than one observation, so the count cannot be attributed to 2092/o005.

Astrometry — m2 checkpoint

filtervisitexposuresmisaligned sweptmin contrastbulk tie (mas)tie from tiles okworst tile (mas)cell checkpoint
F162M_o005 1 64 0 0 205 0.29 same-star 36/36 1626.9 (3,0) 2026-08-29T00:30:09Z
F210M_o005 1 64 7 0 216 0.48 same-star 32/36 9488.0 (5,0) 2026-08-29T01:59:51Z
F360M_o005 1 16 9 0 2298 0.53 same-star 36/36 13162.2 (5,0) 2026-08-29T03:16:15Z
F480M_o005 1 16 0 0 857 0.48 same-star 36/36 19.3 (5,1) 2026-08-29T03:49:42Z

“tiles ok” is not a tolerance. measure_offset_grid runs with no max_off_mas, and astrometry_offsets sets off_ok=True whenever that is None — so N/N counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent peak, however large the offset. The column that carries the gate is worst tile, against 15 mas.

Provenance

phaseproductspipeline tag(s)
m7152026-08-31_PR606_b3ca05f-dirty (15)
m832026-08-31_PR606_b3ca05f-dirty (3)

Queue

No jobs in the queue for this field.

Findings

  • fail
    F210M_o005: 7/64 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 3/8 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrca1 visit 1: dRA 1.0, dDec -1.8 masnrca1 visit 1: dRA 1.0, dDec -1.8 masnrcb1 visit 1: dRA -0.3, dDec 2.0 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 0.8, dDec -2.0 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 0.7, dDec -2.1 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 0.6, dDec -2.4 masnrcb4 visit 1: dRA 0.6, dDec -2.3 masnrca1 nrca2 nrca3 nrca4 nrcb1 nrcb2 nrcb3 nrcb4±2 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrcb44/8
    nrca12/8
    nrcb11/8
    nrca20/8
    nrca30/8
    nrca40/8
    nrcb20/8
    nrcb30/8
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrca11.0-1.82.0457.014910543.0
    1nrca11.0-1.82.1461.414976553.0
    1nrcb1-0.32.02.0333.617503813.0
    1nrcb40.8-2.02.2424.116953493.0
    1nrcb40.7-2.12.2435.916661433.0
    1nrcb40.6-2.42.4403.216681363.0
    1nrcb40.6-2.32.4400.216574043.0
  • fail
    F360M_o005: 9/16 exposures misaligned vs their visit consensus
    An exposure is misaligned when its offset exceeds 2.0 mas AND is significant against the peak error bars. At m2 this CORRECTS the offsets table and stops the run; the crf frames must be regenerated before cataloging continues.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o005_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    Affected: 2/2 detectors — spread across detectors, so the frame as a whole moved: look at the offsets table and whether these exposures were regenerated from _cal after the table changed. fix_alignment SKIPS a frame that already has a RAOFFSET header, so correcting the table alone leaves stale frames in place; regenerate the working copy from _cal instead of re-applying on top.
    nrcalong visit 1: dRA -0.5, dDec -3.0 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -0.6, dDec -3.1 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -0.6, dDec -3.1 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -0.7, dDec -3.0 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -2.1, dDec -0.0 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -2.1, dDec 0.0 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -2.2, dDec 0.0 masnrcalong visit 1: dRA -2.2, dDec 0.0 masnrcblong visit 1: dRA 3.0, dDec 1.8 masnrcalong nrcblong±3 mas
    Per-exposure offset vectors, coloured by detector. Solid = flagged misaligned. One colour pointing away means one detector; everything fanning out means the frame moved.
    Misaligned by detector
    nrcalong8/8
    nrcblong1/8
    visitdetectordRA (mas)dDec (mas)off (mas)contrastpairswindow ("")
    1nrcalong-0.5-3.03.04,535.0912393.0
    1nrcalong-0.6-3.13.14,729.0905833.0
    1nrcalong-0.6-3.13.24,634.0885083.0
    1nrcalong-0.7-3.03.14,552.0880643.0
    1nrcalong-2.1-0.02.12,951.0878223.0
    1nrcalong-2.10.02.12,942.0867993.0
    1nrcalong-2.20.02.22,857.0882983.0
    1nrcalong-2.20.02.22,871.0893403.0
    1nrcblong3.01.83.55,551.0868963.0
  • fail
    F210M_o005 visit 1: weakest tile peak contrast 4.33 < 5
    At least one tile has no real tie, so its offset is noise.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json
  • fail
    errors in cloudef_controlfield2092-o005-m7-finalize: missing-input, traceback
    Traceback (most recent call last): FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/orange/adamginsburg/jwst/cloudef_controlfield//reduction/fwhm_table.ecsv'
    catalog_cloudef_controlfield2092-o005-m7-finalize_40501058_4294967294.out
  • fail
    errors in cloudef_controlfield2092-o005-m7-finalize-merged: traceback
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    catalog_cloudef_controlfield2092-o005-m7-finalize-merged_40771904_4294967294.out
  • warn
    m7: 15 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • warn
    m8: 3 product(s) stamped with a -dirty tag
    The tree had uncommitted changes, so the tag does not identify the code that ran. Fine for a development run; not for a release.
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
  • warn
    F210M_o005 visit 1: reference tie recorded as could-not-verify (apply_ok=false)
    A correction is applied only when the tie is coherent AND the gross cross-check (100 mas) passes AND the per-tile map is clean. This one was not, so no correction was made — the frame keeps whatever it had.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json
  • warn
    F162M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 1626.9 mas at cell (3,0) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_o005_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    22/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.29 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 29.8 mas, contrast 8cell (0,1): 14.8 mas, contrast 11cell (0,2): 30.4 mas, contrast 16cell (0,3): 24.0 mas, contrast 12cell (0,4): 15.0 mas, contrast 11cell (0,5): 14.7 mas, contrast 13cell (1,0): 35.0 mas, contrast 7cell (1,1): 11.2 mas, contrast 12cell (1,2): 11.7 mas, contrast 20cell (1,3): 27.3 mas, contrast 8cell (1,4): 34.5 mas, contrast 12cell (1,5): 13.2 mas, contrast 17cell (2,0): 15.3 mas, contrast 7cell (2,1): 9.8 mas, contrast 12cell (2,2): 15.6 mas, contrast 12cell (2,3): 13.2 mas, contrast 8cell (2,4): 12.2 mas, contrast 11cell (2,5): 12.6 mas, contrast 16cell (3,0): 1626.9 mas, contrast 6cell (3,1): 10.1 mas, contrast 12cell (3,2): 7.5 mas, contrast 10cell (3,3): 29.5 mas, contrast 9cell (3,4): 12.0 mas, contrast 19cell (3,5): 17.7 mas, contrast 15cell (4,0): 40.6 mas, contrast 9cell (4,1): 14.1 mas, contrast 11cell (4,2): 23.5 mas, contrast 9cell (4,3): 22.1 mas, contrast 12cell (4,4): 12.2 mas, contrast 17cell (4,5): 17.8 mas, contrast 12cell (5,0): 35.5 mas, contrast 7cell (5,1): 18.1 mas, contrast 12cell (5,2): 19.1 mas, contrast 15cell (5,3): 25.9 mas, contrast 15cell (5,4): 16.7 mas, contrast 13cell (5,5): 18.5 mas, contrast 13
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (3,0)1,626.9-567.2-1,524.86.038566
    (4,0)40.6-32.3-24.69.037417
    (5,0)35.5-26.0-24.17.093697
    (1,0)35.017.930.17.033089
    (1,4)34.5-32.2-12.312.031088
    (0,2)30.4-13.627.215.7191314
    (0,0)29.8-22.4-19.78.2315019
    (3,3)29.55.9-28.99.032298
    (1,3)27.318.8-19.88.4382855
    (5,3)25.913.3-22.215.0199521
    (0,3)24.0-17.5-16.412.5170873
    (4,2)23.515.417.79.2362837
    (4,3)22.115.1-16.111.5323916
    (5,2)19.113.513.515.0159053
    (5,5)18.516.68.012.7231792
    (5,1)18.1-16.6-7.311.5157685
    (4,5)17.810.014.712.2269264
    (3,5)17.711.613.314.7248723
    (5,4)16.7-6.5-15.313.024106
    (2,2)15.6-12.29.712.031724
    (2,0)15.3-11.79.97.035988
    (0,4)15.08.0-12.711.0127607
  • warn
    F210M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 9488.0 mas at cell (5,0) (> 15 mas)
    32/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F210M_o005_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    31/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.48 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 2177.8 mas, contrast 5cell (0,1): 12.7 mas, contrast 9cell (0,2): 1684.1 mas, contrast 5cell (0,3): 2411.4 mas, contrast 5cell (0,4): 22.7 mas, contrast 6cell (0,5): 27.2 mas, contrast 4cell (1,0): 2651.4 mas, contrast 6cell (1,1): 1607.7 mas, contrast 6cell (1,2): 2896.6 mas, contrast 6cell (1,3): 12.2 mas, contrast 7cell (1,4): 2213.8 mas, contrast 6cell (1,5): 13.2 mas, contrast 6cell (2,0): 831.1 mas, contrast 7cell (2,1): 2148.7 mas, contrast 6cell (2,2): 1984.1 mas, contrast 6cell (2,3): 2509.9 mas, contrast 6cell (2,4): 1957.6 mas, contrast 6cell (2,5): 5.1 mas, contrast 6cell (3,0): 2864.3 mas, contrast 7cell (3,1): 2752.9 mas, contrast 6cell (3,2): 36.2 mas, contrast 7cell (3,3): 28.0 mas, contrast 7cell (3,4): 28.9 mas, contrast 10cell (3,5): 2525.5 mas, contrast 5cell (4,0): 575.6 mas, contrast 7cell (4,1): 1909.1 mas, contrast 6cell (4,2): 2265.0 mas, contrast 6cell (4,3): 16.8 mas, contrast 7cell (4,4): 15.9 mas, contrast 8cell (4,5): 10.6 mas, contrast 6cell (5,0): 9488.0 mas, contrast 4cell (5,1): 6035.7 mas, contrast 4cell (5,2): 9113.9 mas, contrast 5cell (5,3): 56.1 mas, contrast 5cell (5,4): 1651.2 mas, contrast 6cell (5,5): 51.9 mas, contrast 6
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,0)9,488.0-9,169.82,436.74.5117676
    (5,2)9,113.94,033.98,172.64.7217966
    (5,1)6,035.7-5,770.3-1,770.24.3201181
    (1,2)2,896.6-2,894.0-124.66.043275
    (3,0)2,864.3-1,610.92,368.47.047722
    (3,1)2,752.9-2,746.5-188.36.046686
    (1,0)2,651.4-2,630.4332.96.039634
    (3,5)2,525.5-2,506.0-313.65.030935
    (2,3)2,509.9127.8-2,506.76.044232
    (0,3)2,411.427.1-2,411.35.020781
    (4,2)2,265.0-271.4-2,248.76.040995
    (1,4)2,213.8-2,133.5-591.06.041401
    (0,0)2,177.8-2,165.2233.25.035020
    (2,1)2,148.7690.82,034.66.048713
    (2,2)1,984.1-903.61,766.46.042024
    (2,4)1,957.6-1,741.7-893.96.044358
    (4,1)1,909.1-1,889.4-273.56.046049
    (0,2)1,684.1-1,151.61,228.85.025160
    (5,4)1,651.2-1,651.029.06.032998
    (1,1)1,607.7-1,050.6-1,217.06.047186
    (2,0)831.1-590.8-584.67.044668
    (4,0)575.657.6-572.77.045727
    (5,3)56.148.8-27.75.025636
    (5,5)51.9-46.0-24.16.031553
    (3,2)36.2-5.9-35.77.041843
    (3,4)28.927.78.310.040223
    (3,3)28.09.7-26.27.041110
    (0,5)27.223.513.54.593220
    (0,4)22.7-11.419.76.0175648
    (4,3)16.813.2-10.47.040212
    (4,4)15.9-7.7-13.98.040931
  • warn
    F360M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 13162.2 mas at cell (5,0) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F360M_o005_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    26/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.53 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 15.6 mas, contrast 13cell (0,1): 14.1 mas, contrast 19cell (0,2): 32.5 mas, contrast 17cell (0,3): 12.0 mas, contrast 12cell (0,4): 22.4 mas, contrast 10cell (0,5): 7.0 mas, contrast 8cell (1,0): 43.1 mas, contrast 14cell (1,1): 19.1 mas, contrast 16cell (1,2): 25.6 mas, contrast 25cell (1,3): 12.5 mas, contrast 22cell (1,4): 19.9 mas, contrast 25cell (1,5): 20.1 mas, contrast 25cell (2,0): 29.1 mas, contrast 14cell (2,1): 28.2 mas, contrast 17cell (2,2): 23.9 mas, contrast 26cell (2,3): 19.8 mas, contrast 20cell (2,4): 22.4 mas, contrast 25cell (2,5): 20.5 mas, contrast 24cell (3,0): 23.9 mas, contrast 18cell (3,1): 30.2 mas, contrast 19cell (3,2): 13.3 mas, contrast 18cell (3,3): 14.7 mas, contrast 22cell (3,4): 11.4 mas, contrast 26cell (3,5): 8.5 mas, contrast 19cell (4,0): 22.0 mas, contrast 14cell (4,1): 26.7 mas, contrast 19cell (4,2): 33.6 mas, contrast 24cell (4,3): 11.5 mas, contrast 21cell (4,4): 16.6 mas, contrast 23cell (4,5): 17.8 mas, contrast 24cell (5,0): 13162.2 mas, contrast 8cell (5,1): 6805.5 mas, contrast 7cell (5,2): 34.4 mas, contrast 12cell (5,3): 22.6 mas, contrast 19cell (5,4): 11.8 mas, contrast 24cell (5,5): 22.7 mas, contrast 20
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,0)13,162.2-7,691.1-10,681.38.080502
    (5,1)6,805.5-839.66,753.57.021507
    (1,0)43.1-29.831.114.035956
    (5,2)34.4-7.7-33.612.024495
    (4,2)33.623.3-24.224.050397
    (0,2)32.5-28.914.817.033418
    (3,1)30.2-24.917.019.057472
    (2,0)29.1-24.915.114.046403
    (2,1)28.2-20.4-19.517.061447
    (4,1)26.7-20.0-17.719.055392
    (1,2)25.6-12.922.225.051855
    (3,0)23.9-16.817.018.053849
    (2,2)23.9-19.014.526.052123
    (5,5)22.7-20.6-9.420.038904
    (5,3)22.619.9-10.819.027007
    (2,4)22.419.4-11.125.061261
    (0,4)22.4-13.917.610.024426
    (4,0)22.016.7-14.214.046985
    (2,5)20.515.014.124.048334
    (1,5)20.114.613.825.043717
    (1,4)19.9-15.3-12.825.053579
    (2,3)19.8-14.9-13.120.049683
    (1,1)19.118.25.616.052290
    (4,5)17.813.811.224.043625
    (4,4)16.6-10.9-12.523.052275
    (0,0)15.6-15.1-4.113.034698
  • warn
    F480M_o005 visit 1: worst tile 19.3 mas at cell (5,1) (> 15 mas)
    36/36 tiles are reported "ok", but that counts tiles whose offset histogram had a coherent PEAK — not tiles within tolerance. The m7 cross-band gate is no significant 2" cell above 15 mas, and this cell exceeds it, so the bulk tie being ~0 does not mean the field is flat.
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_o005_latest.json
    what is affected, and why
    11/36 cells exceed 15 mas. They are not confined to the edge, so this is an interior residual: a distortion or per-detector alignment problem, not a coverage artefact. The bulk tie for this visit is 0.48 mas — a small bulk value cannot cancel a local one.
    cell (0,0): 16.1 mas, contrast 54cell (0,1): 13.6 mas, contrast 59cell (0,2): 16.2 mas, contrast 45cell (0,3): 9.8 mas, contrast 33cell (0,4): 14.9 mas, contrast 25cell (0,5): 7.7 mas, contrast 20cell (1,0): 15.8 mas, contrast 53cell (1,1): 6.8 mas, contrast 49cell (1,2): 7.6 mas, contrast 67cell (1,3): 5.8 mas, contrast 62cell (1,4): 9.5 mas, contrast 61cell (1,5): 16.1 mas, contrast 65cell (2,0): 16.3 mas, contrast 69cell (2,1): 15.3 mas, contrast 57cell (2,2): 11.4 mas, contrast 57cell (2,3): 8.5 mas, contrast 51cell (2,4): 14.2 mas, contrast 78cell (2,5): 13.8 mas, contrast 67cell (3,0): 14.0 mas, contrast 65cell (3,1): 13.0 mas, contrast 68cell (3,2): 6.6 mas, contrast 59cell (3,3): 6.5 mas, contrast 55cell (3,4): 14.0 mas, contrast 87cell (3,5): 13.7 mas, contrast 58cell (4,0): 16.4 mas, contrast 57cell (4,1): 16.8 mas, contrast 65cell (4,2): 6.8 mas, contrast 52cell (4,3): 8.7 mas, contrast 58cell (4,4): 16.3 mas, contrast 70cell (4,5): 12.3 mas, contrast 68cell (5,0): 15.7 mas, contrast 15cell (5,1): 19.3 mas, contrast 32cell (5,2): 11.5 mas, contrast 30cell (5,3): 10.5 mas, contrast 54cell (5,4): 13.7 mas, contrast 55cell (5,5): 13.1 mas, contrast 64
    Per-tile residual across the mosaic. Outlined cells exceed tolerance; the circled cell is the worst. Whether the bad cells sit on the edge or in the interior is the diagnosis.
    celloff (mas)dRAdDeccontrastpairs
    (5,1)19.3-17.18.932.032550
    (4,1)16.8-15.27.065.082049
    (4,0)16.4-15.3-5.857.069167
    (2,0)16.3-12.410.569.076242
    (4,4)16.312.6-10.370.073434
    (0,2)16.2-9.912.845.045489
    (1,5)16.114.17.965.062284
    (0,0)16.1-12.89.754.055707
    (1,0)15.8-13.48.453.060287
    (5,0)15.7-11.0-11.215.015507
    (2,1)15.3-13.5-7.357.084794
  • ok
    F162M_o005: all 64 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F162M_o005_latest.json
  • ok
    F480M_o005: all 16 exposures within 2.0 mas of consensus
    checkpoint_m2_F480M_o005_latest.json
  • ok
    m7 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m8 present (3 file(s))
    catalogs/
  • ok
    m7: single tag 2026-08-31_PR606_b3ca05f-dirty (15 products)
    catalogs/*m7*.prov.json
  • ok
    m8: single tag 2026-08-31_PR606_b3ca05f-dirty (3 products)
    catalogs/*m8*.prov.json
Generated 2026-09-19 08:34 EDT. Every number here is read from what the pipeline recorded — the tolerances are the ones the pipeline itself enforces, and no offset is re-measured for this page.